CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 29, 2014, 09:11:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103664 Posts in 12182 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 80
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Is this paint color combo possible ? on: June 06, 2014, 05:32:28 PM
My girlfriend pointed out that she asked 3 questions... She was wondering...
Confirmed with an English expert. That was not phrased as a question and is not a question. It is a 'musing'. Could be amusing too. 


LOL I am going to use that next time she and I have a disagreement...
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 06, 2014, 05:29:52 PM
No - on the trim tag of my Norwood built Z. (GG) Original owner verified  he ordered the car stripe delete , spoke with the man about 20 years ago who shot the stripes in 69-70. The 2nd owner had it done when he ordered the cowl hood through Milad Chevrolet.

Ok I hadn't realized your car was stripe delete, that throws a monkey wrench in assumptions.
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Is this paint color combo possible ? on: June 05, 2014, 03:58:43 PM
My girlfriend pointed out that she asked 3 questions... She was wondering...
 
Kurt answered the factual parts, left the wondering up to the owner.

BTW A good friend had a 67 BB conv Bolero Red white top bumblebee and pins with the black tail pan, it looked great!

IMHO dual exh out the back chrome tips etc are what ruin the lines of the 67-68's, it ruins the stock appearance and the way the quarters taper to the tail. .
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Crayon behind rear seat X? Opinions please on: June 05, 2014, 02:52:38 PM
There are numerous 4 leafed original SS's.
I take it the rear tail pan was originally black?
IF it wasn't I could see the number being read as a 3, the 2 indicated BB with style trim, so black tail pan and black rockers, although 51 wasn't supposed to have the rockers blacked out, many Dusk blue cars did.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 05, 2014, 02:46:39 PM
Correct me if I am wrong but it appears Mark is stating that that information applied to TT would be furnished differently based on the plant...

Example... LA produced cars with no stripe would have a - - since they did in fact paint the front ends, BUT Norwood would have standard information? 

It makes more sense that all information would be sent to the initial point of assembly, it seems it would be easier to assign all information the same regardless of whether it applied or not, it would eliminate the possibility of not enough information at the assembly plants.
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heavy undercoating was it factory or dealer applied? on: June 05, 2014, 01:59:38 PM
The factory used something with a fairly large nozzle as what was applied was quite viscous allowing a heavy build without too much sagging.
The inside of the quarters in the trunk have approx 3/16-1/4" build which can not be achieved using a spray can or even a schultz gun.

I bought a textured ceiling gun, with 3 different sized nozzles, to try to get a suitable build, haven't tried it yet, may be nothing but a mess.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Front Spoiler to Lower Valance Bolts on: June 05, 2014, 01:18:51 PM
I've got 5-5 gallon buckets full of original nuts bolts and clips etc at my dads house.... I know what I'm gonna be doing!
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early 1968 Z/28 original tires? on: June 03, 2014, 10:31:24 AM
It was an E70x15 according to the air pressure sticker, being available only on the Z28 I would call it special.

By the way the early 69 Z's list the on their Window Sticker a no cost 15" tire option.
PU6 AD - E70 x 15 Tiires
This was dropped sometime between N522xxx and N528xxx based on the Window Stickers in JM's book.
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Wanting to buy new leaf springs. on: June 03, 2014, 09:43:12 AM
IF yours are not pitted or broken then you can have them re-arched for $100-150.
A customer of mine has had 2 sets re-arched one for a Z and one for a L65 4 spd conv both sets sit perfectly.

Here is a side by side of comparison of original Z28 springs vs Bob Harris's (Camaro Specialties) springs, they are extremely close,
The leaf ends are not quite as thin on the ends, the rectangle pockets are not quite as deep and the spring clamps are not the same gauge (thinner) - these are worlds above anything else available the other reproductions are not ANYWHERE CLOSE!










40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early 1968 Z/28 original tires? on: June 03, 2014, 01:29:44 AM
What was the P28 option, priced at $90 for 1968 models,... "Wheels, 15" and special tire (added 03JAN68 to AIM)"

There is a guy on the Yenko site with a 68 L78 4.56 or 4.88 car that has the original window sticker and 15" tire option, pretty sure it has DF's & wide tread GT's, someone else remembers a car (was def not a Z as it either had air or was a real auto car) with the 15" tire pressure sticker but had discounted it as being wrong earlier in their life.    
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: BB Intake manifold studs on: June 02, 2014, 09:53:57 PM
Is your ac brace through bolted, meaning the bolts that go through the braces also retain the intake?
Or are there studs and the ac bracket is on the studs?
That may be the answer I need, as BB camaro engines were not coded differently if they were to be in a car equipped with A/C.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: BB Intake manifold studs on: June 02, 2014, 07:48:03 PM
What about quadrajet automatic cars? L35?
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / BB Intake manifold studs on: June 02, 2014, 02:16:54 PM
The AIM shows that the automatic equipped L78's had two studs on the drivers side of the engine (part of assembly) for mounting the idle stop solenoid, were these (studs) on all auto BB or only holley equipped auto BB's?     
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Front Spoiler to Lower Valance Bolts on: June 01, 2014, 11:02:05 PM
Have we been giving lengths as overall?
I sold MRO supplies for Bowman fastener company and we always gave measurements from the seat (bottom face) of the bolt.
I would say that is 1/2" long.
45  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 12:00:40 PM
A 4.10 M20 combo even show room stock would have been quite a bit quicker...
Heads up race from a dead stop with two good drivers you would think the 3.73 M21 was missing a plug wire.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 80
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.345 seconds with 18 queries.