CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2014, 02:18:00 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107493 Posts in 12505 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 28
331  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 07, 2011, 01:47:02 AM
Is ANYBODY out there willing to measure your original driveshaft and provide that information? 

Especially interested in Big Block cars...manual trans or TH400.  Thanks.
332  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: March 20, 2011, 03:46:47 PM
Rich,

Thanks for those links.  I had read most of them previously.  The offset question is probably not one that can be easily answered, but I thought I would ask people who had originals to try to figure this out. 

Maybe I should just take this one step at a time, but I figured if people were going to take the time to look at what they had it might be easiest to just get all the iinformation at once.

So for now...what I think I have figured out is the following for lengths.  This is from AMA specs and some other Chevrolet sources. For 67 and 68 cars with the 396, different frame mounts for the engine were used which pulled the engine forward about 1/2 to 3/4 inch.  Also note the holes for the 396 crossmember for use with a manual transmission had the transmission mounting holes about 3/4 inch forward.  The PG, TH350, 3 speed manual and 4 speed manual transmissions are all close to 27 5/8 or 27 3/4 inches long (including bellhousing length).  But the TH400 is slightly longer - around 28 1/4 inches.

67 and 68 Camaros used two different lengths.  49.96 inches for all applications except the 396 with manual trans which was 50.46 inches.

69 Camaros all used the same length, 49.56 inches.  This appears to be due to the frame mounts all being the same for the big blocks and small blocks.  Although I can't find anything listed, it seems the TH400 driveshaft should be slightly shorter.

So that is why I am looking for actual measurements, to confirm these numbers.  If anyone has different information, please post it and list your source.

Bryon
333  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: March 16, 2011, 12:12:18 PM
Several people are working on putting together original driveshaft information for 67-69 Camaros. Items of most interest at this point are below.

If you have an original driveshaft and would be willing to post information about your car, it would be very much appreciated. Here is what to include...

Year of car
Norwood or Los Angeles car
Month and week of vehicle assembly
Engine
Transmission
Driveshaft length (measured center of u joint to center of u joint)
Type of attachment to pinion yoke. There are two types: U bolts and the strap and bolts method.
Code stamped on front of passenger side axle tube.
Paint stripes and a picture (if possible)
Position of the u-joint flanges on each end. Some cars were "in-line" and others were "clocked" about 30 degrees off from each other

Post in this thread if you want. If you would rather not post, but still contribute, send an email to me please. Thanks.

Bryon

*** Modified 3/18/2014 to remove casting number.  Most don't have it and it is a forging number on the yoke.  ***




334  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / 19N619915 M20 on ebay on: January 21, 2011, 02:36:56 PM
19N619915 - it looks like your M20 is on ebay at this time.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Muncie-M-21-Transmission-/160535214714

Sorry if this was already posted.  I looked but did not see anything.
335  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 19N658191 DZ 302 on eBay on: January 15, 2011, 12:21:11 PM
Buy it now price is 6500 but will also let you submit an offer.  That is cheap if you own the car.  If not, probably still way too high.
336  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / 19N669364 M22 trans on: December 13, 2010, 09:30:15 PM
19N669364

I have your M22 case.  Assembly date is P9A24C.  I know that is quite a difference in date from transmission assembly to vehicle assembly but stamp appears genuine.
337  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / 18N352037 Muncie on: August 07, 2010, 12:55:53 PM
Your Muncie is on ebay at this time.

Sorry if this one is already listed.  I did a quick search and did not see it.

Item number: 360287602558
338  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / 18L332291 V022IM0 on: August 04, 2010, 01:54:43 PM
Looks like your engine is on ebay.

Sorry if this was already posted.  I searched and did not find anything listed for this partial VIN.

18L332291  V022IM0

Item number: 220648237977
339  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: RE: 1969 Z28 Camaro with Fake Cowl Tag, 9N607652 on: July 10, 2010, 11:50:55 AM
I agree 100 percent on that.
340  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / 8N404816 POP on: July 07, 2010, 02:04:35 PM
If this is your car, contact me.  I have your Protect-o-Plate in the original book.  Has dealer stamped information in the back.

8N404816
341  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers on 69 Muncie 4 speed linkage on: April 26, 2010, 11:40:42 AM
It appears the 0073 rod I have is the 3-4 rod for 68 Camaro small block.  Not sure on the others.  Might be for Impala or Chevelle.

Looks like for 68 the rods are

Small block  Rods    1&2 3930071     3&4 3930073     Reverse 3930075
Big block     Rods    1&2 3930063     3&4 3930065     Reverse 3930067
342  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers on 69 Muncie 4 speed linkage on: April 21, 2010, 04:59:52 PM
OK I did some searching around and found some numbers, so I thought I would post them.  I hope they are accurate.

1969 Muncie shifters
OEM shifter housing is stamped 3138
OEM Round stick #5325, slips into the yoke and is held by a tang

OEM Hurst Linkage
302, 350 & 396 CID       Lever Arms    1&2 8541,     3&4 8541,     Reverse 5769.
302, 350                      Rods            1&2 1876,     3&4 1885,      Reverse 5765,    Reverse Lockout 5773.
396                             Rods            1&2 5775,     3&4 5777,      Reverse 5779,    Reverse Lockout 5776.

But I still have no idea what the rods I have are originally from.
343  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers on 69 Muncie 4 speed linkage on: April 21, 2010, 02:14:02 PM
OK, I can check that for some cars.  But I don't have an AIM for every car. 

Does ANYYONE know of a listing of shifter rod numbers for multiple years?
344  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers on 69 Muncie 4 speed linkage on: April 20, 2010, 05:21:14 PM
Well I looked them all over closely.  A few are are marked.  Here are the ones marked 0073, 96117, 5612, U, D.

A couple also have a mark that lookis like an M over a W.

Any idea what the ones that are marked are for?  All of these have a thickness about 7/16 inch?

None of these may be correct.  Even the ones that are not marked.
345  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers on 69 Muncie 4 speed linkage on: April 19, 2010, 01:10:43 PM
OK, that helps.  But are the big block rods any thicker than the small block rods?

And does anyone have any good pictures so I can compare?  I did see the ones in Jerry's 69 book, but
hard to do a physcial comparison with a photo that smalll.

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 28
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 18 queries.