CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2015, 11:57:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112096 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16
151  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Trans Detent Cable on: February 20, 2011, 10:02:50 PM
If you are talking about the Console shifter cable.
I purchased Offshore repop & GM for my 68TH400 car and I had to file-elongate the slot in the end fitting to get proper length to detent alignment. I then purchased a GM version for my69 Pace car 350/300 th350 floor shifted car and it fit like a glove.

Cable Asm Trans 03956765 GR.4.047
GM PART # 3956765
CATEGORY: All
PACK QTY: 1
CORE CHARGE: $0.00


 List Price: $101.93
Price: $59.26
You Save: $42.67 (42%) 
 
GM parts direct info above.

Jim W
152  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Fuel Line Removal 69 Coupe - How To on: February 20, 2011, 03:40:57 PM
I replaced my 68 Camaro single line a few years ago.
With engine installed, without loosening any subframe bolts.
For me a few key points are, Flaten-straighten out the shipping bend per mfrs instructions, use the FLOOR and unwind the bend.
I took the hack saw approch for the old line removal and made short work of the rip out.
I jacked the car up on the passanger side VERY high and secure to give the most approach angle for hreading the new line thru the subframe to body gap at the front of the door, you need some height to work with when twisting and winding threading the turns of the line thru the narrow gap. I DID have to put a very slight installation bend while getting the front installed. I then massaged out the minimal installation bends to recover the correct as installed layout.
Take your time, I did it alone but another set of hands would have been VERY apprecieated,
WALK away when you get frustrated! Have a beer and come back to the task later.
Many have done this.
Steel line, I do not care for SS material lines and would not recommend them.

Jim W
153  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Yenko on: February 20, 2011, 03:13:50 PM
Very, Very Nice

I you can do you know which vendor or brand hood you choose to use?

I have been concidering the same hood swap for my 68, it seems just like wheels,,, a set of choices just is as fun as my wife wanting 100+ pair of shoes & hairdo's. Well you know what I mean

Thanks

Jim W
154  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Front Suspension Special Tools on: February 01, 2011, 11:01:18 PM
I had access to heavy wall starter stock and a machine shop. It was nice and I used the service manual to sketch up a set to use with a hydraulic press. It was cheap because I had access to material, labor and reverse engineer based on the front end parts and tooling on hand. I have used this set up many times on 68, 69 Camaros and Chevelles. I was not happy with the Charges by a local jobber machine (Auto) shop was wanting to charge to perform the R/R of front end related parts. So I like you was looking for options. This is not something you can accomplish with galv pipe and hand tools. They (as previously) suggested offer c-clamp style tooling that can be sourced. but I went overboard and now need NO outside asstiance for Bushings, balljoints etc swap outs! The one thing I did fail at was manufactuing tooling to install (Buck) rivets in the upper ball joint to upper a arm.

Jim

poor qlty picture attached for ref only.

edit-spelling
155  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Z28 smog tubes on: January 13, 2011, 07:29:35 PM
Socket = indented
Hex Head = 'raised' Hex head
156  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Merry Christmas and Happy New Year CRG, Admins and Members!! on: December 25, 2010, 03:56:50 PM
Happy Holidays to All.

P.S. I like that photo. It reminds me of a display of Humor in the PNW by AMTRAK maintenance service employees. One year I took a photo of the Lead Locomotive on the Northbound Cascades passenger train at a station stop in Centralia,  Wa.  on the grimy nose of the lead unit (F40PH) the workers had traced a outline of Good Ole’ St. Nick as if he was met face first on the pointy end of the train- Splat!
Jim
157  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Repo delco moraine boosters. on: December 25, 2010, 03:40:04 PM
http://yellowzincplating.com/FAQ/yellow_zinc_electroplating_information.htm

Only the drawing specs mentioned earlier would denote what was required and executed at manufacture of the OEM Parts.

We (@ Puget Sound Naval Shipyard) have (Mil-spec) plated parts for Naval vessels since they installed the First Golden Rivet ,,, The plating shop used Cad as the primary conversion coating until the advent of the AirQuaility & Employee protections and started using Zinc (Inferior) in the 80's. (note the years  i.e. Cad was primary in the 60’s) They can appear cosmetically similar and variables during prep-applic-finish vary as much as making a Micro-Brew. So results will vary. One commonality is age, IT is a sacrificial coating and like a new borns skin the toll of time is manifested in changing appearance. For example you can 'Burn' the plating with ex excessive amperage, duration & solution make up. These affect the Hue & gloss and color. It is easier if you think of plating as equal to painting & the rainbow of outcomes given the variables,,,,,Your best references are poor quality (Not every one shot KodaChrome) day ½ photos and the interior surfaces that have been denied exposure that are the best source of coating appearance.

