CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 04:52:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103807 Posts in 12190 Topics by 4702 Members
Latest Member: Subarurider
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 213
2941  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Starter part number on: October 18, 2006, 10:03:48 PM
I don't think that's correct. Starter motors were superceded for service so those listings are often incorrect.

Try 1108338, 350 4bbl w/ manual.

2942  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z database on: October 18, 2006, 10:20:36 AM
Nothing on that car.
Tag is supposed to be attached with rivets, just not that type. Smiley

2943  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Originally a 6 cyl, now a SS 396 Clone on: October 10, 2006, 11:43:12 PM
To answer your question, other than the fuel line, the base car is the same.
So it all depends on how good of job they did.
Did they: change axle, change front and rear springs, add disc brakes(assuming it was a drum brake car), etc? If they did it right, it can be hard to tell a clone from a real one.
They could have just installed a BB and drove on. That's just a hillbilly hack then.....
2944  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Dates on: October 10, 2006, 01:15:42 AM
I'll just repost what I posted yesterday:
It should be in a couple of places on the site, but from http://www.camaros.org/geninfo.shtml#HowMany:
"....and build week dates did not always align exactly with calendar weeks."
It was for Fisher's internal useage, so it didn't have to be exact.

Specifically, sometimes the week would have started on Monday, sometimes on Tuesday, sometimes on the following Monday.
2945  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Calendar question, when is the first week of a month? on: October 09, 2006, 01:18:44 AM
It should be in a couple of places on the site, but from http://www.camaros.org/geninfo.shtml#HowMany:
"....and build week dates did not always align exactly with calendar weeks."
It was for Fisher's internal useage, so it didn't have to be exact.
2946  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: NOR '68 TRim question ..." 7129" ? on: October 09, 2006, 01:15:21 AM
Can I get a picture of the tag (and the pad if possible)?

Yes, I have seen the engine VIN off by a digit on rare occasions.

Thanks!
2947  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Z/28 database questions on: October 07, 2006, 10:00:04 PM
Emailed.
2948  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Fan and orientation? on: October 05, 2006, 12:51:55 AM
There was no HD cooling or fan option on a L78.
It should be a 5 blade fan and a 3 core rad. 
2949  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Los Angeles Production Numbers on: October 04, 2006, 02:49:51 PM
Los Angeles, Calif
2950  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Z/28 Holley 4053 DZ questions on: October 04, 2006, 01:11:32 AM
Go with the closer one. Remember that was the build date of the body, car was completed several days later.
2951  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct locaton of proportionong valve on sub frame on: October 02, 2006, 01:41:31 AM
Picture emailed. Smiley
2952  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring clean original trunk, touch up or strip it??? on: September 29, 2006, 12:19:24 AM
I wouldn't do the trunk. From what I've seen, that car is too clean. Everyone has a restored car. You can have real nice looking, mostly original car. Just shoot the outside and clean up what needs cleaned.

And you probably can't get splatter paint to ever look that nice. The repro stuff doesn't look the same...
2953  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Best way to preserve the build sheet? on: September 29, 2006, 12:06:09 AM
Laminating it doesn't meet archival standards. I'd second the slip cover suggestion. Or ask a musuem how they'd store it.....

I'd be interested in a scan or picture of your broadcast sheet. Don't see many for 68's....

Thanks!
2954  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: X Codes on: September 26, 2006, 12:08:07 AM
Sounds like one fuel line.
What's the VIN and axle code? http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#RearAxleNumbers
2955  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 wiper transmission and cowl plenum area color on: September 24, 2006, 10:21:18 PM
John, my mistake, I thought we had discussed your cowl plenum being blacked out.

Dave69x33,
RamAirDave's pics are of a black striped car, so the plenum is painted black as expected.

I'd say John's article is accurate, the assembly process as described is how they made the cars. Original cars confirm this.

Pacers would not have had much an impact on processing, since they were spread out over 2-3 months.

Yes, that pacer is very original. It was here in MI in the original family. Looks like it's been sold or someone (Jim?) moved.

Pages: 1 ... 195 196 [197] 198 199 ... 213
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.323 seconds with 18 queries.