CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 31, 2015, 05:12:54 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109332 Posts in 12659 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 228
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: More 69 Z/28 Ebay fraud on: January 07, 2015, 04:43:52 PM
The same thread is running on TC, so the VIN is out there with this info. But I'll pare this thread.

I'd like to rachet down the ebay policing a notch. Just notifying (with tact and discretion) the seller that the tag has issues is sufficient.
I listed something on ebay the other day and someone contacted me that it was incorrect. I researched and many were listed incorrectly, hence my error. Deleted and relisted correctly. My point is notification is all that needs to happen. It's up to the seller to do more research.

I should add that cars like this aren't always added to the db. Very little data of research value and every entry takes more time than you'd think (noting source, comments, pics, etc).

I do save the pics. I will mention the file format I use since it may help others when looking for a pic.
We use the VIN in the title, e.g. tag_9N673525_NOR108403_repro.jpg  and vin_9N673525.jpg.
If you search for the VIN on your computer, then you can find the pic. Wink

That's why regular members post these Trim Tags and VIN's, isn't it? To help out fellow enthusiast's?
And that's why I highly suggest adding the VIN to any thread about a car. Often VIN pics or tag pics are added, but the VIN itself needs to be there too.
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: More 69 Z/28 Ebay fraud on: January 07, 2015, 03:24:58 AM
Tag is an obvious repro.
That's not speculation. But I'm torn on how much info in the thread should be on public display.

Rich,
I see your point. But none of the post malign ebay and that's not how I read it the first time.
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Willow Run plant about to see the wrecking ball...? on: January 02, 2015, 06:08:38 PM
I had a Phoenix ($450!) and a Citation.  Great cars, IMO. And living in the north, FWD was a big benefit as was the room in a 4-door hatch. 
I always wanted one of the X11 or Phoenix SX versions - they were fast in their day.
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Trim tag and engine stamp opinion on: January 02, 2015, 12:39:31 AM
Why there's a T? Because someone screwed up when they restamped it.
50  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Willow Run plant about to see the wrecking ball...? on: January 01, 2015, 11:47:06 PM
I know they were built in WR. I don't know if Tarrytown also built X-bodies.
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / New article - Water pumps on: January 01, 2015, 04:16:35 PM
Bryon put together a nice article on 1st gen waterpumps. Lots of pics to show the variants.
http://www.camaros.org/waterpumps.shtml
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Willow Run plant about to see the wrecking ball...? on: January 01, 2015, 04:12:53 PM
btw, the Yankee Air Musuem at Willow Run was able to buy the final assembly part of the Willow Run plant.
Pretty cool opportunity.
http://www.mlive.com/business/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2014/11/nonprofit_award_yankee_air_mus.html
53  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: New member with New 68 Camaro Convertible 6-Cylinder on: December 31, 2014, 11:39:12 AM
I liked it with the redlines. YMMV. Smiley
54  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hello on: December 31, 2014, 11:33:33 AM
Just retract your bid, if there's still time.
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Motor vin stamp vs. transmission vin stamp on: December 30, 2014, 08:50:21 PM
I've seen a few examples in 69 where they didn't match.
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 0-0 paint code on: December 30, 2014, 08:46:13 PM
Because it's in the accessory code area.

Gary,
There's a dash under the 760-Z if you look closely.
57  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vin info on: December 29, 2014, 02:13:48 AM
124379N608302
The VIN wasn't, but the car is. I entered it without the complete VIN, hence Bill couldn't find it.
Here's when I first saw it: http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/59788/1969-number-matching-z-28-need#Post59788
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 68 camaro 7 blade fan 3931002 on: December 29, 2014, 01:47:58 AM
What's the build date and engine date? Is there a date on the fan?
Strange fan in that it doesn't seem to appear in any literature or on many cars.
59  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N677996 - Protect-O-Plate on: December 28, 2014, 12:32:24 AM
Here's a pic of it.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/361126860452
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Craigslist finds part II on: December 28, 2014, 12:15:26 AM
To me, the value just crashed. Not original carb, alt, valve covers, etc...
Got a pic of the front pad?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 228
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.