CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 25, 2014, 12:20:37 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102347 Posts in 12080 Topics by 4664 Members
Latest Member: jjonesls1
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15
181  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 Camaro Z/28 RS Parking Lamp Plating on: December 06, 2008, 04:17:58 PM
I worked with a friend on gathering a 'Batch' of Camaro parts requiring plating and we found a Seattle area plater that welcomed Hobby plating and we pooled our parts and sent them out for plating.
Appx COST is Very inexpensive-affordable! Shop around, you might get luck locally Smiley

85$ min-per rack and you prep the parts and a RACK was HUGE, they plate AIRPLANE parts around here (Think the BIG "B" flying ALUM TUBE Co.) so you can imagine the Rack was appx 4' x 8'  and it was up to you whether you had 2 pcs or 100's what ever would fit on the RACK. Very good turn around and great quality. This one did , Zinc, Cad, Gavl, Nickel, Anodz,,etc...

182  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 Camaro Z/28 RS Parking Lamp Plating on: December 06, 2008, 04:05:57 PM
 Smiley
DIY
You Can Do IT!!!!!!
if you have access to a plate shop.

To determine the color of plating scrape some of the interior surface white paint. Mine were yellow (Di-Chro-Cad)

Carefully open up the fold-crimped socket from the housing- Use Screwdrivers, small needle nose pliers & take your time to unfold the crimp and work the bronze socket loose from the light stamp steel shell.
Seperate and feed wire thru the hole.

I glass beaded the remaining white paint on the interior and solvent cleaned the back side this was done so as to not change the texture of the back side of the stamped steel housing. Blasting changes the surface prfile and this affects the sheen of the plating.
183  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1968 Horns on: December 06, 2008, 03:45:35 PM
E-mail sent with Photos of a 67 SS/RS.
Hope that it helps.

Jim
184  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 Tail Light Bezels - Which Ones? on: August 26, 2008, 11:18:50 PM
Jeff, I think I sprung for the molded repops (gaskets) and used them to mount on fresh paint. The Orig GMs were intact but had taken a 'SET' and were not going to transfer well. The CHQ bezels had no issues with fitment to the tail panel.
I did use the OE style nuts and pre threaded them on the bench VERY, VERY carefully so the in car install would go smoother and minimize potential for stud shear when leaning in trunk to tighten.

An interesting side note: I took the GM tail lamp housing sheet metal backs and had them clear (silver) zinc plated [I know they were galv plated originally] but they look awesome! Also there is a small hole in the sheet metal back that has a little white/beige fiber plug installed allowing venting of the housing, they get browned out from age, just turn it around and stick the fresh side out for a clean restored look.

Jim
185  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 Tail Light Bezels - Which Ones? on: August 24, 2008, 01:36:23 PM
My experiance with the CHQ bezels (1968) was as Follows:
Order NEW Bezels, Receive NEW bezels;
Order NEW RS lenses, Receive NEW Lenes (RS).
Try to install NEW Plastic Lens into NEW Bezels,
NO FIT!!!!!!

So in the end I found that the raised RS platstic lens required machining a very small portion of the raised area around the inboard short side of the lens. I took the lens to a mill machine at my dads and chucked up a 3/8" end mill and shaved a very small portion of the raised area of the plastic lens so that the lens would seat into the new bezel. (Note: I think the NEW lens would not fit into the GM OLD bezel as well) If I remember it was only about a 1/64" required removal to allow the lens to (pop!) in and be fully seated. I tryed to File fit at first but the lens material was tough and it was hard to maintian parrallel etc. Lenses were from a vendor and I can not remember what the packaging was like (i.e. whom sold-mfg?)

BTW: I was very happy with the CHQ -vs- OER quality of the bezel, as others have stated you should be happy with CHQ offerings at this time.

Jim
186  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1968 camaro (BIG BLOCK?) on: July 22, 2008, 09:11:33 PM
Post a picture of the fuel line.
It contains a clue
3/8" single with BB specific termination.

Details avail in the Assy Manual.

Jim
187  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: sleeves for power steering hoses on: June 15, 2008, 01:38:35 PM
Sleeve
.75" ID
1.250" OD

Oil soaked, deteriorated originals on a PS 1968 396 LOS car.

