CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2015, 10:16:00 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112100 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 AIM 6 B2 on: June 15, 2010, 06:02:41 AM
Wish I had a copy of that page.  Mine is blank also.
32  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 1967 documentation list - updated 5/7/2007 on: June 15, 2010, 04:29:55 AM
I have an original 67 Camaro complete with all documentation.  It's VIN number is 7N250143
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 speed warning help needed on: July 26, 2006, 05:02:59 AM
According to the factory assembly manual (UPC U15), your wire should plug into the fuse panel labeled BAT. FUSED.  The bracket is available through D&R Classic Automotive.  Haven't found a source yet for the buzzer.
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 L6 AC Oil Filler Cap (Twist On) on: July 01, 2006, 09:18:50 AM
Does anyone know what the color was for these caps?  I've seen some that appear to be a flat black, some semi-gloss, and some that appear to be aluminium (unpainted and unchromed).  Which is correct?
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 Optikleen vs Kleerview washer bottles on: July 01, 2006, 06:32:28 AM
Which Camaro models in 67 received the older OptiKleen bottles and which ones received the Kleerview?  I know that the OptiKleen bottles were triangular.  What did the Kleerview bottles look like?  Were they also a triangular bottle?
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Broadcast Sheet Decoding on: June 27, 2006, 01:53:59 AM
Found it several years ago behind the back seat when I removed it to have some upholstery work done.  They're scarce but I guess I was just one of the lucky ones.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Broadcast Sheet Decoding on: June 24, 2006, 12:56:04 PM
Is there anything anywhere that you know of that would break down a broadcast sheet?
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Broadcast Sheet Decoding on: June 24, 2006, 05:36:53 AM
I have one of the original body broadcast copies for my 67 L6 that is in immaculate condition.  However, I don't see a lot of corrilation between the coding on the broadcast copy and RPO codes.  While I can figure out most of the coding based on what I have that I know is original, should these codes mean something to me or only to the factory?  Is there a code somewhere separate from the RPO codes that I should be looking at? 
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 L6 Fuel Filter Location on: June 22, 2006, 03:54:06 PM
Can someone give me advise on the proper location of the fuel filter on the 67 L6 250 engine?  I've seen two different versions.  One is in the line from the fuel pump to the carburator inlet and the other is between the tank and the fuel pump.  The assembly manual and all of my other documentation isn't too clear on this and there's not many L6 engines to compare it to.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Original Tire Manufacturer on: June 12, 2006, 06:52:22 AM
Does anyone know who manufactured the original tires for the standard 67 coupe?  I know that Firestone made the Wide Ovals but I'm not sure who produced the original 7.35 x 14 2 ply whitewalls.  Was it Firestone also?
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: The "perfect" orange on: June 12, 2006, 06:20:24 AM
Is there a difference between the 67 and 69 engine colors?
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Owners Manual & Bag on: June 12, 2006, 06:00:19 AM
My original bag shows a date of 3-16-66.  The manual, which is also original shows First Edition, July, 1966.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Steering Wheel on: March 25, 2006, 06:00:05 AM
According to the 67-69 RPO it was the same on the Z23 and Z87 package in 68.
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 250 Fender Emblems on: March 23, 2006, 10:18:38 PM
Thanks Philip.  I'll give them a try.  I contacted Trim Parts, Inc. who manufactures most of the emblems for Ricks and Year One.  Their response was that there just wasn't any demand for them.  Real shame 'cause I know that I can't be the only person with a 250 L6 out there.  I'm beginning to believe that if I ever do find them, I'll pay as much for them as what the car is worth!

On another note, I'm surprised that there aren't more individuals who want and desire to keep their Camaros original.  To me, that's the beauty of having a car like this.  Yea, I could drop a 350cu in it but then it becomes just another suped up car; not the 67 that rolled off the showroom floor.  It's a challenge to keep it as original as I can.  Especially with parts being discontinued.  And I'm sure it will only get worse the longer I have this car.  Guess I've been religated to the junk yard/swap meet crowd.  ARGH!
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Engine Decals on: March 21, 2006, 04:16:19 PM
Are there template sets for engine decals?  There are many different decals available through numerous sources but how can you tell what is suppose to be on your vehicle?  Seems to me that if you're restoring a vehicle to it's original condition that it's incomplete without the correct decals and placement.  I know it's going to be dependent upon what engine/options you have installed i.e., AC vs no AC, etc.  What I'm particularly interested in is something to tell me what I should have with my 250 L6 engine.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.295 seconds with 18 queries.