CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 22, 2014, 09:23:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104690 Posts in 12247 Topics by 4719 Members
Latest Member: Baconcks
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Distributor Cam Piece on: June 04, 2012, 05:08:01 PM
I've also noticed ccw on the same part and have been told that means counter clock wise.Pontiacs have cw stamped on them and rotate opposite of Chevy's.Does anybody know anything more about theese stamp marks?
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 z28 m22 transmission survey on: March 18, 2012, 04:44:41 AM
Was the m-22 an option only for solid lifter motors? The reason that I ask is that there is  a 396/350 horse car here localy that the owner claims is a m-22 car and i think that i read in chevrolet by the numbers that it was  only for Z/28 and L78 cars.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 7 Blade Temp Control Fan on: March 28, 2011, 04:41:04 PM
My car is 12a and has the 779 blade on it,the car was built in LA
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AD Rims on: March 01, 2011, 08:42:35 PM
Don't forget that the YH wheels also show up on MonteCarlo's,I have a Sept. 69 SS454 that has a complete set of YH's on it.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 camaro LH door on: February 25, 2011, 05:40:16 PM
My 69 R/A IV Trans Am is an 08 E and has the vin sticker on the door.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: White paint on 68 cowl tag on: February 04, 2011, 01:57:37 AM
I looked at the rear end and found the following,casting# 3894860 NF,date I 15 7,stamping BS 09 18 G2 E.The tach is faded and it looks like there was a sticker on the top that has fallen off,the printed circuit has an ink stamp on it that does'nt look like a date to me.I don't see anything that makes me think that the tach has been changed,I wish the printed circuit had a date that could prove something to me,if someone else knows how to read it I'll post the info later for them.The gauge housing matches the rest of the interior for color and patina and the harness is a factory one not a conversion one.Is there anything else to look for?So back to the original question,does anyone know why the white paint was on the firewall ?
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: White paint on 68 cowl tag on: February 03, 2011, 09:27:30 PM
More info on the car,09C build date,PNT A2,Tr 719,BDY 68-12467NOR11365,VIN 124678N311787.The car is in bad but saveable condition,has P/S,P/T,P/W,gauges,tilt,correctly dated 4 bolt 323 block 069 intake,and high red line tach.Missing heads carb,pulleys,ect.I know that it looks like it could be an L 78 but who knows?It's been off the road and taken apart for 20+ years.I don't know what the white paint is about,I've heard about it on 67's before but have never been told why it was done,I have mainly owned 69's in the past so I know very little about 67 and 68 cars but would like to learn more about them.Thank you,Andy.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / White paint on 68 cowl tag on: February 03, 2011, 04:28:38 AM
Can anyone tell me why the cowl tag and surrounding firewall area on my 1968 is painted white? it looks like it was built like this,not painted later.It is a Sept.built black convertible SS if it matters.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Wire harness clip on: July 20, 2008, 04:43:09 AM
The same clip is used on 67 to 72 pickup's to hold the rear body harness to the frame under the box.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 69 decklid emblem holes on: April 20, 2008, 08:46:43 PM
Kurt,I know that the accepted stripe layout stops under the spoiler but this cars stripes go to the edge of the decklid.The car got hit very hard in the mid 70's and has been off the road since.The car still has it's original Lemans blue on it.The stripes are the narrow 68 style with a notch in the right stripe for the C in the Camaro emblem.All of the spoiler mounting holes look like they were done at the factory and the tension rods are the correct size,and they have blue overspray on them.If you look at the bottom side of the decklid you can see that the paint on the lower set of emblem holes is not scratched from the emblem nuts so I feel that this rules out a stripe delete car that may have had the stripes added at a later date.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 69 decklid emblem holes on: April 19, 2008, 11:45:57 PM
I have a 10 A 68 LA Z/28 that is a factory spoiler car and it has both sets of emblem holes,the stripes are the narrow 68 style and they go all the way to the edge of the decklid,witch is still original paint.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: first Los 69 Camaro?? Vin?? on: October 18, 2007, 06:38:25 PM
I have whats left of L503081,it is a 10A RS Z/28
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1" sway bars on 69 Z/28's on: June 01, 2007, 01:52:10 AM
All 1969 Trans Am's had 1'' bars.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 12A 69 Z28 on: April 02, 2007, 08:26:34 PM
I also have a 12 a 69 z/28 and would like to compare part dates but my car is from the LA plant.Andy.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Wheel well mouldings discontinued on: February 11, 2007, 02:25:00 PM
I saw an new repo set made by goodmark this weekend,they looked a lot better than the corvex junk.The rears even had the notches in them like OE,the vendor said he had test fit them and was very happy with them.Andy.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.