I have not found it avail via repop houses. We use a very similar material to insulate pipes on Submarines trade name 'Aramflex Insulation' I need to see if they have it in the above size. The color, density, shape, feel is very similar.

Jim
188  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct locaton of proportionong valve on sub frame on: June 15, 2008, 01:23:09 AM
Here is an disassy view of the valve from the subframe:

Jim
189  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67-68 Brake Line Clip attachment on: June 08, 2008, 03:06:26 PM
What Method or Tool is used to properly secure NEW 1967-1968 Brake line (also 3/8" Fuel Line) Clip asm Part Number 3881339 to the Body or subframe.

The new clip is in the AMK book Page 150 Part Number B-10317, Red, double ended clip w/ 0.27" rivet.

The ASM manual (68) shows a detail of the clip with a "PUSH RIVET". page 123.

The new clips from AMK & Others appear to have the rivet as part of the clip. I am not sure how folks have been Clinching or Bucking this tight to the car structure?

Thanks

Jim
190  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct locaton of proportionong valve on sub frame on: June 06, 2008, 12:39:33 AM
Does anyone know of a source for the soft goods for owner rebuild of the subframe mounted:
"pressure regulating valve" or "proportioning valve" by whatever name,,,
1968 disc brake car w/ drivers side subframe mounted in-line pressure <do-hickey>

I have unmounted mine and removed the hex head cap screw and 1 rubber "V"-grooved cup seal and washer, to the point of a external snap ring and am not sure what lies beneath,,,,Lots of 'gunk' so I was interested in further disassy and cleaning, just was checking if others have dug into this component and sources for the soft goods needed to PROPERLY rebuild it, otherwise its just a careful cleaning and reassembly,,,

Thanks,

Jim
191  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 RS/SS Camaro 396? on: June 03, 2008, 02:17:09 PM
Post a DETAILED picture of the Fuel line termination and retension (Clips style and location) in the saddle of the subframe.
If it is untouched (Hacked) it provides a BB specific clue,,,one of many
Above link is great.

Jim
192  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 leaf spring finish/Plastic pads on: May 25, 2008, 11:15:28 PM
Has anybody had any luck finding the anti-squeek pads ? Eaton detroit spring said they don't have them and can't get them .Steve .

When I "REBUILT" [Disasy, Blast, Prime, Paint, New Center bolt, New pads, Press in new bushing, & Assemble], my original 5 leaf (68) springs. I found that I had to search for local spring shops and encountered sourcing issues with the black plastic 'PADS'. Eventually found a shop in seattle that had some laying around 0.50$ each.

My advise is to ask around your area shops and see if they have any.

I was under the impression they were avail as part of the Camaro rest vendor rebuild Kits for 50$ a few years back?

Jim
193  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Unusual 69 paint inspection marks - are these correct? on: May 25, 2008, 10:40:29 PM
first time you washed your car that stuff was gone.  as a former chevrolet dealer i know this as fact.

I would counter that when I cleaned up the front end and rear end on my 1968 ssrs 396/325 80K mile car I found that years of grease, road dirt, oil and dealer undercoating preserved tons of Factory (VN) applied graffiti.

Interesting Examples found:
Green dabs on rear axle centers.
Yellow dabs on the front disk brake wheel stud ends
White and Orange on the spindles.
Yellow on the tie rod sleeves
Large orange dab on the rear axel center housing
Drive line stripes
Etc..

Now do not get me wrong,,, I have made a TON of mistakes on my car over the years and am slow to correct.
I do enjoy the details!

Jim
194  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 69 decklid emblem holes on: April 19, 2008, 08:58:06 PM
Z11 (04C) VN build
2 sets.

Jim
195  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 bumper jack on: April 07, 2008, 08:17:49 PM


Jim, that’s apparently the correct sticker for a 68 but IMO it's only correct for cars built after that date.  I know my car had the 3909124; I took a picture of the original Thank God!  I would say that would be the correct one for your car also.  Thanks for the info.

 
[/quote]

Do they repop the instruction sheet (coupe) #  3909124?
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.11 seconds with 18 queries.