CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 15, 2014, 04:37:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104394 Posts in 12228 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 214
3136  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early vin # on: January 02, 2006, 01:30:42 AM
Wayne,
I realize you're new to posting on this forum, but this type of post is not acceptable or called for.
Specifically the political comments and the negativity.

Thanks!

3137  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New CAMARO site opening *not spam* on: January 01, 2006, 02:24:39 AM
That site looks like a shameless knockoff of the Team Camaro forums.
Almost exactly the same names for the forums, including the descriptions. Unless permission has been granted by the camaros.net people, could be some copyright issues involve. It does not look like it's adding to the Camaro world, IMO.
3138  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: December 31, 2005, 05:14:09 PM
To clarify, the db has been laboriously created over the years from various sources. These include observed cars (car shows, ebay, etc), posted or submitted data, and documentation. Most of the data consists of the #'s off of the cars; as you'd expect, most cars don't have documentation.

Even at over 10,000 cars in the db, we still have only 1.5% of the first gen Camaros.
3139  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 12 bolt restoration on: December 28, 2005, 11:07:19 PM
That was the one detail that I noticed too. The rest I agree with. Wink
3140  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: drive train on: December 28, 2005, 11:05:39 PM
Thanks!
I still don't understand the 10 bolt in it. Unusual since all other L48/M38 cars have a 12 bolt.
Or it got swapped and the date happened to be perfect for the car, which I kinda doubt.
3141  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear axel posi designation on: December 28, 2005, 11:02:39 PM
QW is a posi code though. So it would appear that they missed stamping it.
3142  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: December 21, 2005, 04:15:34 PM
GIBSTER,
Can you post pics of the VIN's in those locations?
3143  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: December 20, 2005, 12:52:26 AM
No, 70 VIN's away is the closest.  Tongue
3144  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 L78 camaro convertable on: December 19, 2005, 01:09:12 AM
11??
I personally know of more cars that that!
200-400 is a reasonable guess. Out of 4889 L78's in 69.
3145  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: seat belt color on: December 16, 2005, 04:54:28 PM
That's a related issue.
As John states, belt type was not related to interior type.
Pat's question is about color. And deluxe belts often became colored, whereas standards were black. Not true for all interior colors, but true for red and 69 greens.

That color chart is in my seatbelt article, which has progressed. Now I need to HTML it.....
3146  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: seat belt color on: December 16, 2005, 01:19:20 AM
Nope. They are correct.
For whatever reason, the standards were black in a red interior, but deluxe belts would be red. Go figure.....

What are the dates on the belts and how many belts are in the rear? Wink
3147  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Early vin # on: December 16, 2005, 01:10:03 AM
Mike,
That isn't how it's supposed to be. How many years has GM been building cars???
Buy the first Honda off the line, it won't have issues. Quality is often higher then the prior model. Not saying which is the better car, but who has their act together.
3148  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: REAR END DATE on: December 16, 2005, 12:59:41 AM
I'm not following your reasoning Wayne.
Real paperwork is the best documentation. Just gotta be able to ID the real stuff.
3149  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: VINYL TOP MOLDINGS?? on: December 12, 2005, 01:01:25 AM
I believe I (or William) posted that.
The trim has different part #'s. That's the only known difference.
Only black in the recess.
3150  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN number matching trim tag on: December 08, 2005, 03:52:45 PM
Seems like I recal a previous post on the old forum which discussed this in some detail. I I recall, the post stated that if a logistical or actual production problem occurred with the body after Fisher began building it, depending on how sever the issue was, the body would remain on the Fisher side of the fence until the problem was fixed - resulting in a more than standard variance between body build and final assembly build dates.
That very rarely happened. Only if there was an issue that had to be reworked and most were fixed on the same shift.
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 214
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.335 seconds with 18 queries.