CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 01, 2015, 08:02:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110392 Posts in 12749 Topics by 4888 Members
Latest Member: gchase67
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
46  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Gas mileage 6 cyl on: January 12, 2011, 08:17:46 PM
230 cu. in. L6, 3 speed manual, 3.08 differential - 25 mpg at 60 mph.
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: January homepage on: January 07, 2011, 09:38:00 AM
Here are more pictures of my car, the January home page 1968.
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: January homepage on: January 06, 2011, 07:35:30 AM
I bought the 1968 Sport Coupe featured on this month's home page from the original owner in 1988. It is an original everything survivor having only one option, A01 tinted glass all windows. As stated, it has the original Teal Blue LL paint and 717 Blue interior. It also has the original 230 cu. in. L6 and 3 speed column shift transmission.
The car is documented with the P.O.P, copy of the original title, dealer packet and owner maintenance records and receipts from day one. I love this car. Joe.
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 A.I.M. on: October 31, 2010, 07:26:23 AM
Thanks everyone for your input. Joe.
50  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Quantity Of Original 67 250's Remaining on: October 31, 2010, 07:25:42 AM
Insp4. I'm curious about the double-groove water pump pulley with no belt in the front groove. Since your car is equiped with the CCS anti-polution system, the extra pulley couldn't be for an A.I.R. pump. Is it for a power steering pump which isn't hooked up or some other use?
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1968 A.I.M. on: October 27, 2010, 03:33:29 PM
Before purchasing an A.I.M. for my 1968 coupe, I'd like to know if there is more than one publisher and if so which one is best from a quality and readability point of view.
I understand that some pages may be light and difficult to read. I'm particularly interested in the A.I.R. (smog) system for my L6 engine, so can anyone with a 1968 A.I.M. tell me if that section is of good quality? Thank you. Joe.
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: #1108367 starter on: September 26, 2010, 06:39:57 AM
1968 - 302, 327/2BC
1969 - 302, 307, 327
1970 - 307
1971-72 - 307
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Date correct alternator for 12C '68 L34 on: September 16, 2010, 08:16:52 AM
My68SS. That incorrect alternator you're replacing, would it happen to be an 1100813 dated no later than the first week of April 1968? Thanks, Joe.
54  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Quantity Of Original 67 250's Remaining on: September 11, 2010, 04:52:07 PM
Here's a picture of my 3 speed column shift radio delete 1968 coupe. I don't know how many were produced but I've never seen another. Joe.
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Torque Drive and A.I.R. (smog) on: September 11, 2010, 07:56:30 AM
Just out of curiosity, for 68 and 69, were torque drive equiped cars considered automatics or manuals to determine whether they should have an A.I.R. (smog) system installed? Thanks, Joe.
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Sorry the forum was down on: September 07, 2010, 10:09:13 AM
Thanks for your efforts in keeping the CRG going. Joe.
57  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Quantity Of Original 67 250's Remaining on: September 07, 2010, 10:06:09 AM
Insp4. Does your car still have the smog setup? If so, could you post a picture of it as I'm reinstalling mine. Is your alternator p/n 1100813? Thanks, Joe.
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Sub-frame to Radiator Support mtg. holes-Front one ever used? on: August 11, 2010, 06:37:38 AM
The front holes are used on mine. My car has never been taken apart so rest assured that that is how the car was factory assembled.
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Assembling Components Onto Engines Time Line on: August 09, 2010, 07:29:58 AM
That's even more impressive; the bolt-on components being assembled the same week as the car assembly. Out of curiosity, are there owners out there whose component build dates don't follow this pattern, meaning the component assembly date falls before the engine assembly date?
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Assembling Components Onto Engines Time Line on: August 08, 2010, 08:11:39 AM
Thanks John for a very informative article. I'm surprised that production planning was quite tight for over 40 years ago. My engine, transmission and starter where assembled on March 14, 20 and 29 respectively and installed in my 04A coupe.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 18 queries.