CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 01:24:18 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105611 Posts in 12333 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 217
3136  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Question of build date vs. rear assembly date on: March 01, 2006, 11:46:41 AM
Steve,
What year and which plant?
3137  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: EARLY 69 CAMARO on: February 23, 2006, 01:28:55 AM
Rob,
By me or Daniel.... Smiley
3138  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: NON POSI CAR on: February 23, 2006, 01:11:26 AM
Any ratio was available, 3.73 was the lowest gear you could get without a posi. 4.10 + all had posi's.
3139  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: February 23, 2006, 12:46:34 AM
Can you post or email the trim tag data and engine code?

As I look through the data, I do see some other real early NOR cars with the VIN by the oil filter.
3140  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: z11 pace car on: February 20, 2006, 12:59:35 AM
I believe that is the original axle for that car.
3141  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: help decode on: February 20, 2006, 12:57:44 AM
Car is real, well what's left of the car.
Engine, axle, and cowl are original. Trans and rear clip were replaced.
Car was in NE, PA, and OK.
3142  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 X77 code Camaro Many fact questions. on: February 20, 2006, 12:53:10 AM
In 69 Camaros, all with PS has the variable ratio box. There was no non-variable box available.

I'll have to dig on the other stuff.
3143  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: help decode on: February 18, 2006, 12:43:34 AM
This one I actually remember.
And I maintain the CRG database and recorded the info on the car when it was for sale (three different times over the past few years).

Boatracer,
What's the condition of the car? Back together?
3144  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: help decode on: February 17, 2006, 12:19:43 AM
Car was back halved, reused the original cowl. Trans is MIA.
No idea how good of job.....
3145  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: NON POSI CAR on: February 17, 2006, 12:14:39 AM
Yes, posi was optional.
3146  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: help decode on: February 13, 2006, 02:03:14 AM
That's 9N6265xx. (posting the whole VIN isn't a problem.......)
#'s look fine, but the car had some surgery in it's life. Last I knew, it was a rolling shell.
3147  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1966 panther on: February 13, 2006, 01:49:14 AM
What's the VIN and or trim tag data? That will tell us a whole lot.......
3148  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What USCC Magazines were published before April 85? on: February 13, 2006, 01:46:54 AM
These are the ones I know of:
Aug-84 Premiere
Jan-85
Feb-85
Apr-85
May-85........
3149  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Diverter Valves on: February 12, 2006, 04:13:00 PM
I need to review some docs to compare all the numbers again. It's been too long to remember much about all the #'s. But I'm busy with a few other things (house stuff, etc) so it will be a bit.
3150  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: February 05, 2006, 01:40:42 AM
Thanks!
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 217
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.