CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 03:48:50 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97162 Posts in 11688 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 206
2941  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decode 69 396/375 on: March 15, 2006, 12:45:19 AM
Not trying to be smart, but did you look on this site? Specifically: http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#XnnCodes

What are the #'s from the engine and trans?

Seats and door panels are white. That's it, everything else is black.
2942  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 15, 2006, 12:33:50 AM
Yes, the two fans require different clutches. I'll reword that part of the article.
2943  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 13, 2006, 11:19:24 AM
Axle doesn't look original either (could be, but very doubtful).

Does it have big block frame mounts (one side is higher than the other by 1")?

Does if have the rear brake valve on the subframe on the driver's door?
2944  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 13, 2006, 11:12:41 AM
M8 pic.
2945  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 13, 2006, 12:28:04 AM

I guess I'm still a bit confused, I have a small block so it should be the 3" diameter, correct?

The CRG page shows this:  ........

You wrote:
> I am trying to figure out the difference that CRG calls out with the 3" or 3.25" on the fans.

That's the difference, hence my response above.

Yes, you should have the 3" version.

Lake,
Make sure you measure to the centerline of the holes, not to the edges.
2946  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 12, 2006, 11:44:36 PM
I'm pretty sure the M8 is not a cast date, it was for something else. It was the wrong size and was missing the day code.
2947  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 12, 2006, 11:38:21 PM
What's the axle code, it's located on the passenger side axle tube.
http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#RearAxleNumbers
2948  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Howdy! ...and a Fan blade question on: March 10, 2006, 03:41:07 AM
The center lines of the four bolt holes are in a 3" or a 3.25" diameter circle.
2949  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: EARLY 69 NORWOOD ALTERNATE VIN on: March 10, 2006, 03:30:02 AM
As sent, the file size was fine....

Thanks!!
Kurt
2950  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z starter question. on: March 09, 2006, 03:23:14 AM
No, I don't believe any made it to NOR.
2951  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS on: March 09, 2006, 03:21:21 AM
One or two fuel lines?

# of spring leaves was not dependent on the model, but the options.
From the site:
Generally, Z28's used 4 leaf springs and the other multi-leaf spring applications used 5 leaf springs. However, contrary to popular belief, the use of 4-leaf springs only on 68-69 Z28 cars and 5-leaf springs only on SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars was not fixed. Spring sizing was assigned as a function of weight and option - and this was especially fine-tuned in 1969. Z28s with five-leaf springs and SS, L30/M20, LM1, L65, and COPO cars with 4-leaf springs are possible according to factory documentation and they have been observed (Z28, SS, L30/M20) on original cars. We have not yet observed a COPO, LM1, or L65 car with 4-leaf springs, but believe it to be a possible outcome, depending on ordering options.
2952  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LT1 Question and For Sale on: March 07, 2006, 10:01:27 AM
Really simple. The LT1 was not even designed by then, so it can't be one.
And the 2 bolt / 4 bolt useage is something you have to confirm with the block. The engine plant used *both* for exactly the same application.

And the HQ stamp is correct. 255 hp is a 4 bbl motor, not a 2 bbl.

2953  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Interior RPO options on: March 06, 2006, 04:59:08 PM
This is really easy. 716 is Ivory Houndstooth, a deluxe interior. Dlx interior = Z87.

In 68, Z87 included all the Z23 features.
http://www.camaros.org/options.shtml#CustomSpecialInterior
2954  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: My Mystery '67 Camaro on: March 06, 2006, 04:47:54 PM
Confirm the #'s and let us know.

You don't know if the VIN is for a L6 or V8.

Might be able to get a title thru one of those companies.
Then you might be able to get new tag (not easy to do).

Or just get a state assigned VIN.

Me, I would have passed on it.....
2955  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LT1 Question and For Sale on: March 06, 2006, 04:35:50 PM
Can't be a LT1, it's a year too early.
It's a LM1, just a letter off.... 350/255hp with manual trans.

Can you email me a larger version of that enginepad picture? KurtS2@peoplepc.com

Do you know for sure it's a 4 bolt main block?

Did the RS it came out of have a 12 bolt axle?

Thanks!

Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 206
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 18 queries.