CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 30, 2014, 06:01:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105853 Posts in 12353 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 84
61  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: custom striped Z I saw this weekend on: August 27, 2014, 01:03:31 PM
I love Black over Blue Guts...
Thats only the 2nd Black over Blue 69 Z28 I have seen, the other was a late oct or early nov 1969 built car with a 6500 redline tach and wrong engine. 

Great Car!
62  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: HELP!! I need info regarding original exhaust DB level!! on: July 29, 2014, 10:25:18 PM
Hey thanks Pacecar!

I know of gardner and tought about it... The thing is, id need to be able to prove it was available as an option on EVERY single Camaro in 69.

Aside from the chambered exhaust, what was the orig exhaust like on a 69? Something like my American Thunder (Flowmaster) system layout?

Thanks for the help!!

No single exhaust system was available on every single 1969 Camaro optional or otherwise.

RPO's L34,L78,L89 & Z28 produced before Dec 4th 1968 used a chambered type exhaust.

As of December 4th the Z28 went to a single crossflow muffler until May 2nd when resonators were added in front of the crossflow.

I would go buy an old original system that was worn out and put it on... If they want GM part numbers it would have them.
Call GM and tell them your Canadian overlords have dictated they sell you an original system, seems to be a catch 22, you have to have it but you can't buy it..
Seems to me that if it's not available it is difficult to require it's installation.
63  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: vin removal on: June 20, 2014, 12:16:32 PM
I too have wondered about the cleaning very well and applying silicone to  the tags and rivets front and back so there is no possibility of them contacting the solution.
IF I HAD TO REMOVE/REINSTALL A VIN for a Customer, they would be required to sign off on the fact that they requested the removal and metal replacement and that they understand the value could be reduced and it's authenticity may come into question. I would fully document every single thing I did on HD video, including the reason, showing other hidden VINS and showing the metal work required and then the REINSTALLATION, I would keep a copy of everything to cover my ass in case there were ever a question or he said she said episode.

If doing any blasting I use multiple layers of Gorilla Tape over tags.
64  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ stamp on: June 20, 2014, 11:28:30 AM
I have seen people try this method before and never once seen it work.
I suspect a lot has to do with the original impact of the characters and the depth of the milling.

Take this with a grain of salt as I haven't ever seen it done, however the engineer stated that "you couldn't grind enough metal away to get rid it without ruining the block".
65  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ stamp on: June 18, 2014, 09:59:19 PM
Blue is coolest I expect, if so then there is no deep radiating heat and the pad itself is not 100 deg, correct?
I think there are faints of some characters the way it was described to me was the engine needed to be brought up to temp then the pic every 10 or 15 min through cool down. The heat cycle will be completely different and hold longer vs heating the pad directly, maybe a rosebud on an oxyacetylene torch working in large circles under the pad.
If you had a industrial parts washer for cleaning engine parts it may work since the block is completely heated, hell leaving it outside one afternoon around here would get it 120.
66  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 RS SS L78 on: June 18, 2014, 09:38:26 PM
Sounds like Dave Miners old car but his had just under 10k and was not a RS.

I hope to see this one come out a garage... get it!
67  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 18, 2014, 10:42:09 AM
Those are GREAT pictures!
68  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ stamp on: June 18, 2014, 10:40:09 AM
The double tap on the Z also leads me to believe it is real.
I read a metallurgical engineer's statement recently that using a thermal imaging camera on a tripod, start the engine, allow to come to operating temp, then cut it off, take a pic of the pad every 15 minutes and the original stamp will appear. Said that you couldn't grind away enough of the pad to get rid of it and still have the block useable. I'd like to see if this works... anyone have a TI camera?
69  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Fake or real DZ stamp and partial Vin ? on: June 18, 2014, 10:34:16 AM
I have also heard that someone in OH has a REAL BROACH as big as a locomotive is how the guy I talked to put it.
He was asking me about having a block done, I told him there is no way they are going to be able to get the broach to make the same tooling marks as originals... machines scraping metal away wear and the wearing will happen consistently, the broach marks from one month to the next will progressively change, approximating the change will be NEAR impossible given the number of legitimate broach photos on file with people who check and certify high end cars.
Someday we are going to cut out all this nonsense... I read recently that the vette guys are at least 10 years ahead of any other marque on being able to identify fake tags and stampings.
70  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: OT - Talk about an insane price for a 'Cuda on: June 18, 2014, 10:20:51 AM
Kevin's car... he has an unbelievable collection of the best of the best muscle cars.
71  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 11, 2014, 08:56:26 AM
Was that the UOIT? or something else?
72  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 100K 69 Z/28 code 52 on: June 11, 2014, 08:55:39 AM
It is not consistent with other tags of the same week, I have a bunch of tags from the same timeframe as this one and they don't have the same characters style on several of the numbers.  So yes I would say it is a repro.  The body number is also probably the original number though.  No telling what the car was originally now, was it just a color change on a Z, or was it a base 307 coupe.

X2 I came to the exact same conclusion...bad characters but body num was prob original.
73  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 10, 2014, 03:13:31 PM
This may be another point if so admin please move to appropriate category.
Referencing Camaro Assembly Process auth -JohnZ
specifically Vin Assignment.

Once Chevrolet received the bodies from Fisher, (1 VIN)the Chevrolet scheduling rules and priorities took over, and that process was managed by the Body Bank operators, releasing units (or 2 VIN) into the Chevrolet assembly system based on proper labor line balance and option workload distribution.

John where exactly was the vin assigned?
1. immediately upon receipt numerically in order from Fisher or
2. after being scheduled and released into Chev Assem based on line balance etc?
3. other

74  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 100K 69 Z/28 code 52 on: June 09, 2014, 11:28:41 AM
Yes Mark something does look off there...

100k no smog or manifolds that'll run $2000 ouch! I saw the Tail light lenses (x77 didn't have vertical stainless trim), however the correct ones are not reproduced. Reproduction interiors just look too plastic to me.
Really a very nicely done car if the numbers checked out as legit...

I've not too big on red cars since I was a teenager but I do like Garnet red when it looks like that one!

75  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 09, 2014, 09:17:47 AM
It's really not a semi gloss, Here is an untouched unexposed place on a 69 SS showing there is a reflection and a good bit of gloss.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 84
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.