CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 12:17:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106516 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 220
3091  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Transmission, Rear End and Trim tag on: August 10, 2006, 05:41:54 PM
Mark,
I had it noted that your car had a 3.73 gear. I don't think that trans and rear are close enough to be original. I take it the trans code is P8R30, not B8R30.

Can you send me a pic of the tag?
3092  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Smog tube question. on: August 09, 2006, 12:44:20 AM
It's a plating. No idea of the name of it. I worked for Rochester Products (carbs, etc) - they had numerous different platings that they used, for different reasons, all slightly different in color.
3093  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: m 11 option th400 floor shift non console on: August 09, 2006, 12:39:48 AM
Very hard to find. I've seen one in a car (and have a pic) and a car that someone removed it (is your car now red?)  That's it in many years of watching....
3094  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Camaro date codes-How close?? on: August 09, 2006, 12:11:05 AM
Ken,
It came with a ZC rad, per both my article and the broadcast sheet. Smiley
What was the date of the distributor that broke when you pulled it?

The carb tag is K8, Nov 68. There may be a Julian date also stamped on the carb body.

What is the alternator part # and date (as stamped)?

Thanks!
3095  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: RS/SS options on: August 07, 2006, 03:07:06 PM
RS is just an appearance package, available on any car.
SS required a 350 or a 396 (and a 12 bolt in 67/68).

Those cars sound like clones.
3096  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 camaro 327 exhaust manifold #'s needed on: August 07, 2006, 03:04:10 PM
Plugs weren't used in the exhaust manifolds on non-A.I.R. engines - they used the same 527 and 826 castings, but they weren't drilled or tapped for the air manifolds. The only engines that used factory-installed plugs in the exhaust manifold openings were those that specified RPO KD1 (Less Air Injection) for overseas export.
But since all 527 and 826 castings went on manual trans cars, all were drilled and tapped. Never seen either of those manifolds not drilled and tapped.
Lots of BB manifolds have tapped and untapped versions.
3097  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Seat belt color question for a 723 interior, 11C build. on: August 07, 2006, 01:26:06 AM
My thoughts:
We need to update that note and I need to finish my seatbelt article.

Your belts are original and black.

Most 723 std belts were black.
3098  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Paint code question on: August 06, 2006, 11:58:47 PM
Cortez Silver. But you didn't post the interior code, so we don't know that part.
3099  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Can anyone decode 1969 RS/SS ? on: August 06, 2006, 11:38:26 PM
Did you see http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml? I list some thing to check.

What's the axle code?
3100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 camaro 327 exhaust manifold #'s needed on: August 06, 2006, 11:22:22 PM
The A.I.R. ports are clearly visible with the factory installed hex plugs still there. Plugs were installed since the 327 engine that it was originally installed on did not have A.I.R. (3 speed manual trans). 

That car would have had a smog system on it from the factory. All manual small blocks had them in 69. Smiley
3101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COPO? on: August 05, 2006, 03:38:05 AM
It's still a possible, but will be *really* hard to prove one way or the other.

What's the date on the radiator (see rad article under Reports) and the heater core?
3102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: SS350 with 255hp engine on: August 01, 2006, 01:11:22 AM
Try http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml for more LM1 info.

But something's not right. LM1's were early cars. 714 interiors were late.

Can you post the tag info and engine code?
3103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COPO? on: August 01, 2006, 12:52:14 AM
And what is the trans code?
3104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: '70 Camaro question for JohnZ on: June 26, 2006, 04:51:57 PM
I have some 70 Camaro data. This car doesn't fit; it looks like a retag to me.
3105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Delco T I ignition system on: June 26, 2006, 02:29:49 PM
http://www.camaros.org/trans_ign.shtml
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 220
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.