CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 02, 2015, 11:44:38 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110411 Posts in 12754 Topics by 4890 Members
Latest Member: jay1970
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 230
3091  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: VIN database ? on: February 05, 2007, 12:39:00 AM
I maintain the db. Send me an email.
3092  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Camaro battery on: February 05, 2007, 12:32:23 AM
Anyone have any experience with this place? Car Man's Garage -  http://www.carmansgarage.com/category/vintage.restorationbatteries/
They only have the R59, but it sounds interesting. They say the batteries have modern internals. Reseller?

Poking around, I found at least 3 other manufacturers (I assume none are not resellers):
* Axion Power Battery New Castle, PA 16105   724-654-9300
(sounds like the company that bought New Castle Battery)

* Restoration Battery, Cincinnati, OH   513-574-4481

* Antique Auto Battery, Hudson, OH    800-426-7580
3093  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: '69 exhaust manifold. on: February 04, 2007, 10:30:52 PM
http://www.camaros.org/emissions.shtml has smog info.
3094  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Old forum available on: February 04, 2007, 10:15:40 PM
The link is still there in the big 'News' box on the main forum page.

http://www.camaros.org/cgi-bin/webbbs4.33/cuscrg/cuscrg.pl
3095  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Barrett-Jackson lawsuit on: February 04, 2007, 10:12:38 PM
That blue JL8 car sold at auction a few months ago for $140K. This time $162.5K.
3096  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: trim tag body #s? on: February 04, 2007, 03:31:43 PM
They reset the body # at the beginning of the model year and did not reset during the model year (ie no when the 70's came out). There is no such thing as a 70 1/2.
3097  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Typo in crg reports - cooling on: January 30, 2007, 03:00:37 PM
Martin measured that one for me:
3857042 body is 1 9/32" plus tit is 5/32"

Martin, can you confirm that dimension?

Rob, what is your measurement of the part?
3098  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Seat Belt Tag on: January 29, 2007, 04:15:43 PM
No idea.
I just redid the drivetrain decoding section (to be published soon) and am working on a couple of other things too.
3099  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Winshield Washer Bottle on: January 29, 2007, 02:58:10 AM
No.
3100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Camaro battery on: January 29, 2007, 02:57:41 AM
I'd looked into this in detail a little bit ago. The change happened in May, Jerry's car is one of the first. April cars are all top posts. I had it narrowed down to exactly when, but I need to look again.

Usages:
67, 68, and early 69 L6, 307, and Z28: The standard battery was the Delco Y55 (reverse polarity)

67, 68, and early 69 327, 350, 396, and 427: The standard battery was the R59 (61 A-hr).

Late 69 L6, 307, and Z28: The standard battery became the Delco Y77 with side posts.

Late 69 350, 396, and 427: The standard battery became the Delco R79 with side posts.
3101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Seat Belt Tag on: January 29, 2007, 02:37:52 AM
Here's the info from my uncompleted seatbelt article (just was working on it again, that's good!)

Location                   Standard   Deluxe
Front lap, bucket seat   237         137
Center lap, bench seat  235         131
Front shoulder       277 (coupe)177 (coupe)
                           ?   (convertible) ?  (convertible)
Rear lap                      231          131

Dates:
A one or two digit number indicating the production week, a single letter (apparently related to which plant (or possibly production line) produced the part), and the two-digit calendar year number.
3102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Is this vin in the CRG database? on: January 27, 2007, 11:03:00 PM
Paul,
The car would have been built at the end of Feb, beginning of March. So that engine date looks fine. Smiley

Problem with finding the car is
1 - it's not around anymore
2 - it's not registered. Someone looking for my Z would not find it via the DMV because I've never registered it. So the car could just be sitting in a garage somewhere in pieces.
I'd say the chance of finding it are low, but we have reunited several (blocks, POP's, etc) with the original cars over the years, so the chances are not zero. Smiley

Thanks for the pics!
3103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: carburetor codes on: January 27, 2007, 12:15:03 AM
CH = Factory Inspector on Production Line

Nope. Smiley
CH = broadcast code.
3104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Is this vin in the CRG database? on: January 25, 2007, 06:45:22 PM
No, it's not in there.
Can I get a good picture of the engine pad?
Thanks!
3105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z munice on: January 24, 2007, 02:28:07 AM
No. Just data gather over years of work.
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 230
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.107 seconds with 18 queries.