CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 06:48:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102525 Posts in 12094 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 209
3076  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct starter for '67 - 327 on: August 17, 2009, 11:02:54 PM
I have had three '67 327 2bbl cars and they all had 1107496 starters in them. If I remember correctly, the solenoids were 1114344.

-Jon
3077  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct 67 Control Arm Shaft on: August 09, 2009, 11:20:41 PM
Yes, one style on one side and another style for the other side is seen on many original LOS-built '67s. Keep an eye out for this when you have an opportunity to view other '67s. It sounds goofy but it is just another example of a production anomaly (of which there were many on first-gen Camaros). I don't think it matters which side has the straight one but I'm thinking I usually have seen them on the passenger side.

-Jon
3078  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct 67 Control Arm Shaft on: August 08, 2009, 12:46:22 AM
I'm not sure what you are meaning by NOS ones. Do you mean are they originals and not service parts? Most likely they are originals. As production moved closer to the end of the '67 model year, the dog bone style becomes more prevalent on LOS cars.

-Jon
3079  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct 67 Control Arm Shaft on: August 07, 2009, 10:02:03 AM
I have seen many LOS '67 Camaros with the straight control arm shaft. Quite often one straight and one dog bone on the other side. I'm sure this was just two different suppliers at the time. I have seen way too many examples going well back into the '70s and this is not just a service part situation. I should make clear this in regards to LOS-built '67 Camaros. For Norwood-built cars or other years, I have not followed the usage to the same degree.

-Jon
3080  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 Z-28 interior and intake questions on: January 08, 2009, 10:57:26 AM
Correct, it was not available until 1968.

-Jon
3081  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: RE: A.D. Anderson Chevrolet, Baltimore, MD on: December 30, 2008, 11:34:32 PM
That sounds like a neat project. I can't help with A.D. Anderson. Did he give you a list of other dealerships he is writing about? If we knew what they were, I (or others) may be able to help.

-Jon
3082  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: PTB on Los Angeles Camaros on: December 30, 2008, 12:42:13 AM
I don't recall where I heard it but I was told the stamps in orange were done on the day shift and the ones in green are the night shift. I've got no idea whether that is fact or fiction but is seems possible.

-Jon
3083  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 Z-28 interior and intake questions on: December 30, 2008, 12:32:23 AM
That is not true. Both Cougars and Mustangs ran in-line 2x4 intake manifolds in '67 because they filled out the proper forms with the SCCA to be able to use them. It also helped that Ford had the manifold already developed and available. Chevrolet did not have a proper 2x4 intake manifold available and thus did not have anything but the stock 1x4 manifold available to use. It was not until after the '67 racing season was over that Chevrolet was finishing up development of the 2x4 cross ram. That was done in time and the proper paperwork was filled out in time for it to be used for the '68 racing season which began at Daytona in early February.

-Jon
3084  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Data base for Camaro Race Car? on: November 24, 2008, 03:11:22 PM
Dan,

Thanks again for all the information. I appreciate it. Best of luck with the (racing) restoration of the car.

-Jon
3085  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Data base for Camaro Race Car? on: November 19, 2008, 12:30:14 AM
Thanks a lot for the information, Dan. Does the log book indicate the color of the car was still orange or was it something else by the time it raced? Also, can you let me know which track and what date its first race was.

Thanks again,
-Jon
3086  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Data base for Camaro Race Car? on: November 10, 2008, 06:06:31 PM
Gary,

I make note of the VIN and cowl tag (if they are still there) as well as the rollbar number. I generally try and take down as much information as I can get, and sometimes that is hard as some owners do not want to share much. I don't go out of my way to document the IMSA/GT cars as my primary interest is the "Historic" era (1966-1972) of Trans-Am and A/Sedan cars. Some of these T/A and A/Sedan cars did run some IMSA races as well though and that might be listed. Some of the original drivers have been interviewed to capture their stories before they are gone. Eventually I'd like to get them into a book. I tend to concentrate on the 1st-gen Camaro as that is where my main interest lies. I hope this answers your questions.

-Jon
3087  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Data base for Camaro Race Car? on: November 10, 2008, 12:50:12 AM
What's the number on the rollbar (or on the logbook) and who raced it back then? I keep a database on old A-Sedan and Trans-Am Camaros.

Thanks,
-Jon
3088  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Research help needed, 68 front drum style, finned vs unfinned on: May 24, 2008, 05:08:23 PM
Thanks for the responses. Still looking for brake drum data, especially for the '68 327 2-barrels and 6-cylinder cars.

Thanks,
-Jon
3089  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Research help needed, 68 front drum style, finned vs unfinned on: May 06, 2008, 02:16:22 PM
Thanks guys for the data so far. I'd appreciate hearing from others, especially '68 owners with 327 and 6 cylinder cars.

-Jon
3090  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Research help needed, 68 front drum style, finned vs unfinned on: April 30, 2008, 08:43:09 AM
I'm working on a CRG metallic brake report for the J56 and J65 brake packages used iin 1967. As many of you may know, those metallic brake packages were discontinued after the '67 model year. The finned brake drums used in '68 seem to be a lower cost alternative to the earlier packages and so I would like to understand which models received the finned front brake drums in 1968 and which models did not. So far, it looks like the SS models and L30/M20 models have the finned drums as standard equipment but I'm not sure about other models. I would appreciate any input on this so I can have a high degree of confidence in the accuracy of the report. My understanding is the rear drums were not finned for any model of Camaro in '68. If I'm wrong about that, please let me know.

Thanks,
-Jon
Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 209
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries.