CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 06:33:24 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102505 Posts in 12092 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: CE coded warranty engines on: May 12, 2014, 08:57:25 PM
Answers

1.  All warranty engines from that engine plant, not a specific engine.
2.  Yes.  In 1969 I believe the warranty was 5 years or 50,000 miles.
3.  Quote from link below "This numbering system applies to service engine assemblies, partial engines, fitted cylinder cases, cylinder cases".

See this link.
http://www.camaros.org/engine.shtml#ReplacementEngines
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Earliest 3969341 and Latest 3894860 axles on: May 07, 2014, 10:50:59 PM
sorry just noticed this thread
Here is a pic of mine from a 08C ( August of 69) car.

Do you have the casting number and casting date from this rear?  Maybe I missed it in an earlier post?
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 23, 2014, 08:37:00 PM
James - thanks for the data!
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: rear end upgrade 1969 on: April 17, 2014, 11:33:03 AM
Tom

See this link.

http://www.stevesnovasite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36301
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: rear end upgrade 1969 on: April 10, 2014, 04:33:47 AM
Let's see some pics of what you have first.

I would lead you away from a 12 bolt from an A body car.  The Chevelles had the Chevy type 12 bolt but most of the Buick, Olds, Pontiac "sister" cars to the Chevelle like the GTO got the BOP 12 bolt - and that is not what you want.  They also had the "ears" on the top of the center section.  Not ideal for a 69 Camaro since these are not leaf spring cars.

The 8.5 inch 10 bolt Corporate rear from the 72-75 Novas (and I believe the V8 76-79 Novas) or the other "sister" cars to the Nova (Pontiac Ventura, Olds Omega, Buick Apollo) would be a good choice.  This is a direct bolt in, as mentioned earlier.  Just make sure it is the 8.5 and not the 7.5 rear.

This is interesting reading and for the most part pretty accurate.  http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/techarticles/48518_posi_10_bolt_upgrade_install/
But NO NOT use the ratchet type posi from a pickup - it will break.

But again - let's see what you have first. If you are not putting down a lot of power, an 8.2 rear may be fine for your needs.
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 Z engine parts on: April 02, 2014, 10:00:02 AM
In regards to a hone, I would look at it this way. 

1. See if you can borrow one from someone.  I don't have one right now, otherwise I would send one to you.

2. It is an investment, and something you need.  If you think you are only going to use it once, you should be able to sell it to someone for at least half of what you paid for it.  Otherwise, keep it for future use.

Good luck!
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Carb Finish on: April 01, 2014, 03:16:48 PM
I started to take the top of the carb off, then changed my mind.  Did try to take a few pics of the inside though.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Carb Finish on: March 31, 2014, 12:44:12 AM
I will see about taking the top off the carb in the next few days and try to post some more pics.
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Lower Rev LO rod for '69 Z28 (late) on: March 29, 2014, 03:20:32 PM
Gary, give me a few days to check.  I may have an original 5773 rod.  If so, I will let you know.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Carb finish on: March 29, 2014, 11:52:36 AM
One more.  Looks like it was donated in 1969. 
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Carb finish on: March 29, 2014, 11:52:12 AM
A couple more pics.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original Carb Finish on: March 29, 2014, 11:51:23 AM
I picked up this carburator the other day.  It is a 7028210 EE carb dated 3627 (362nd day of 1967) for 1968 396/325 hp automatic.

The carb was a GM donated carb for Education purposes, so it saw no use.  It has been slightly modified for teaching purposes and also I assume to disable it from just being taken and bolted onto a car for use.  Also has a sticker on it that says "DONATED BY GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES".

See these images and I will try to post more later.  They are good references for what an assembly line part looked like.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hmmm, "complete bumber to bumber" restored 69 Z on: March 27, 2014, 02:11:42 PM
We don't need images like that on this site. 
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: March 18, 2014, 09:15:26 PM
Thank You James.  That is the correct length as far as I know.  All 69s should be the same length. 

If you do some cleaning, I would not use anything abrasive. Try some WD40 first to see what that does.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: March 15, 2014, 08:08:54 PM
Bump...

Anybody else have data to share?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 18 queries.