CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 20, 2014, 03:53:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107566 Posts in 12508 Topics by 4812 Members
Latest Member: oldbop88
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 28
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: NBR ON 69 TRIM TAGS on: December 03, 2014, 09:38:13 PM
Seems they are 09A or 10A tags.

Do you know the VIN of the car this tag is on?  

32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: NBR ON 69 TRIM TAGS on: December 03, 2014, 09:35:33 PM
I believe it was an error only for a short time.  Let me check to see what I can find.  

1500 or so cars. 

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=168314
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Example of a fairly accurate ebay ad .. 'ez restoration'... :) on: December 03, 2014, 08:10:08 PM
That is a funny description.  Item has 35 bids.  It will sell!    Smiley

Isetta collectors are eccentric.   Cheesy
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: This Pic got me thinking.. on: December 02, 2014, 05:31:10 PM
Pic is in another thread.  I would still like to know more details about pic and possible build month/week of the car.
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10034.0;all

Details of the pic
It looks like it was posted on Camaros.net back in 2007.  
169Indy wrote: "I have a GM photo, copy (SCANNED) of the 68 Z28 engine bay photo that was printed in the Camaro Enthusiast a few years ago and rarely see people reference it with regards to details. Appears to be a Norwood car as evidence by the PTB stampings."
Ed Bertrand posted the picture for 169Indy.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: This Pic got me thinking.. on: December 02, 2014, 02:52:28 PM
Based on the CT on the Fuel Mixture Control Valve - I believe it is an early 1968 Z28.
See the table here.
http://www.camaros.org/emissions.shtml#valves

And if that is the case, I am bit surprised there is a lack of white paint on the trim tag.
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: This Pic got me thinking.. on: December 02, 2014, 02:40:23 PM
Darrell, where is the picture from?  Any history on the picture?

I am going to take a bit of time and look over things closely to see if I can add any thoughts.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 29, 2014, 03:03:10 PM
Vince, the intake does seem a little early, but it may be OK. Is the carb there?
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 28, 2014, 12:43:44 PM
Mike, I am sorry, but I don't have a good answer for your question.  It may have something to do with that, but I am not sure.
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 28, 2014, 11:23:28 AM
Mike, there is even a lot of variability in the L35 cars for April of 67 at LOS.  

There are some known cars with early April body assemblies that have late March assembled engines.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 28, 2014, 10:01:50 AM
Not exactly answering your question, but it is related.

I have seen numerous small block cast on one day and assembled the next (based on casting date and assembly stamp). 

Also saw one assembled the same day it was cast.  I imagine that was cast at the start of the day and assembled at the end. 
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 27, 2014, 01:21:29 PM
Too many factors to give a definite answer.  Yes, it depended on the power train combination, number of cars that were being built that week, supply and demand, what was being ordered by the dealers, etc. 

Some dates are tight together, others not so much. Yes, common parts in general had tighter dates, but even that varied.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need Help with Partial VIN Engine Stamp on: November 16, 2014, 01:30:43 PM
I am interested in seeing the complete engine pad area without anything blurred out. 

43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vin for data base on: November 14, 2014, 05:00:54 PM
I honestly doubt the 3846429 tailhousing on the transmission is original, but that's not a big deal.  Could have been replaced.  

Rest of the transmission sounds original. I did not see the transmission stamped information pic?

Metal tag is correct for 1968 Camaro, M20, 3.07 and 3.31 rear axle.  (AIM says M20 with L34, L35, L48)
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Lost 1969 DZ on: November 14, 2014, 04:45:55 PM
Mike, good luck in your search but chances of finding it are very very close to zero without the VIN.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: October 29, 2014, 03:17:08 PM
Thanks Clint!
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 28
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 18 queries.