CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 04:34:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105715 Posts in 12341 Topics by 4754 Members
Latest Member: Jake
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trim ring fit to rim on: June 05, 2014, 02:50:40 PM
Further to this post,- Today I stripped some original YH wheels dated K-1-9-1-28 YH and there was no evidence of the gouging on the rims that the finger/serrated type trim ring makes.
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: June 69 Z28 Tachs on: May 31, 2014, 08:21:38 PM
My 9A has a 6000/7000 .

9A of 68 or 69?
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: June 69 Z28 Tachs on: May 30, 2014, 12:39:11 AM
My Norwood 06A ( June 18) has a 6000/8000. owned the car since 74.

 Just recently restored a  02B LA Z28, and it had the same 6000/8000.
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: power steering hose brace on 69 on: May 19, 2014, 09:36:57 AM
That's a Full size 68-70 passenger car bracket.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: rear end for my car dating info help experts please on: May 03, 2014, 11:31:11 AM
My 06A is BU0602, car was built June 16
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 carb fuel line bracket. on: April 24, 2014, 12:07:42 AM
My 06A says Stamp Rite
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Amazing 69 Z/28 Survivor on: April 23, 2014, 01:29:56 PM
Chick, Does it have the 4 clip trim rings? or the Serrated/finger type?
I looked at the two on the left side of the car Mike and they both were the serrated finger type.

Thanks Chick, That goes along with the possability of later production finger type replacing the 4 clip style. My 06A has clips BTW.

Looking at the picture of the engine compartment you can see the original GM Decal on the side of the air cleaner, I'm pretty sure it is original, a buddy has a 20,000 mile 10B 69 Z28 and it has the cowl air cleaner with the grooved or ridged bottom.

No doubt in my mind it is a original ZL2 car, as the cowl solenoid and wiring are exactly the same as my car.

Thanks for posting the pictures, what a Time Capsule!!!!
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Amazing 69 Z/28 Survivor on: April 23, 2014, 02:00:14 AM
Chick, Does it have the 4 clip trim rings? or the Serated/finger type?
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Block crayon marks on: April 22, 2014, 05:34:47 PM
No car, it was out of a rolled 6,000 mile 70 Z28 that was wrecked around 70-71.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Block crayon marks on: April 22, 2014, 05:08:58 PM
1970 6,000 mile LT1
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Amazing 69 Z/28 Survivor on: April 21, 2014, 11:07:25 PM
Nice work Chick, would love to see more detailed photos of this important find (and who better to take them!).  Thought it was interesting to see the cowl air cleaner is a ridged bottom version.  There has been much debate if any of the ridged bottom actually made it into late production cars (vs service part) or if they were all flat bottomed.  I think this benchmark

Unless I've missed some proof that the cowl induction system was factory original on this car, that is an assumption re the 'ridged bottom'...  Just as the owner installed the Hurst shifter knob, he might have also installed the hood..  unless we have *proof* that it was factory original?   I haven't yet seen such proof...?

If the hood has a production date stamped in the rear driver side , then chances are it's a ZL2 car. I believe it to be real, Nice looking car. Kudos to your friend Chick!
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Block crayon marks on: March 29, 2014, 12:10:45 AM
I have a 6,000 mile 70 Z28 engine and CTB can clearly be seen both sides of the block . I too have seen DZ on 302.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Rear brake cable bracket. on: March 06, 2014, 07:55:02 PM
Thats the Correct Bracket
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: connecting rod reconditioning on: March 01, 2014, 01:50:03 AM
Yeah, I looked it up in the P&A and the 67 350 DID use dimple rods! I didn't realize that. I thought they were like 68 and 69 which DIDN'T use dimple rods. I've deleted my original post.

Ed


Yes they sure puzzled me the first time I saw a set, VERY Rare. I personally would use the later 3/8" bolt "pink" rod to gain bolt strength and better rod material, especially if it is a original stamp block.

Then again, the '67's are small journal, no "pinks" until medium journal '68-9, right ?

Regards,
Steve

No, All 1967 SS350,s are Large journal with 11/32 bolt large journal rods, the 327 was a small journal engine, same as the 302 for that year. Early 68 Z28 used the non shotpeened rod pressed pin, later production 68 used the shotpeened rod with floating pin same as all 69 302DZ.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: connecting rod reconditioning on: February 28, 2014, 11:41:12 AM
Yeah, I looked it up in the P&A and the 67 350 DID use dimple rods! I didn't realize that. I thought they were like 68 and 69 which DIDN'T use dimple rods. I've deleted my original post.

Ed


Yes they sure puzzled me the first time I saw a set, VERY Rare. I personally would use the later 3/8" bolt "pink" rod to gain bolt strength and better rod material, especially if it is a original stamp block.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 18 queries.