CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 06:33:36 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97283 Posts in 11694 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: engine block 3782870 9x3157 on: January 24, 2014, 10:53:05 AM
Not sure if this question should be bled into a new thread but, here we go:  According to the CanadianPoncho McKinnon table
in 1954 were ALL V8 engines destined Chevrolet, Pontiac and Oldsmobile built and assembled at the McKinnon plant ?
Thanks!
Ted
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: engine block 3782870 9x3157 on: January 23, 2014, 06:39:03 PM
Good evening Gentlemen!
The carb tag reads 7025121 and below the number is a B5 D8 30 .. Sorry re. the numerical error.
Thanks for sharing the info on  McKinnon.
Ted
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: engine block 3782870 9x3157 on: January 23, 2014, 09:08:18 AM
Thanks gentlemen!
 Back in '65, were Canadian blocks suffix-coded any differently than U.S. blocks?
Could Rochester  7025131 and intake 3866922 dated A9 5 be good on this block - date-wise?
Ted
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / engine block 3782870 9x3157 on: January 21, 2014, 04:12:07 PM
327 block, date looks like B4  5,  but suffix code 9x 3157 ? ?
Thanks!
T.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1967 Camaro Quadrajet 7037202 (AIR System) on: January 21, 2014, 04:06:17 PM
Should the number not reas 7027x x x   ?
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1968 7" L35 balancer number has last 3 digits on: October 09, 2013, 12:06:26 PM
008 or 068 ??
Thanks!
Ted
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: how about this one on: September 28, 2013, 03:57:20 AM
"On the issues with Jerry" section of the Ebay report, check the 4th paragraph in which the distributor number is short one numeric. 
It is most likely a (1) ..  All else is sooo specific..  Mebbee a typo.?.?
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Is there a Site on: September 13, 2013, 03:30:02 PM
that could be used to identify old Chevy and Pontiac engine bolts?  Talking about 50s 60s 70s 80s hardware.
Thanks!
T.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Cragar SBC Headers on: August 03, 2013, 01:24:31 PM
Were these at one time or another considered a decent header and, why did Cragar branch out into the exhaust business?
T.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Water Pump Numbers on: October 21, 2012, 05:58:30 AM
Did you find a "170" in your date range yet?  Believe I have one dated A30 9   . .
Ted
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Junior Stock site great memories eh on: September 15, 2011, 05:33:54 AM
Lotta great old time info on racers and their cars from the 50s 60's and 70's. Brought my Bud in Toronto to tears going back to those GREAT Great days when dragracing first started out, alongwith the various characters and their cars who were around at the time.. 
Great site!!
Ted
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Junior Stock site great memories eh on: September 12, 2011, 08:51:53 AM
Not promoting this site except for the fact it might, just might bring back some happy, long-forgotten times to a few 'old resident bards' www.colesy-juniorstockforum.com  ..
Enjoy!
Ted
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: opinions---CE block or close original on: February 15, 2011, 04:08:02 PM
Thanks John!!
Ted
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 centre dash panel on: February 15, 2011, 09:21:50 AM
I have a centre dash panel downstairs with woodgrain running horizontally for a non a/c car.. Hang on and I'll check out the part - I can see no GM part numbers on it either front or back.
Ted
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: opinions---CE block or close original on: February 15, 2011, 09:11:24 AM
Here you go. Again it is from a 9854 block Suffix coded ET
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.