CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 21, 2015, 12:07:57 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112138 Posts in 12882 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 188 189 [190] 191 192 ... 233
2836  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: DX-1 Stripe on: November 04, 2007, 11:11:52 AM
The D88 multi-colored nose stripe was in 68. Zero production total.
There's a promo picture of it somewhere and it's in the AIM. We've seen one car with it but are not convinced it is original.
2837  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Engine Dressup Kit on: November 03, 2007, 12:27:52 AM
That sounds like the original air cleaner for a LM1 (there's a pic in the LM1 article). I think the SS350 used the same air cleaner.....
2838  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: DX-1 Stripe on: November 02, 2007, 12:41:09 AM
Yes, it was available all year...
2839  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Engine Dressup Kit on: October 31, 2007, 01:20:56 PM
That statement in the book is just bloody wrong. There never was such an option....
2840  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Authenticity? on: October 22, 2007, 08:24:33 PM
I can't make a call with those pics, but they tend to look OK.
2841  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Authenticity? on: October 22, 2007, 10:04:29 AM
Tag looks OK, IMO.
Trans looks a little early, but very possible.

Do the engine and trans have VIN stamps? Any pics of the any of the engine/trans stamps?
2842  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Steering box dates on: October 19, 2007, 02:54:32 PM
Paul,
Patience grasshopper!  Smiley

A or B (shift or plant, I've never seen it confirmed)
Then Julian date, then year (single digit).

'A 032 9' is Feb 1, 69.
2843  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 19, 2007, 02:50:44 PM
Thanks! You can see how I was confused since he says he was rod67!
2844  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 18, 2007, 10:41:01 AM
See http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=30.150

It sure appeared like the post by rod67ss is by you.

Yes I did... but it was years ago. You should find the posts under doing a T56 swap into a '67 that I did back in '98. Not sure of the date of posting - but it was under rod67. I couldn't remember my password & my Email has changed so I just registered again under rod67ss.
2845  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 17, 2007, 01:50:50 PM
Rod,
No problem.

btw, if you have problems with your ID, just email one of us and we can fix it. No need to get a new ID. Smiley
2846  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 01:49:45 PM
Appears to be OK.
2847  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Legit or not pad stamp ?? on: October 16, 2007, 12:02:30 PM
Looks like this pad, probably cause it's the same one.  Smiley
This pic is from last month, from ebay.
2848  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: orphans winners are there any on: October 13, 2007, 09:56:14 PM
I can't recall all the docs and components that have been reunited, but there have been several POP's and engines that have been reunited (not by the orphan forum specifically, but still by CRG).
2849  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: who carries correct 12 bolt car(69 camaro) multi leaf perches? on: October 11, 2007, 11:46:26 PM
Yes and Yes. Smiley
2850  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Gray sludge in oil pan on: October 11, 2007, 11:41:01 PM
Well, I'd say that having buildup in the engine says they didn't remove enough, hence the reputation from days of old.
Pennzoil used the same PA crude, same advertising, and didn't have the issue of buildup.

The stainless wire that I have is what retained the filter, btw.
Pages: 1 ... 188 189 [190] 191 192 ... 233
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 18 queries.