CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 02:23:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106487 Posts in 12420 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 63
781  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decode Help on: July 20, 2007, 06:02:43 AM
Looks fine.
782  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 RS/SS 396/L78 Camaro on: July 16, 2007, 08:34:28 PM
Theres at least a couple of thousand of them out there.  I've got an 04L pacecar but its a 350/TH350 car. No one has figured out the significance (if any) of the L date code.  The tags should have been 04D.  Old speculation is that the D stamp was broken so they used L, but why wouldn't they have used E instead?
783  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Not Camaro but maybe the ultimate Barn find. on: July 13, 2007, 07:05:27 PM
From Todd Cotter Contributing Editor to Road and Track magazine.

Manuel Menezes Morais shot the photos, but he was sworn to secrecy about the cars' location and the owner's name. However, he was able to obtain permission from the elusive owner to give me the following information:

The owner of the cars was a car dealer in the 1970s and 1980s, and decided to save the more interesting cars that came through his doors. When the barn was full, he padlocked and "soldered" the doors shut. (Perhaps welding was too permanent.)

Web sites varied on the number of cars: 58, 100, and 180 were speculated. According to Morais, there are 180 cars in the barn.

And, aw shucks, none of the cars is for sale.

Clara was able to determine that the cars are located somewhere in the area of Sintra, near Lisbon.

I asked Morais if he could ask the owner if he had a favorite car. "He has lots of good cars in very good condition," he says, "but he loves the Lancia Aurelia B24. He has two."

784  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: bad for our hobby? on: July 03, 2007, 11:07:44 AM
That bill was pushed thru by a member of this site (and, and as well).  Now we need to get similar bills submitted in each of the other 49 states.
785  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Production Dating a vehicle by VIN on: June 27, 2007, 05:57:06 AM
637106 is the last VIN in April as reported by GM.  That would have been the last car out the door at the end of the second shift, on April 30th, 1969.  They made roughly 13,200 Camaros during the month of May, this is arrived at by subtracting the end of April numbers from the end of May numbers.  A car with a VIN of 638606 would have already been in production as of April 30th since it took about 2 days to go from a firewall with a trim tag, to a completed rear body half.  Probably started its assembly on the Fisher side of the plant on the April 29th, and came over to GMs side of the plant on May 1st and rolled out the back door of GM on Monday May 5th, maybe very late in the day on May 2nd.
786  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Paint for Hockey Stick Stripe and Rear of S.S. on: June 13, 2007, 05:13:49 AM
So can we finally make a definative call and say that the rockers and tail panel paint was semi gloss black?
787  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Paint for Hockey Stick Stripe and Rear of S.S. on: June 12, 2007, 11:18:29 AM
semi gloss is about 70-80% gloss. satin might be 30% gloss, and of course flat black is 0% gloss.

Tail panel is much higher gloss than 30%, infact i beleive it is just tuxedo black which would be gloss.  Fisher painted the tail panel and rocker panel paint on their side of the plant.  How many shades of black would they have had in their in line paint booth?  The inline repair booth (at Norwood) was where all the big block tail panels, rockers and striping work was done.  Do you think they were painting black stripes (gloss) on cars and then switching the paint over to paint the rocker and rear panels a semi gloss black?
788  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Rear Stripes - again on: June 09, 2007, 10:01:32 PM
Theres only one mask.  The treatment at the back end of the car was the only difference, on spoiler equipped cars (indicated by the holes in the trunklid) they just taped off the last 3" or therabouts of the trunklid.  All masks were positioned off the rear window, vinyl top molding, or convertible top trim and were always the same, 5/8" off the bottom of each or these reference points.

I really don't see how the factory could have mispositioned your stripes, they were doing at least 50 Z28's a day so it's not like it was something they weren't familiar with, and the paint and trim inspectors would have caught it and had it repaired.
789  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: wiper cct diagram on: June 05, 2007, 08:07:23 PM
Here you go.  Remeber, the wiper motor is always hot, and it grounds through the switch to the dash.
790  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Engine coding question for Van Nuys '69 Z28 on: June 04, 2007, 06:57:35 PM
It took about 3 days for the car to go from a pile of sheetmetal parts to a rolling chassis ready to accept the engine and transmission.  The 11D week probably ran from Monday 11/25 to Friday 11/29.  So the body could have been started anytime during that week.  Your VIN is after the last reported VIN built in November (L510583) so your car was finished late in the day Monday 12/2/68 and the engine was probably installed late in the day Friday 12/29/68.  It took roughly 2 days to ship an engine by rail from Flint to LA so an 11/25 built engine is definately possible for your car.
791  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Rear Stripes - again on: June 04, 2007, 05:52:01 AM
If you have brazing material in the original holes, then the trunklid or at least the paint on it is not original,  The factory did not braze the original emblem holes shut when a spoiler was installed they just put a peice of tape over each hole and bolted the spoiler over it, and I doubt that a dealer would do that either, since it would require the lid to be repainted.
792  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Z10 trim plate on: May 22, 2007, 07:02:54 PM
The last Norwood April VIN recorded by GM is 637106 (this was the last car out the door on the 2nd shift on 4/30/69), and at that point there was at least another 2 days of 04 dated cars in the que (April 30th was a Wednesday).  My car is 6369xx and its an 04L dated car.  636136 is fine for a late 04C built car.
793  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Z10 trim plate on: May 18, 2007, 04:16:28 PM
It's fine.
794  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 RS z/28 Barn Find on: May 15, 2007, 11:13:39 AM

This orange/orange/black convertible is not original, nor was it originally a Big block.  The a/c evaporator housing is from a small block.  Houndstooth wasn't available in convertibles except for the pacecars, I beleive both the orange and yellow houndstooth was announced as being available in Feb or 69 for coupes only.
795  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: YH wheel dates correct for my Z? on: May 14, 2007, 05:36:19 AM
Mine are YJ wheels on an RS/SS.
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 63
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 18 queries.