CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 06:15:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105860 Posts in 12353 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 218
3091  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: ac delco voltage regulator part number for 68 L34? on: May 01, 2006, 04:00:38 AM
All covers should be screwed on. I have seen 2 different kinds of screws used.

Ed, I recognize that reg pic. Smiley
Here's another shot of the 05E date. Note the pencil marks on the side.
3092  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Cowl Tag Date and Engine Build Date on: April 25, 2006, 08:55:59 PM
Yes, I did. And it's always been our policy not to disclose details on why a tag looks like a repro tag. It's not because it's too clean.

Out of 11,000+ cars in the database, not one has a build date that's off by a month.
3093  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '67/'68 clutch FAN, ...4 rivets ....not 5? on: April 24, 2006, 09:26:50 PM
There is one fan used in 67, 912239, that did use five rivets. Never seen it on a 68.

Need to finish the update to that cooling report...
3094  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: SS Hupcaps on: April 24, 2006, 09:24:12 PM
Have to say that is a P&A34 date that I haven't seen before. Would be a good one for 68 guys....
3095  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: L78 engine code help on: April 24, 2006, 02:03:43 AM
That might be in Jerry's book, but Camaro continued using the 2 digit code from what I've seen. I've only heard of one or two exceptions and have not seen pics of those pads.....
3096  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Cowl Tag Date and Engine Build Date on: April 24, 2006, 01:57:14 AM
There are anomalies, but this tag does not appear to be one. That's after comparing it to literally thousands of other tags. Reproduction tags have been around for decades. Maybe the tag was missing, who knows.

"The pacecar contact suspects it is an 05A that has been mis-stamped."
And did they state whether or not they thought the tag was original? I had another pacecar member state to me that they did not think it was original.
3097  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Cowl Tag Date and Engine Build Date on: April 18, 2006, 01:50:57 PM
Not sure what the fear is in having the numbers out there. Most ebay ads have the numbers listed, or go to a car show....

To answer the question, I was able to dig the pics out of my internet temp directory. After comparing the tag pic to the many others I have, my opinion is that it is not original. Sad
Which explains why the #'s don't line up, but not how the tag got there.

3098  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: What? on: April 15, 2006, 02:56:06 AM
Axle is from an early 70's Nova.
3099  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 Cowl Tag Date and Engine Build Date on: April 12, 2006, 12:15:32 AM
It could be just a date misstamp by Fisher Body. That's what it kinda looks like, but that is pretty rare and the #'s just don't line up right.
I agree with Daniel, pics would help.

It appears to be a IPC replica, probably ordered by the dealer after they were no longer available. Or it could just be a car with the exact same colors and options. Smiley
What's the code on the transmission?
3100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COWL TAG HAS ME PUZZLED.. Is it worth while? on: April 11, 2006, 11:01:34 PM
Here's the pics, front and back. Nice shots!
3101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COWL TAG HAS ME PUZZLED.. Is it worth while? on: April 11, 2006, 01:28:19 PM
I just looked thru similarly dated trim tags, have never seen that typo before.
Feel free to email me the pic if you can't post it.
3102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396 fan clutch, ...correct PN(s)?? photos? on: April 10, 2006, 09:10:00 PM
Ed,
I've seen that clutch code before, pretty sure it's not original.

68 fan clutch broadcast codes appear to be 1 letter, btw.
3103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Deluxe interior seat belts on: April 10, 2006, 08:34:14 PM
Std and dlx belts for bright blue interior were bright blue.
Deluxe belts would be Hamill's.
3104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Caps for 69 (68?) RS windshield washer bracket on: April 10, 2006, 08:26:40 PM
Here's a pic of originals on a 69.
I think there's only 3, pretty sure that's what the AIM says (mine is packed away right now).

Kurt
3105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Still confused on Smog systems!!!! on: March 28, 2006, 01:08:40 AM
No advantage.
AIR is a relatively primitive system. It tries to complete the combustion in the exhaust. Better to have a better design (like any newer car has) and complete the combustion in the combustion chamber....
Pages: 1 ... 205 206 [207] 208 209 ... 218
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.112 seconds with 18 queries.