CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 20, 2014, 09:39:03 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103280 Posts in 12153 Topics by 4689 Members
Latest Member: merle
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 212
3091  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 ss rs 396 325 hp fan on: January 10, 2006, 04:42:24 AM
Most L35 cars got the 4 blader.
I've looked at enough docs to say that. Smiley
3092  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 SS determination on: January 10, 2006, 04:39:12 AM
After 1/1/69, any dual fuel line car had to be an SS.
No trans, right?  Let us know when you find the axle code.
3093  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1968 Z/28 block code "MI" COPO 9665 info. on: January 09, 2006, 03:13:57 PM
Kinda thought so, format looked familiar. At least 2 or 3 websites republished his info.

I'd say it's an urban legend until I see some docs....
3094  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 SS determination on: January 09, 2006, 03:08:48 PM
A few weeks too early to easily tell.

You looked on top of the gas tank for the broadcast sheet?
3095  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 ss rs 396 325 hp fan on: January 09, 2006, 02:02:12 AM
Earl,
Please don't post the same question in multiple forums, once is fine. Smiley  I deleted the other two posts.
Thanks!
3096  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 SS determination on: January 09, 2006, 01:51:27 AM
Could you post the VIN, cowl tag, and axle code (see Decoding for a sketch)?
3097  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1968 Z/28 block code "MI" COPO 9665 info. on: January 09, 2006, 01:29:45 AM
What was the info source? I see a couple of websites that all say exactly the same thing (i.e. all from the same source) and also say there's a MF code 350 that was COPO 9665.
I recall seeing about a MI block years ago, never seen a MI block though, nor heard of COPO 9665. Did they say what it included?

Oops, need to correct that 9737 info. In 68, it basically was a L78 and a 140 speedo.
3098  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: DZ 302 ENGINE PAINT OVERSPRAY on: January 05, 2006, 11:08:27 AM
See http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=UBB10&Number=177727&page=0&fpart=all, where it was discussed in detail. Smiley

Smog pump wasn't installed yet, so no overspray.
3099  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: drive train on: January 04, 2006, 11:14:58 PM
Posi was an option.
I'd leave it.
L48 = 350/300 hp engine
3100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: drive train on: January 04, 2006, 02:36:25 PM
>and get rid of a 12bolt and replace it with a 10bolt.
And replace it with a 10 bolt that is perfectly dated.

Reread my posts. I believe it probably is original.
An SS auto would have 3.07 gears as standard. 2.73 would be the economy gear.
3101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 03, 2006, 10:39:39 PM
No, nothing on either of those VINs. Sad
3102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: drive train on: January 03, 2006, 09:15:52 PM
It is very late for that car. He originally posted on camaros.net.
My response was:
That axle date is *really* close. So close that I'd say it's possible that it's original. If so, it's the only exception I've seen in 69.
GM docs do indicate that all 69 L48 autos were to get 10 bolts, but that's not what happened.
3103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967-1968 396 production numbers on: January 03, 2006, 09:08:10 PM
http://www.camaros.org/options.shtml#RPOSpreadsheet has all that info in it. Smiley
3104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Factory Marking FYI on: January 03, 2006, 06:22:16 PM
The complete front doghouse was painted by Chevy (not Fisher) and had to meet up with the body. That panel was where they chose to write codes, for whatever reason.
3105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Factory Marking FYI on: January 02, 2006, 09:19:33 PM
I doubt it is for Manual trans. That wouldn't affect sheetmetal. Could be a code for something, like which emblem to use or ??.
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 212
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 18 queries.