CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 10:10:12 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105663 Posts in 12339 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 217
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Original Horns #289 & 290 with odd dates or not ? on: September 18, 2014, 10:46:07 AM
New setup guy on the date stamper. It happens....
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: FOUND: The Actual 1969 Camaro RS/SS Conv. NASCAR Pace Car for Bristol in 1969! on: September 18, 2014, 10:43:28 AM
No pics.
Unknown what tracks.
The 6th car is a wildcard - fits the pattern, but was built later in the year. A replacement or incremental car?
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: FOUND: The Actual 1969 Camaro RS/SS Conv. NASCAR Pace Car for Bristol in 1969! on: September 18, 2014, 01:08:44 AM
Dan Kirchner is the guy who found all those pacer pics and he still has the originals and can provide a high quality print. That # is still correct and his email is dansautolit@aol.com.

There were at least 10 cars and I know of 5 (and another possible car). The 5th car is very original and a manual, unlike the others.
Ruben never said if his was an auto or manual.
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 15, 2014, 08:01:45 PM
I don't think so. There weren't any strikes then and the monthly totals are consistent.
50  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 14, 2014, 10:43:18 PM
I'm little confused by the data, mostly the date from the NCRS.
Yes, the month looks a little wonky. April ran long and 05C seems to be earlier in the month.
Fisher dates were for them and someday-weeks they cared more than others....
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 14, 2014, 10:14:41 AM
There is a problem with may & june production number # because may numbers show twice as many build as any other month on Norwood cars. Have a 06a car with that starts with 449---. Have a one owner 06b car that starts with 453---.
Well, there's asterisks next to the data and this statement is in bold on the page: "The data for some months (especially May and June 68 at Norwood) deviate significantly from actual build dates,....."
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 11, 2014, 10:33:49 PM
That doesn't looks right. Maybe 5/16?
A car right after yours has a 0509 axle.
What's your axle date?
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 X77 garage/barn find on: September 11, 2014, 10:22:49 PM
Regulator very probably will work fine. They last.
54  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Deltronic Transistor-Controlled Magnetic Pulse amp. plate 3916730 on: September 11, 2014, 10:13:31 PM
You looked here? http://www.camaros.org/trans_ign.shtml
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: delco-remy starters on: September 11, 2014, 10:12:06 PM
That's a 68 MY-built starter so it's not original to your car.
1108361 - don't know of any Camaro usage til 69.
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 10:25:30 PM
I know of a couple of cars that were attempted to order with the MA6. Orders were held up and finally built without.
Corvettes did get it.
57  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 10:39:53 PM
Production totals for the blocks are zero. Car totals are zero too.
Was the JU block in a car or a service block?

I recall seeing one MA6 block that was apparently built and then reworked by the engine plant and sold as a service block.
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: First Camaro delivered to Yenko going to auction on: September 09, 2014, 01:31:45 PM
He is referring to the 68 in the link he posted.
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 09:52:38 AM
From http://www.camaros.org/drivetrain.shtml#PadStamps

Engine Codes Reserved for Use With MA6 Heavy-Duty Clutch
 (none known to have been produced):
 L48 - HP,  L35 - JU,  L34 - KA,  L78 - KC,  L89 - KE
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: X55 and M35? on: September 08, 2014, 06:44:36 PM
http://www.camaros.org/trans.shtml#Powerglide
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 217
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.