CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2015, 11:54:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112293 Posts in 12900 Topics by 4937 Members
Latest Member: 22rodman
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 35
241  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: March 15, 2014, 08:08:54 PM
Bump...

Anybody else have data to share?
242  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Polishing glass on: February 26, 2014, 11:35:43 AM
Bill, we need to know how bad it is.  If you run your fingernail across that area, does it catch?  First thing to try is some GOOD glass cleaner and a newspaper.

Personally, if it is not bad, and it your case it sounds like it isn't, I would leave it alone if the above suggestion does not work.
243  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / Re: MO302 partial vin of 18L335817 on: February 25, 2014, 01:59:24 AM
If a dime won't fit between the intake valve and the exhaust valve, the valves are 2.02 intake and 1.60 exhaust. It's and old timers trick.   Wink
244  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 20, 2014, 06:18:25 PM
Unless you can guarantee those are original paint cars, I would not go by them.  And you have shown both the D90 and D91 stripes.  Your early 1968 model year car (I would not call it a late 1967 build, that is confusing) would have the D91, as you indicate.  I am not sure if the location is the same on both the D91 and D90.  Looking at the AIM, they appear to be different size.

Also see this link.  Images of stripes were taken from the GM Vehicle information kits so they should be "fairly" representative.

http://www.camaros.org/exterior.shtml#stripes

I will also check to see what is show in some other 68 literature.
245  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 20, 2014, 05:42:29 PM
Ed, I believe all of the original cars that I have seen have had the emblem centered in the stripe.
246  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CRG YouTube Channel on: February 20, 2014, 11:38:13 AM
Six new videos have been uploaded in the past several hours.  These are from one of the 1967 Chevrolet Communication Kits - the one released in November of 1966.  Videos include Opportunity for More Sales, 67 Flat Rate Schedule, Who Me, Meeting the Market with the 67 Chevrolet, Just an Ordinary Guy and Rally Around Camaro. 

Thank You Daniel for these additions!

Again, here is the link to the CRG YouTube channel.
http://www.youtube.com/user/CamaroResearchGroup
247  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 19, 2014, 11:55:16 AM
Just my opinion, but those are not the same, and law enforcement knows the difference.

Panel replacement (and documenting each step) is probably OK and is not the "easy way out". 

Moving a VIN tag to a rust free body is a VIN swap.


248  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 19, 2014, 10:24:45 AM
Again, just my opinion, but...

If the VIN tag stays on the original body, and each part replaced is done one at a time and documented with photos at each step, that is probably OK.

Moving the VIN tag from a car to another body is not OK. 
249  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 19, 2014, 09:58:05 AM
In my opinion, a "rebody" is the same as a "VIN swap" and should be handled the same.
250  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear axle code on: February 19, 2014, 04:39:54 AM
I picked up the car about 16 years ago in Cottonwood, AZ. It's an Az car as far as I know, don't know what deal ship it came from but live to know. I've not done much to it other than drive and enjoy it. It has A/C and a counsel. Has the standard interior in white. Body is straight and solid. I replaced the headliner and the 2 front bucket because of tears in the material. You all have been very informative.
Thanks!
Here are the codes from the tranny:
Case - 3925660
Tail House - 3857584
Side Cover - 388468
Stamp - P8D15, 39514, C18

Can you post a picture of the area with the P8D15 stamped code? 

And could the rest of it be CT8 39514 rather than C18?  If so, it is a 1968 replacement transmission, assembled April 15, 1968.
251  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 18, 2014, 05:52:11 PM
I am not an expert on tags, never will be.  But if I was buying the car with that tag, I would pay with $3 bills.    Cool
252  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Camaro VIN check on: February 02, 2014, 08:46:26 PM
Do you have anything regarding this VIN ?
124379L517385

RPOZ11 -

What can you tell us about the car?  What is the trim tag data?
253  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Earliest 3969341 and Latest 3894860 axles on: January 29, 2014, 09:57:26 PM
Thanks for posting the pics!
254  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Muncie Transmission tag (pn?) on: January 22, 2014, 09:43:02 PM
Gary, what ratio rear axle do you have?  The normal 3.73?  That part number was used for 3.55, 3.73 and I think 4.10 in 1969.
255  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: crayon marks behind rear seat on: January 22, 2014, 09:36:40 PM
Has anyone ever found any marks in this area on 68 Camaros?
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 35
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 18 queries.