CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 18, 2014, 12:43:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104499 Posts in 12235 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 64
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68' z28 Camaro emblem on trunk lid on: August 05, 2014, 06:05:30 AM
Can you post a picture of the inside of the lid? Is your car a NOR or LOS car and when was it built? Original paint?
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Caveat Emptor on: July 27, 2014, 10:28:27 AM
Thanks guys I am running for the hills I received a PM from another member and he said they are the same pictures when it was sold by someone else a year ago , Darrell

Darrell, to assist others I'd kindly suggest communicating ebay so they are aware as you could easily do this with the bid retraction. I have done so a couple times and the item was taken off. They do not want this anymore than we do.
Thanks William!
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wire stand on: July 26, 2014, 06:19:23 PM
Hey Chick....I noticed that location on Danny's pictures and immediately thought of you.....just forgot to tell you about it.

BTW....the link you posted is not the correct one, it should be the two prior pages that are displaying the alternator mounting problems.  Just a thought....did you measure to see if the alternator might be positioned too far forward.  I think that when I had headers on my car, the adapter positioned mine forward. 

Just a thought.

Post 800 & 806 on the page I linked both show the bracket don't they along with the alternator mounting questions don't they? I just checked and it did but maybe something else is wacky?HuhHuh Jerry, probably correct on the header thing and I do have the brackets located from the front but every time I see a picture I wonder about those brackets. Smiley
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wire stand on: July 26, 2014, 04:22:38 AM
Heres an early pic of an early Z

Note where the alternator brackets are attached.

Look at this page on my build thread and it shows mine along with a assembly picture of a 68Z motor coming off dress line (I assume).
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: My New '68 Camaro Z/28 Butternut Yellow on: July 21, 2014, 11:27:37 PM
Hi Danny and great find! What a girl friend! Just got back from vacation this morning and thanks for the email and kudos on my build thread, and yes, we now have Camaro relatives, huh! Great pictures and documentation so thank you! On the GT stamp, know I have not observed enough to have any idea if having the T only was common as many things could have been possible but we now know of one, yours. Hard to find examples like this with so much of the original content still there. I would tend to believe the PCV has been changed due to being a later design but maybe an expert will chime in. Again, great 68Z and congratulations.
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1111467 distributor on: July 07, 2014, 06:14:06 AM
What would is the best date code for a 1111467 distributor for a 302 z/28 assembled 3/29/68?
I'm not too sure there are many choices due to how many build distributor dates did they have prior to your engine build.  There was a 7J3 & 7J30 that JerrysM has  noted he's never seen in a car (potential service replacements per Jerry) and after that the first distributor 1111467 build I have noted is 8B8 with nothing until after your engine was built. To me the key is finding out what distributor batches (build dates) were manufactured prior to your 3/29 engine build which might be extremely low.
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 05, 2014, 06:15:32 PM
Well I guess Ed left on his own terms....
Who would have thought the post I started concerning senior members and us working together, would result in Ed calling it quits. The purpose of posting it was lets work together getting all the facts.
Whats funny is the last thing he typed was he "has a feeling" my rear end is a re-stamp.....and to go ahead and post pics of my casting numbers "if I really want the answer", then it got locked.

I could post a pic of the line worker hand stamping it, and the powers that be would say "re-stamp" because it doesn't fit the limited data that they have so far. My info went from anomalous, and not to be included, to ED identify it as a re-stamp, because he has a feeling. Does anyone else see a problem here?

Pictures can only be requested by the senior group, and when we post them  it is for research, when we ask, then they can't do it because it would be a "re-stamp gallery"
For some reason it seems like the information only flows one way on these posts asking for pictures....

Please DO NOT hijack this thread with more about your rear stamping! I for one was hoping Ed would reconsider as he's been a valuable member both here and on team Camaro.  I personally do not wish to see him go and urge all members to send Ed an email describing their desire and reasons for him to stay active. If we have indeed lost a member, we lost a valuable member and its unfortunate especially when we know some of the reasons.  
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoration help on: July 03, 2014, 08:46:46 PM
I know I sure liked looking at it George and you did GREAT as Tony the tiger says. Smiley There were a lot of changes to those deck lids as even the stamping changed location. And better yet, it was a real pleasure meeting you and having some conversation.
Love that color combo and Big Block!
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Green tip dipstick on: July 03, 2014, 05:21:06 AM
My 70Z LT-1 has the green tip dipstick.

Does it have the dimple in the neck of the finger grip and same stamp as my first post or something different altogether? I'm leaning towards mine being either a later stick or an over the counter. Might have to hit the  second gen NastyZ boys and ask what they have to know for sure.
Dimple in the neck = Later service replacement
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Bumper Finish on: June 27, 2014, 09:09:36 PM
Pour some evapo-rust in and let it soak and then preserve with some oil or just clean the rust scale off and paint on rust resolver which you can buy at Wall-mart, Lowe's, Home Depot, etc. 
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2014 camaro nationals on: June 27, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
It was a great turn out!!  With the weather iffy all the cars got in and out of the building without issue.  My second trip netted a score of 97.1 or 4855 points out of 5000.  A lot is owed to Bob Harris, Larry Christensen, Brad Mcadam and Jerry Macneish.  They all helped me over this past year to bring the car to this point.  I will post some pictures of the car at the show shortly.  I like the fact that they were very clear on how certain things should be on this car (1969 Z-28 LA car lemans blue)  It seems that all the discussion and research has clarified just how this car came from LA plant in April 1969

 Congrats on the score.    What did the judges decide on the trim rings?
Great score and congratulations! Smiley
As Mike asked, what did the judges decide on the trim rings?
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Do You Still Have Your First Car? on: June 27, 2014, 08:51:49 PM
Not my first car (62 Austin Healey 3000) but have back our first New Car, i.e. 69 L78 Nova
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Frederick Nationals ... on: June 27, 2014, 08:47:10 PM
While at the Nationals I met a guy from CRG and we talked about my car having the wrong year trunk lid. He mentioned he had several nice lids. I wrote his name after our conversation but can't find it now. If you read this can you contact me, I am very interested. I need a nice late 68 - early 69 lid. George

X2...let me know too.

I'm assuming it has to do with the stamping change in location and/or the design change due to Trans-am Firebird.
Was great meeting everyone at Frederick and again those that came up to Carlisle on Saturday.
And all the cars looked great so congratulations to everyone especially Larry's 1000 point kick off! Well done Larry!
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Another 99K 69 Z/28 on: June 21, 2014, 04:57:00 AM
I'd guess it was first bow-tie judged and then legend judged the three times (2003, 2004, & 2009). Seems someone is using one of the present price guides which shows #1 condition 69Z at 99K. A nice color for sure.
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it Worth..? on: June 18, 2014, 05:32:45 AM
Hi Randy! Realize this is a tough decision on your part so take your time with that. Without seeing the car its difficult but know the car has the original (no doubt) block and the early 266 distributor is a biggie. Nicely restored 68Z's bring 60 to 65K. Your car has many plusses (Canadian doc's, engine, dist. etc.) but also has to some buyers issues with the wrong paint. Stack the pro's and con's and see where you think that compares to say a $60,000 USA car. Last year according to Keith Martin's report 68Z's went down 6% and he has top values under 60K. Many of us as already mentioned can/would assist with posting pictures of the car.
Both Randy's car and our 68Z are siblings since both engines were born on the same day late in 1967.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 64
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.355 seconds with 18 queries.