CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2015, 06:01:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112104 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 233
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Earliest 3969341 and Latest 3894860 axles on: March 01, 2015, 01:06:41 PM
I added the cast date to the 0806 axle and added an 0818 axle too.
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: master cylinder casting number on: February 27, 2015, 12:45:19 AM
That's a GM pic/drawing. Complain to them. Smiley
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What starting letter should my Plates have? on: February 27, 2015, 12:38:57 AM
How can they be registered to him if he's dead?
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 L30 / M35 Starter 1108361 or 1108367 ? on: February 25, 2015, 03:33:11 PM
All 68 327's got the 1108367.
I'm working on correcting the L30/M20 article.
50  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 123479N527963 Protecto plate on ebay on: February 25, 2015, 02:45:44 PM
VIN is actually 124379N527963.
LM1 car.
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What starting letter should my Plates have? on: February 25, 2015, 01:55:15 PM
Without proof otherwise, I think those plates may be original.  I know of earlier 68's with Y & Z plates. Depended on the sales in the area.
I don't think they issued new plates on a resale.
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Earliest 3969341 and Latest 3894860 axles on: February 24, 2015, 08:06:16 PM
Here's an early 341.
08C CBL0806G1  I don't know the casting date.
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Another 1969 Z28?? on: February 23, 2015, 01:22:38 AM
Yes. LOS stamps moved throughout the year.
54  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early 69 Z28, Is it real? on: February 23, 2015, 01:21:23 AM
Car was for sale awhile back. Looks like the axle is BV, not BU.
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67-9 Fuel lines on: February 22, 2015, 10:21:45 PM
Wanting to get more information on the 69 year to help when I am looking for parts. I always understood that ALL 69 V8's had 3/8 line from the tank to pump. I am wanting to clarify this. Would this have been the same part # regardless of engine? I ask as I have seen some fuel lines advertised (OEM used) as coming off a COPO. If this is the same line as , say, a 307, as I believe, I am not going to payi for the COPO lineage Wink makes sense? I mean, you say COPO and the price goes up 100X's, absurd. I also am curious if the Q-jet main line, too, is the same as the single line (as far as bends & overall shape) seems as it would be. As a side, the repros all show the same part # for all the V8 different applications, but who can believe what is printed in those catalogs? Thanks, CRG. Does not make sense that a different part number would be used for a 307,302,396..., but engine mounts are different, so who knows?
Did you look in the parts catalogs?
http://gmpartswiki.com/browse
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 124378L335653 on: February 22, 2015, 10:17:44 PM
Thanks!
57  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67AM/FM question on: February 22, 2015, 10:11:45 PM
I don't think Multiplex came out until 1968, btw.
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early 69 Z28, Is it real? on: February 22, 2015, 07:48:45 PM
The stamp was setup at the start of the day, not the shift.
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Another 1969 Z28?? on: February 22, 2015, 07:11:50 PM
I think the pad is original.
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early 69 Z28, Is it real? on: February 22, 2015, 07:00:43 PM
In my opinion, it's a restamp. I see several things wrong with it and I won't say if I don't feel confident.
If I didn't have stampings to compare it to, I'd have thought it was an original - it looks good.

Trans was listed as P9T17A, axle BU1220G.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 233
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 18 queries.