CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 12:35:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105577 Posts in 12329 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23]
331  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 Camaro ignition and trunk keys on: April 29, 2006, 09:38:27 PM
yeah, see here for the key run-down  http://www.camaros.org/keysandlocks.shtml

oh lol!! hey Lakeholme, I was just about to quote you and reply to  something u said about the B & S early keys listed in Classic's catalog and you edited it out of your post  Smiley
I couldn't see the caviate that you quoted
332  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 68 396 radiator cap on: April 29, 2006, 11:37:35 AM
Hi, was the original radiator cap for 68 396 350hp the short eared or long eared type?
Were they 15 psi?
Any pics appreciated
333  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 Camaro ignition and trunk keys on: April 29, 2006, 08:24:31 AM
Ah ok, so mine was built 3rd week of December 1967, and would definitely have come with hex keys.

Yup, I see a lot of stuff on ebay being listed as NOS when it's clearly not, and they're not just using NOS as a keyword either.
334  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 Camaro ignition and trunk keys on: April 28, 2006, 05:02:47 PM
True, but they must be punched out under licence from Briggs and Stratton [and GM], if not by B & R themselves?
If they are punched by B & R then that would quaify them as new genuine re-issues?
335  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Folding rear seat option on: April 28, 2006, 02:52:36 PM
Ah, I understand the legend now, pretty obvious really  Roll Eyes
Ok, so the multileaf rear springs in G31 are the same as in F41? with G31 being a way to order multileaf rears for vehicles other than SS etc?

I really should start a new thread for this spring discussion  Smiley
336  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Folding rear seat option on: April 28, 2006, 12:00:37 PM
wow,a few but not that many. I have U46 and A31 also, very few of those options.
A question, F40 and F41 requires 12300 and 12400. I can't see a reference to what 12300 and 12400 are?
337  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 Camaro ignition and trunk keys on: April 28, 2006, 09:38:02 AM
Hey thanks for he info.
Quote
I bought a couple sets from Classic Industries last fall.  They had "Briggs and Stratton" on them.
interesting, were they quoted as NOS or exact repro's?
338  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Does anything seem wrong with this auction? on: April 28, 2006, 09:30:55 AM
Quote
It looks like some guy tried to sell a car using his wife's access to Ebay.
Other way round I'd say, his account - her auction on the previous sale.

Looks ok to me, lotta work to be done though! I tweaked the levels of some of the pics in photochop, from what I could see the interior sheet metal looked fine.

Quote
Finally, if you look at the seller's history, you will see he has sold the same exact subframe setup three times.  Three different auctions all with the exact same pic and different high bidders.  My concern is maybe the guy is collecting money only.
Found one of those through googles cache, reserve wasn't met which may be the case with the others.
339  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Folding rear seat option on: April 28, 2006, 08:36:04 AM
Anyone know of build numbers/rarity of option A67 - folding rear seat for 68 models
340  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Mystery '67 Camaro Update! on: April 28, 2006, 08:02:50 AM
I'm stunned that you were given previous owners details over the phone!!!   Shocked
Yeah keep it simple, pleasant and with the least fuss possible for them.
341  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 Camaro big block or not? on: April 28, 2006, 07:44:16 AM
What transmission and rear axle does it have?
Other distinguishing features of big block were the hi rise hood with stack style ornaments and satin blacked out rear tailight panel [some exceptions i.e black body paint]
342  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 68 Camaro ignition and trunk keys on: April 28, 2006, 07:39:19 AM
Hi all, Did 68 Camaro's only come with hex head style C/D keys, or is it possible that very late 68's came with the newer rectangular and oval head C/D keys?
My date code is 12 C 68 [3rd week December 1968?]

I have noticed elsewhere blank keys being listed as NOS, yet don't have either 'Briggs and Stratton' or 'Rochester Products Division' stamped into the head. I would have expected original factory blanks to still quote the manufacturer   Huh

Comments appreciated

btw, exactly when did production stop for the 68 Camaro, give or take a week?
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 18 queries.