CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 23, 2014, 05:27:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104724 Posts in 12247 Topics by 4719 Members
Latest Member: Baconcks
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 215
3091  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 10, 2006, 03:41:07 AM
The center lines of the four bolt holes are in a 3" or a 3.25" diameter circle.
3092  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 10, 2006, 03:30:02 AM
As sent, the file size was fine....

Thanks!!
Kurt
3093  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z starter question. on: March 09, 2006, 03:23:14 AM
No, I don't believe any made it to NOR.
3094  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 09, 2006, 03:21:21 AM
One or two fuel lines?

# of spring leaves was not dependent on the model, but the options.
From the site:
Generally, Z28's used 4 leaf springs and the other multi-leaf spring applications used 5 leaf springs. However, contrary to popular belief, the use of 4-leaf springs only on 68-69 Z28 cars and 5-leaf springs only on SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars was not fixed. Spring sizing was assigned as a function of weight and option - and this was especially fine-tuned in 1969. Z28s with five-leaf springs and SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars with 4-leaf springs are possible according to factory documentation and they have been observed (Z28, SS, L30/M20) on original cars. We have not yet observed a COPO, LM1, or L65 car with 4-leaf springs, but believe it to be a possible outcome, depending on ordering options.
3095  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LT1 Question and For Sale on: March 07, 2006, 10:01:27 AM
Really simple. The LT1 was not even designed by then, so it can't be one.
And the 2 bolt / 4 bolt useage is something you have to confirm with the block. The engine plant used *both* for exactly the same application.

And the HQ stamp is correct. 255 hp is a 4 bbl motor, not a 2 bbl.

3096  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Interior RPO options on: March 06, 2006, 04:59:08 PM
This is really easy. 716 is Ivory Houndstooth, a deluxe interior. Dlx interior = Z87.

In 68, Z87 included all the Z23 features.
http://www.camaros.org/options.shtml#CustomSpecialInterior
3097  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: My Mystery '67 Camaro on: March 06, 2006, 04:47:54 PM
Confirm the #'s and let us know.

You don't know if the VIN is for a L6 or V8.

Might be able to get a title thru one of those companies.
Then you might be able to get new tag (not easy to do).

Or just get a state assigned VIN.

Me, I would have passed on it.....
3098  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LT1 Question and For Sale on: March 06, 2006, 04:35:50 PM
Can't be a LT1, it's a year too early.
It's a LM1, just a letter off.... 350/255hp with manual trans.

Can you email me a larger version of that enginepad picture? KurtS2@peoplepc.com

Do you know for sure it's a 4 bolt main block?

Did the RS it came out of have a 12 bolt axle?

Thanks!

3099  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: help decode on: March 06, 2006, 03:02:54 AM
I saw some of your posts questioning the brevity of my replies. It's simple, that's what I have for notes on the car.
Thought I was being helpful....
3100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1966 panther on: March 06, 2006, 12:03:24 AM
Without the VIN and tag info, I'm not believing that it's not a regular Camaro. Titling it a different year is actually pretty easy...
The story goes against how GM handled prototype cars.
3101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Trunk Mat on: March 05, 2006, 11:58:09 PM
I take it you have a deluxe interior car?
3102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: My Mystery '67 Camaro on: March 05, 2006, 11:55:29 PM
Are you sure on the VIN?
If the VIN is right, then believe the gold cause the tag is not original to the car.... Sad

And missing the VIN tag is a big problem..... Did you get a title?
3103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Diverter Valves on: March 05, 2006, 09:54:12 AM
Thanks for the info. It sure looks like my article is wrong, but it will be a while til I get to this.
3104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Question of build date vs. rear assembly date on: March 01, 2006, 11:46:41 AM
Steve,
What year and which plant?
3105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: EARLY 69 CAMARO on: February 23, 2006, 01:28:55 AM
Rob,
By me or Daniel.... Smiley
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 215
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 18 queries.