CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 20, 2014, 11:34:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103280 Posts in 12153 Topics by 4689 Members
Latest Member: merle
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 300 301 [302] 303 304 ... 312
4516  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: "wanted Needle's in a hay stack " MY original 69 DZ 302 engine & part's on: March 12, 2007, 12:53:19 PM
4ZNOW -

The vin would be helpful since it is on the protect-o-plate.  There is also a partial vin stamped on the engine block and transmission case.  Posting your vin would increase your chances of finding your original parts, just watch out for fakes!   Smiley

Paul
4517  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: D80 speedo cable on: March 12, 2007, 12:46:34 PM
is this using the 3.73 gear?  i am thinking of leaving the dealer installed 4.88s in the diff.

Jason -

Keep it original, PLEASE!   Smiley

Paul
4518  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 302 DZ Heads on: March 12, 2007, 12:39:48 PM
Because there's VERY little metal left between the valve seats on 2.02" heads as it is, and it's very easy for a shop not intimately familiar with these castings to go through into the water jacket when cutting the recess for the seat, at which point the heads are scrap. The seats are NOT necessary unless you're towing a trailer at 100mph all day long or the engine's going in a boat.

Thanks John.  I've never heard that before!  My car has been stored for 26 years and I have not "fired her up" because everybody tells me to install hardened valve seats before I do.  So lets see... I need to change all the fluids and install a new battery...   Grin

Paul
4519  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 68 RS center grille on: March 10, 2007, 11:06:20 PM
You're right Steve.  I guess I should read the text too, instead of just looking at the pictures.   Embarrassed

Paul
4520  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 302 DZ Heads on: March 10, 2007, 11:01:17 PM
DO NOT INSTALL HARDERED SEATS!!!!!

Jerry

Why Jerry?   Huh

Paul
4521  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Pulley Part Number on: March 10, 2007, 10:42:52 PM
Hi Rich -

That's a water pump pulley for a 1969-70 Camaro, Chevelle, Nova, or Impala with a 396 cid engine (both 325 & 350 hp) and air conditioning.

Paul
4522  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Two Black 1969 Z28s! on: March 09, 2007, 06:45:49 PM
Jerry -

Is black a rare color for Camaros in general, or only for Z/28s?

Paul
4523  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Glove compartment light on: March 09, 2007, 04:30:41 PM
I just checked my '68Z with custom interior and it too only has the glove box light.  

Paul  
4524  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / LA built Z28's on: March 09, 2007, 02:24:28 PM
Southerner -

The console mounted gauge package (RPO U17) was an option.  It was not mandatory with the Z/28 package.  In 1969 you could order a tachometer without the console mounted gauge package.  However, when you ordered the console mounted gauge package you got a tachometer.  So in your case, someone added the console mounted gauges and/or removed the tach from the dash.   Huh  Adding the console mounted gauges is most likely what occured.

Paul  

4525  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Steering box color? on: March 09, 2007, 01:54:44 PM
68Zproject -

I believe the steering boxes were not painted when they left the factory, just natural metal.  On the survivor cars I've seen all the steering boxes have been covered in surface rust with no traces of paint.

Paul    
4526  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1111266 Distributor on ebay on: March 08, 2007, 12:49:11 PM
I figured it wasnt real as I know of only one good date for these. Thanks for confirming what I thought.
Auction says "GUARANTEED ORIGINAL STAMP". I guess somebody is going to pay over $1000 for a restamp. Shocked

Mike -

You have to be very careful how people word things, especially on Ebay.  If the seller stamped an unstamped distributor, then he could claim "guaranteed original stamp".  The true original ones I've seen usually say "guaranteed original factory stamping".  My advice is to do your homework and ask a lot of questions, as you have done by starting this thread.  Good luck finding one.  

Paul  
4527  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1111266 Distributor on ebay on: March 08, 2007, 12:31:10 PM
"HAS A FEW NICKS AROUND THE DATE"  In other words "The grinder got away from me"

Mike

Very funny Mike!!   Grin   Grin   Grin  
4528  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Jerry MacNeish's Minnesota visit on: March 08, 2007, 01:39:20 AM
I second that Ken!  From my very first post here ( http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=1539.0 ) to other CRG member's posts ( http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=1632.0 ) Jerry MacNeish (and others here at CRG) have help me to verify my Z/28 is not only the "real deal" but also extremely original.  So Jerry, I too thank you wholeheartedly!   Wink

Paul    
4529  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1111266 Distributor on ebay on: March 07, 2007, 11:15:37 PM
Very good Mark (Zedder)!  You have noted two of the four abnormalities I saw which make me think it's a restamp!   Cool

Paul
4530  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: NOS Body Parts on: March 07, 2007, 02:13:29 PM
Frank -

I'd go with a good, used original fender over NOS.  I've seen many flaws in NOS parts, specifically sheetmetal.

Paul
Pages: 1 ... 300 301 [302] 303 304 ... 312
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 18 queries.