Orig Poster: Hold out for the Best,a Orig or the BEST repop that becomes avail. you can afford if you car is a Keeper. If your car is a custom or do not care about appearance options are out there, & I was not impressed with a buddies purchase of current repop from a big box vendor.

FWIW I have two Cars,,w/ restored Boosters,,,, 1 West Coast Version & 1 East Coast Version  and have recommended both directions.
I love plating & have tried the Caswell kits, Local closed (Superfund sites now) plate shops, Farmout (Restoration vendors) and Boeing contract plate shops with varying degrees of success. If anything we have over restored these vehicles to points beyond the orig manufactures standards.
Enjoy your car / project


jim
158  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1968 smog manifolds on: October 28, 2010, 08:44:24 PM


You can also use #10 x 1/2" flat-head machine screws in the holes in the exhaust manifolds (after knocking out the stainless tubes) instead of having plugs custom-made; the air manifold tube nuts then tighten down to the same dimension as if the tubes were still installed.
[/quote]

Ya, I have even heard of folks suggesting (I would not) installing roofing nails to block the passage. Not very durable in my opinion.

I removed the tube, extensions. Machined (On a Lathe I have) a tight tolerance -plug- with shaping to really seal it up good. The "head" height was calculated to acquire the same standoff distance on the smog air manifold tree tube nuts. It was fun making CHIPS! The plugs do not intrude into the exhaust manifold chamber area at all.
159  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1968 smog manifolds on: October 26, 2010, 11:29:28 PM
I just went thru something similar.
One of the A.I.R Trees rotted out from the inside and required replacement.
Twisted off two of the 4 nuts and had to machine out the thread (Nut) while not intruding i.e. damaging the manifold.
I used a series of drill bits up to the correct tap size and pulled the 'treads' of the nut out of the manifold holes,,,
then purchased (appx 40$ ouch) a 1/4-18 NPSF 4FLT STR D/S Pipe tap from Fastenal (pn 16356 Brand Greenfield Tap & Die) and chased my manifold thread for a clean fit on the new tube nuts.

P.S. also machined some custom hidden plugs that seat below the tubes as my pump is de-vaned and need to seal exhaust gases from the check vlv etc.

Jim
160  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Leaf Spring Paint on: October 18, 2010, 07:44:54 PM
Paint options:

Stove Bright Charcoal # 6201, High Temp Paint, Forrest Paint Co PO Box 22110, Eugene, OR 97402, 541-342-1821 www.forrestpaint.com

NAPA Iron Cast # 7986 (Martin Senour Paints)

The 67's seemed to have a strange tint to them

For 100 point wimps who never drive them:

Natural Steel protectant: Boeshield T-9 avail at Boat Shops (Funny) 

Jim
161  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1968 Fuel Line on: October 12, 2010, 10:34:19 PM
My 68 396/325 w/ smog has the orig line and it is JAMMED in btwn the block-cover & smog pump mounting bracket.
Amazing how tight it all is. Lots of contact. 80K mile LOS car Coded "MY"
Makes hooking up the carb a hassle and must start the threads while carb is not on studs to get the angle correct.
I have not adjusted the valves in a while but think the vlv-cover is a bear to get removed.
There must be some slack to tweak the line as needed to get things attached.

Jim
162  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: A.I.R. Pulley Mounting on: June 23, 2010, 12:10:15 AM
GM Photo

http://s61.photobucket.com/albums/h52/bertfam/?action=view&current=68Z.jpg

PN forward.

Jim
163  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Follow up to topic of floor plan plug on '69's on: March 25, 2010, 10:20:59 PM
Dave, I kind of cheated when I fluffed the underside. The dealer undercoating was SO thick I chipped-scraped it off the plugs the plating was preserved and the orig sealer held the plug perfectly that I just touched up the orig sealer with a bead of fast-n-firm. I could see some evidense of stamping but very hard to decern the text. Due to the fact I did the underbody fluff as the last item to refurb I did not  remove them for better documentation-examination and can not offer much details. I will say the  (LOS) underbody was black with lots of factory white (50-A) overspray on the underbelly pan, frame rails & trunk pan.

Jim
164  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Follow up to topic of floor plan plug on '69's on: March 21, 2010, 11:37:50 PM
I removed the plugs from both of my '69s. A couple of them had date stamps. All of them were indentation up. Can anyone point me to the correct sealer product for re-installation?

I just did the underbody make over on my pace car and I used:
3M
Fast'n Firm
Seam Sealer
Beige
08505
12.8fl-oz
(Tube- like caulk gun style)

Sets up hard and is more white-beige Perfect product.

Jim
165  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1968 SS hood ornaments on: March 10, 2010, 10:18:26 PM
Jim Here:

So, looking for data from original 1968 SS cars:
Build date, SS350 or SS396, finned or stacks


My Car 12E, SS396, LOS, Stacked!

JFW
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.318 seconds with 18 queries.