CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2014, 03:31:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97557 Posts in 11721 Topics by 4582 Members
Latest Member: gplus
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 206
2941  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 69 L48 - 2 or 4 bolt mains on: March 16, 2006, 03:31:44 AM
I wanted to know if others have seen 1969 L48 engines with 2 bolt mains. Most have 4 bolts, but some are 2 bolts. How common is this??
2942  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 LM1 production figures on: March 16, 2006, 01:17:00 AM
10,406 people ordered the LM1 option in 1969, a little over 12% of the production for the first four months of the model year, but only 4.2 % of overall 69 production.

No breakdown by model, but 2 LM1 ragtops are on ebay right now. Smiley
2943  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 15, 2006, 05:50:22 PM
Yes. It won't fit correctly/completely in the fan shroud and you won't get the cooling you want.
2944  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: VIN plate color on: March 15, 2006, 02:31:03 AM
Via the broadcast sheet.
2945  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decode 69 396/375 on: March 15, 2006, 12:45:19 AM
Not trying to be smart, but did you look on this site? Specifically: http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#XnnCodes

What are the #'s from the engine and trans?

Seats and door panels are white. That's it, everything else is black.
2946  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 15, 2006, 12:33:50 AM
Yes, the two fans require different clutches. I'll reword that part of the article.
2947  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 13, 2006, 11:19:24 AM
Axle doesn't look original either (could be, but very doubtful).

Does it have big block frame mounts (one side is higher than the other by 1")?

Does if have the rear brake valve on the subframe on the driver's door?
2948  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 13, 2006, 11:12:41 AM
M8 pic.
2949  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 13, 2006, 12:28:04 AM

I guess I'm still a bit confused, I have a small block so it should be the 3" diameter, correct?

The CRG page shows this:  ........

You wrote:
> I am trying to figure out the difference that CRG calls out with the 3" or 3.25" on the fans.

That's the difference, hence my response above.

Yes, you should have the 3" version.

Lake,
Make sure you measure to the centerline of the holes, not to the edges.
2950  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 12, 2006, 11:44:36 PM
I'm pretty sure the M8 is not a cast date, it was for something else. It was the wrong size and was missing the day code.
2951  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 12, 2006, 11:38:21 PM
What's the axle code, it's located on the passenger side axle tube.
http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#RearAxleNumbers
2952  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 10, 2006, 03:41:07 AM
The center lines of the four bolt holes are in a 3" or a 3.25" diameter circle.
2953  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 10, 2006, 03:30:02 AM
As sent, the file size was fine....

Thanks!!
Kurt
2954  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z starter question. on: March 09, 2006, 03:23:14 AM
No, I don't believe any made it to NOR.
2955  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 09, 2006, 03:21:21 AM
One or two fuel lines?

# of spring leaves was not dependent on the model, but the options.
From the site:
Generally, Z28's used 4 leaf springs and the other multi-leaf spring applications used 5 leaf springs. However, contrary to popular belief, the use of 4-leaf springs only on 68-69 Z28 cars and 5-leaf springs only on SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars was not fixed. Spring sizing was assigned as a function of weight and option - and this was especially fine-tuned in 1969. Z28s with five-leaf springs and SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars with 4-leaf springs are possible according to factory documentation and they have been observed (Z28, SS, L30/M20) on original cars. We have not yet observed a COPO, LM1, or L65 car with 4-leaf springs, but believe it to be a possible outcome, depending on ordering options.
Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 206
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.