CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 03:20:53 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97237 Posts in 11693 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 350 motor numbers on: October 26, 2006, 10:08:52 AM
I just meant that some people will install "period correct" motors. At least he has the partial VIN to check against the full VIN on the car.   Smiley
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '69 Z/28 Stripe Widths? on: October 26, 2006, 10:02:21 AM
AIM = Assembly Instruction Manual
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 350 motor numbers on: October 25, 2006, 09:45:42 PM
But not likely to be original to the car. Engine assembled Late Jan., but car built mid-April   Sad
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 307/327/350 on: October 20, 2006, 02:11:20 PM
Either a 327 or a LM1 350.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 Window Glass on: October 15, 2006, 09:10:27 PM
Mark, CRG has agreat article on glass here  Near the end it says this about Astro glass    "The Astro-Ventilation logo was dropped from the 1968 door glass after Nov '67 (approximately) production. However, one pane of apparently original May '68 door glass with the Astro-Ventilation logo has been observed in a 05C build. The mating glass on the opposite side of the vehicle is Sep '67 Astro-Ventilation glass, and combined with the other dates seen in the set, CRG believes that the May '68 pane had the Astro-Ventilation logo added by LOF to create a matching set, presumably to fill a void in production and/or to use up left-over panes. Of course this conclusion is speculative, but we will continue to watch for other, similar, indications." Hope this helps

36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New Guy... Just adopted a 37 year old on: October 09, 2006, 05:40:21 PM
3-Speed was the base transmission, even for an SS350   Smiley
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Fuel Lead Additive on: October 09, 2006, 10:51:47 AM
So, yes, if you're not going to drive it much, you should be ok.  If it's a daily driver, you should get the hardened valve seats installed. When I rebuilt the motor on my F100 I figured it didn't need hardened seats. About 9 months later one of the valves had sunk.   Sad  Or you could check with a machine shop, see if it cost more to do the work after the damage is done. If the cost is the same, wait and see if it becomes an issue.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Aftermarket wheels for my '68 RS/SS w 4 piston calipers? on: October 08, 2006, 05:59:08 PM saw this tool on V8TV it's called wheelrite. It's for measuring your car to see what rim/tire combo will work and clear all your goodies.
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 RS/SS Muncie 4 Speed and 350 Block needed/questions on: October 05, 2006, 07:15:56 PM
So how accurate is CBTN? Mr Colvin lists 52 different axle codes for 1967 Camaro PA-PZ and QA-QZ.  Or maybe many of these codes are 10-bolt only codes? And 6 months before the build date of the car, while not unheard of, does seem unlikely, doesn't it?
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Motor casting numbers Is it a 350/302??? on: October 05, 2006, 06:56:15 PM
Ok the heads are from a 1971 model vehicle, the block is from 1970 or later, but the CNR or CNB doesn't seem to correspond to a Camaro motor, according to the info at If you don't get more info here, you may try over at, they work with all years of Camaros, while this is a first generation only site.  Smiley
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: DZ block stamping on: October 04, 2006, 07:39:11 PM
What exactly is your question Huh Are you asking for restamp opinions?  Is the partial VIN by the oil filter? Does this date agree with the casting date and partial VIN? Is this actually a 302?
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Los Angeles Production Numbers on: October 03, 2006, 05:40:19 PM
Here's an article on that subject.  (31163 Van Nuys Camaros in 69)
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Anyone with 68 fan pics? on: October 02, 2006, 10:08:13 AM
Here's a good article on this subject, Mark.
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Vintage 67 Camaro pics on: September 24, 2006, 08:33:30 PM
Looks like pic #2 has a flat non-SS hood. And what is that on the sideview mirror? Looks like Pippi Longstocking or something.  Grin
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Finally Home on: September 24, 2006, 12:33:37 AM
That looks great!!  Cool
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 18 queries.