CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 28, 2014, 01:26:00 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102432 Posts in 12087 Topics by 4667 Members
Latest Member: hrascoll
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 22
211  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: July 07, 2011, 10:52:59 AM
Anyone else with a 67 or 68 big block car and manual transmission with an original driveshaft who would like to share driveshaft info ?
212  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: July 07, 2011, 10:37:11 AM
Thanks Rob and Bob.  Yes, it appears that a length of 49.96 inches is correct for 67 and 68 big block cars with TH400.

I can not say for sure, but the u joints you have are probably original.
213  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: July 04, 2011, 07:30:05 PM
Thanks Rob.  That would be awesome.  
214  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: June 30, 2011, 09:43:48 AM
Thanks Paul.

I looked at one yesterday.  49.5 inches center of u joint to center of u joint.
The owner was about 90 percent sure that it was from a 1969 Camaro TH400
car that he junked out after it was wrecked about 30 years ago.
It had what appeared to be an original TH400 yoke on it.  The u joints were in line.  
I could not find any stripes on it.

Fixed typo
215  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: June 24, 2011, 09:59:35 AM
Anybody else want to post - please.
216  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: LSD diff tag on: June 14, 2011, 04:49:03 AM
I have not seen one on a 67-69 Camaro either. 

I have seen one on a 69 Buick Skylark and I am pretty sure it was original.   
217  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decoding a 02D 1969 Z/28 Transmission P9B18(O) on: June 02, 2011, 11:33:32 PM
The D and N suffix was only used for PowerGlide and TH350.  Never used for Muncies.

You are going to have to post some better pics if we are going to figure this out. 
218  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Shift plate on: June 01, 2011, 01:35:38 PM
i will have to check.  It might take a while, but I have an original in storage.
219  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 BLACK 396 cars got a different black tail panel paint than the body on: June 01, 2011, 10:08:32 AM
I think those two cars were either anomalies, repainted at some point (possibly at the dealership) or maybe touched up at the factory (goes with the orange peel idea) and wrong gun was used.  Guy that did the back tail panels was probably used to picking a certain gun and picked the one he used for other non-Black cars.  This was assembly line stuff.  The guys developed habits after doing things a certain way thousands of times.  Throw something slightly different into the mix and errors happened.
220  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Shift plate on: May 27, 2011, 11:27:31 PM
I believe there should be some chrome showing on the edge.
221  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: May 09, 2011, 09:08:01 AM
Any original 67 or 68 big block TH400 cars out there???
222  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: May 03, 2011, 06:41:44 PM
Thanks Marty. 

223  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 29, 2011, 11:20:03 PM
Thanks Ed.  It does look like white and orange stripes to me.

224  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 27, 2011, 07:15:54 PM
OK, I need to clarfiy something. The number that are on the yokes are not casting numbers, those are forging numbers.  From what I have been able to find out so far, they are not Camaro specific, so they may not be of much use in this research.

But thanks for all of the information so far.  Any PLEASE keep posting!  Especially any 67 or 68 big block cars.
225  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 26, 2011, 01:20:19 PM

The most important question to be answered in any of this discussion (at least for 1969 IMO) is why the vast majority of driveshafts had offset u-joints and yet some of the more powerful engine / transmission options had the u-joints in phase.

Rich I appreciate your input - but that is not why I started this thread.  

That question has been tossed around for years and years.  As for WHY?, I don't think we will ever find an answer to that question.  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 22
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 18 queries.