CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 20, 2014, 11:20:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103299 Posts in 12153 Topics by 4689 Members
Latest Member: merle
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3]
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: HOW LONG HAVE YOU HAD YOUR CAR AND WHAT DID YOU PAY FOR IT ? on: December 04, 2009, 09:33:29 PM
1969 Camaro SS350 with Protecto Plate. 350-300hp, Muncie 3sp, 3.31 open 12 bolt, AM radio, rear speaker, Lemans blue, black vinyl roof. No other options. Owned 38 1/2 years and paid 2495.00. Now has ZZ3 and M20 with 3.73 posi. Jim 
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Clutch won't disengage on: June 23, 2009, 09:05:42 PM
If you are using the factory clutch, 3892632 is the correct fork. If the Zoom is what I call a "high cone" style pressure plate you will have to use another fork. I am using a Hays diaphragm 11" clutch and am using the early Corvette fork p/n 3887177. This will allow floorboard clearance. This is in a '69 SS350 w/Muncie 4 sp. If you can see inside the bellhousing (through the clutch fork hole), make sure that the T/O bearing is not against the bearing retainer. I ran into a problem similar to yours 30yrs ago with a Schiefer unit. Hope this helps. Jim
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Clutch won't disengage on: June 23, 2009, 04:25:42 PM
I second what Stingr69 said. If you have the wrong T/O bearing arm it will not allow the clutch to work properly if at all. Also the disc may be backwards but I think it would have been hard to start or tighten the bolts. Either way you will probably have to disassemble and look at it. Good luck. Jim
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Dipstick tube 69Z on: March 16, 2009, 07:38:17 PM
I believe the tube you need is 7-1/4". This would correspond to the dimensions of the dipstick given on the ebay auction. I also measured  one I have and they are the same. Hope this helps. Jim
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Competition plus rods on: March 15, 2009, 11:19:47 AM
P/N for Hurst shifter w/stick is 391-4339 shifter w/o stick is 391-4340; 1-2 rod is 213-5307; 3-4 is 213-2145; rev is 213-3691. P/N for complete kit (shifter and installation kit) is 291-6561. This is for 67-68 Camaro with or with out console. Hope this helps. Jim
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Merry Christmas! on: December 24, 2008, 10:35:27 PM
Merry Christmas to you too Jerry; and to everyone on this board a safe and enjoyable holiday!
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 1969 Big Block Failed to Start! on: December 03, 2008, 10:54:28 PM
Check your battery cables. I had a similar problem 30 yrs. ago. Car would not start after being driven. After it sat for a while cooled down it would start. Turned out to be a battery cable that was broken internally. Jim
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Backing plates on: December 03, 2008, 05:24:35 PM
As per catalog those numbers are also for 69-72 Chevelle; 69-72 Chevy; 73-74 Nova and 69 Camaro w/o JL-8. These numbers are found in gr 5.002. I did look at my '69 SS and the numbers you have are what is stamped on the backing plate. The numbers in the catalog may be revised numbers. Hope this helps. Jim
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Backing plates on: December 02, 2008, 11:45:30 PM
The part numbers you are looking for should be 5463565 (left hand) and 5463566 (right hand). These numbers are from rev 5/80 Chevrolet catalog. Hope this helps. Jim
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: crager ss wheels help ???? on: January 13, 2008, 10:22:12 AM
I think the spoke has changed somewhat. There was a discussion on another board about this not lond ago. I have not had a chance to compare side by side.  Maybe someone who has actually seen them can chime in. Jim
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69Z Camaro tail lamp question on: October 02, 2007, 09:20:28 PM
I have  #67's  on the inner lenses and these work well. Hope this helps. Jim
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.