CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2014, 09:07:16 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103754 Posts in 12185 Topics by 4698 Members
Latest Member: Ed miles
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 ... 212
3076  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 30, 2006, 12:45:14 AM
I didn't have anything on your car.
Down by the oil filter is surprising. What's the engine date?
3077  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 console seat belt clips on: January 29, 2006, 12:44:35 AM
http://www.camaros.org/TopicsofResearch.shtml#1967Topics
3078  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Z/28 date code on: January 29, 2006, 12:29:31 AM
As I said last year Smiley, you never know what's been done to a car over the years, but those dates look OK.
3079  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Identify 12 bolt on: January 29, 2006, 12:17:47 AM
No need to post the same question on both this board and camaros.net. You'll get good answers from both places. Smiley
3080  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 29, 2006, 12:16:04 AM
The size of the trim tag is not an indicator whether or not it's a Z. I've seen other 11A cars with the large trim tag, including L6 cars.
Hope this helps....
3081  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z/28 ORIGINAL 302 OR NOT? on: January 25, 2006, 11:14:31 PM
#'s look OK.
1st week of Oct (1969) car. Engine assembled 10/03. 3.73 posi built 10/07. Both dates look fine. I'd have to see a pic of the engine pad to tell if it's original.
What's the stamped code off of the transmission?
3082  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Repop spiral shock absorbers on: January 24, 2006, 11:58:55 PM
D&R is repro'ing them. Bet these are those repro parts. Nice lookers, not useable for driving.....
3083  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 24, 2006, 11:47:13 PM
Wayne,
Not in that timeframe. They were running all out then, parts came in and went right into a car. They didn't sit around.  I had to go back 43,000 cars before yours to see an axle with a date close to that......
Coded correct, but not dated correct, IMO. Not to say that some judging standards wouldn't say it was acceptable.
3084  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 17, 2006, 02:16:59 AM
Hi Ed,
Sorry, nothing on that VIN.
As I said above, unless we've run across the car or documentation on the car, it's not likely to be in there. No problem checking. Smiley
3085  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: unknown trim package?....or just options???69 on: January 17, 2006, 02:11:26 AM
Sounds like you have Z21 style trim and Z23 special interior or Z87 deluxe int.
3086  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Yenko interior on: January 16, 2006, 05:22:51 PM
711 was the only interior ordered by Yenko in 69.
3087  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z28 Database on: January 15, 2006, 03:40:23 PM
No, nothing on those VINs.
3088  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Fischer Body Sequence numbers who to ask or inquire about 1980 data on: January 15, 2006, 03:38:28 PM
I assume that for 2nd gens, the body # is still the order tracking #.
As Mike says, it's not a decodeable #.
3089  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: decoding transmission on: January 14, 2006, 11:02:52 PM
Don't know much about powerglides. I'll just refer you to Colvin's CBTN.
And as long as it looks right and fits, it should be fine. The pan had the trans code on it and it sounds like it was replaced.

3090  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 SS determination on: January 12, 2006, 02:56:06 AM
That is a Pontiac axle, cast in April of 68.
Here's where a Pontiac axle is stamped, backside of other tube.


59 is Frost Green, as popular as Garnet Red or Daytona Yellow, about 7% of 69 Camaros.
Whatever you want to call it, A732 is just an internal Fisher Body code....

That  brake valve was also used on non-SS cars.

Not really much to go on. From what's there, only evidence of being an SS is the hood springs. Everything else indicates an SS or a LM1 (ordered with discs and duals).  Odds are slightly in your favor of being an SS, but doubt you'll ever know for sure. Nothing that would prove it to another buyer at least....
Pages: 1 ... 204 205 [206] 207 208 ... 212
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.243 seconds with 18 queries.