CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2014, 10:09:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107504 Posts in 12505 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 ... 223
3076  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 gas cap on: October 26, 2006, 12:40:20 AM
I recall that the wording on the caps is different.
3077  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Pics of Palomino Ivory '68s? on: October 24, 2006, 08:34:25 PM
There's one that comes to Superfest, but I know I don't have a pic of it. It's not common.....
3078  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 Z VIN NUMBER on: October 24, 2006, 08:33:21 PM
Nope. Sorry.
3079  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 68 RS center grille on: October 24, 2006, 08:12:26 PM
If I'm thinking of the right car, Kevin's car is 04C.
3080  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: AD or YH wheels on: October 24, 2006, 07:58:51 PM
CBTN has a few errors in it, not many. And this isn't really an error but a wheel documentation issue.


3081  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: AD or YH wheels on: October 24, 2006, 02:05:43 PM
That's incorrect.
YH started at the end of Dec.
Those wheels are out there, I have a set for my car.....
3082  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z database on: October 24, 2006, 01:58:46 PM
You mean the rear bulkhead crayon marking?
And lots of details (see 69 ID table).
3083  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z database on: October 24, 2006, 01:15:10 AM
I agree the rivets add a question mark to the car, but it does not mean it isn't "the real deal".
3084  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: STANDARD INT WITH DELUXE SEAT BELTS on: October 23, 2006, 01:48:59 PM
And to even confuse things more, some interior colors (like red) had black std belts, but the dlx belts were colored to match the interior.
3085  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z database on: October 23, 2006, 01:17:02 PM
Why do you say that?
Do you personally know the car?
3086  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 spoiler question on: October 20, 2006, 01:47:29 AM
Me. Smiley
3087  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 307/327/350 on: October 19, 2006, 02:36:01 AM
What's the axle code?
3088  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: original big block heads on: October 18, 2006, 10:36:59 PM
I thought this was discussed on one of the other forums too....

Have you confirmed the different valve sizes and spark plug seats?

John can confirm this: If the 291 had the same fit and function as the 840, the engine plant would use either.
cc volume probably isn't different enough to be an issue. Different valve size and spark plug design would not be the same funtion, but I'd like that confirmed on this engine first since I've heard different valve sizes and plug designs on the 291 head. 
3089  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Starter part number on: October 18, 2006, 10:03:48 PM
I don't think that's correct. Starter motors were superceded for service so those listings are often incorrect.

Try 1108338, 350 4bbl w/ manual.

3090  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z database on: October 18, 2006, 10:20:36 AM
Nothing on that car.
Tag is supposed to be attached with rivets, just not that type. Smiley

Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 ... 223
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.268 seconds with 18 queries.