CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 30, 2015, 02:59:25 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109283 Posts in 12656 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 228
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: January 13, 2015, 08:14:43 PM
Do you know what week the first L35 was built.

Closest I can pin it to for Camaro is November 1966, so yes, there may be some T11 L35 67 Camaro's.
That's bad info.
First cars were in Jan.
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vin check on: January 13, 2015, 08:08:59 PM
The hinges are different and won't interchange.
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: original engine on: January 13, 2015, 08:08:13 PM
If you believe that calendar was implemented at the assembly plants as written, I have a 5-mile ZL1 I'll sell you cheap. Or a bridge, your choice.
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Best 302 Air Cleaner Decal on: January 13, 2015, 08:04:56 PM
The xram labels are just someone's imagination.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hi everyone, new guy here...... on: January 13, 2015, 08:00:39 PM
I assume your friend added the gauges. I see he replaced the door panels too. Wink
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vin check on: January 12, 2015, 01:31:52 PM
Yikes, sounds a little scary title-wise.

No on the db.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Identifying this big block on: January 12, 2015, 01:30:35 PM
Not sure what more we can tell you.
http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=321002
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hi everyone, new guy here...... on: January 12, 2015, 01:25:54 PM
Lukken - that a new dealer to me.
Notice the paint code is on the bottom of the broadcast sheet.

Thanks!
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: January 11, 2015, 01:11:40 PM
You're assuming production started on Jan 1. I've never seen that in writing that I recall.

Lead time - for what aspect? Filling the pipeline, from where to where?
Design to production?
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Motor vin stamp vs. transmission vin stamp on: January 11, 2015, 01:03:50 PM
<< When you bare naked, it did have engine code? >>

Photo below was shot at Tarrytown in 1959, but engine state of dress from the engine plant didn't change any from then to 1969; the block pad had the engine plant machine stamp, but the only bolt-on part on the engine was the distributor.

That's a whole bunch of 283 double barrel injuns. I love the painted ram's horns exhaust manifolds - never seen that one before. Slick -
I added that pic to John's article years ago.
http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml#chev
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hi everyone, new guy here...... on: January 11, 2015, 12:29:35 PM
I'm curious on the docs. Smiley
Don't see many broadcast sheets for a 68. Is it a chassis or body sheet?
Like the original stripes, looks good.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 124679N622875 & 124679L527807 69 Pace cars on: January 11, 2015, 12:25:02 PM
9N622875 - don't know much about it but the tag was/is repro.

9L527807  http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=116378

The craigslist car has been on ebay a few times recently.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct engine paint suggestions please! on: January 09, 2015, 01:36:55 AM
Looks good.
Why without the waterpump?
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 07, 2015, 05:48:17 PM
No need to start a new thread. You'll just get the same responses / requests. Smiley
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: More 69 Z/28 Ebay fraud on: January 07, 2015, 04:43:52 PM
The same thread is running on TC, so the VIN is out there with this info. But I'll pare this thread.

I'd like to rachet down the ebay policing a notch. Just notifying (with tact and discretion) the seller that the tag has issues is sufficient.
I listed something on ebay the other day and someone contacted me that it was incorrect. I researched and many were listed incorrectly, hence my error. Deleted and relisted correctly. My point is notification is all that needs to happen. It's up to the seller to do more research.

I should add that cars like this aren't always added to the db. Very little data of research value and every entry takes more time than you'd think (noting source, comments, pics, etc).

I do save the pics. I will mention the file format I use since it may help others when looking for a pic.
We use the VIN in the title, e.g. tag_9N673525_NOR108403_repro.jpg  and vin_9N673525.jpg.
If you search for the VIN on your computer, then you can find the pic. Wink

That's why regular members post these Trim Tags and VIN's, isn't it? To help out fellow enthusiast's?
And that's why I highly suggest adding the VIN to any thread about a car. Often VIN pics or tag pics are added, but the VIN itself needs to be there too.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 228
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.126 seconds with 18 queries.