CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 04:39:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102524 Posts in 12094 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 188 189 [190] 191 192 ... 212
2836  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 3919803 Intake (327/275 HP and 350/295 HP???) on: January 24, 2007, 02:23:03 AM
Yes, there are some 67 L30's and L48's in the database that used that intake. All are June cars.
Yes, with 291 heads (one car has a 291 and a March 462).
2837  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 master cylinder research question on: January 21, 2007, 06:33:03 PM
I do know that casting was used across most of the Chevy line and was used for several years. I do not know when that casting was first released.
2838  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 (Sept 66) convertible on: January 21, 2007, 02:43:28 AM
Some of the very first cars built were convertibles. The pilot cars were used to prove out the production process and consisted of all models. Production (after the pilots) was generally low option cars for the first 2000 cars, then a full mix from then on out.

Can you post your trim tag data?

Yeah, I edited his post but couldn't figure out how to delete the poll. Smiley
2839  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 master cylinder research question on: January 21, 2007, 02:30:06 AM
I'd guess that it was changed. While they don't fail often, it wouldn't be a surprising warranty replacement item.

Thanks for taking the time to help!
2840  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 master cylinder research question on: January 16, 2007, 05:45:20 PM
Loren,
That would be great.Kevin's master cylr conflicts with some other cars. Your car is thus an interesting date to us since it's right before his car.
Thanks!
2841  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z munice on: January 16, 2007, 12:47:15 AM
The database has 14,000 67-69 Camaros in it. Most are not Z's. Smiley
Yes, you have the red Z with the X7 on the rear bulkhead, right?
2842  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Is VIN# 124378N474652 in the database? on: January 15, 2007, 11:57:07 PM
No, it's not.
If you could send me a copy of the docs, I'll add it so we're on the lookout for it. Smiley
2843  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 master cylinder research question on: January 15, 2007, 11:20:08 PM
Looks Julian to me. Most m/cylinders are dated Julian from what I've seen.
Thanks!
Anyone else have a 67 drum brake car they can check?
2844  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / VIN list - Fencl Tufo hipo 69 Camaros on: January 15, 2007, 04:17:26 AM
This was posted on the old forum and I just realized it needs to be on the new one too. Smiley

Fencl Tufo Chevrolet was a hi-po Chicago area dealer. Some paperwork from the dealership still survives. This is not a complete list of F-T cars, just the 1969 Camaro hi-po models (SS350 minimum) that someone saved paperwork on. If you have a car that's on this list, I can put you in contact with a person who can help document your car.

9N506595
9N512611
9N517701
9N552191
9N552448
9N560973
9N571248
9N575570
9N584068
9N587837
9N591777
9N600737
9N602662
9N605302
9N605412
9N618920
9N629310
9N630169
9N630235
9N630943
9N631042
9N637271
9N637352
9N637428
9N637454
9N637471
9N637614
9N637681
9N637861
9N640401
9N641710
9N674579
9N675924
9N683089
9N683297
9N692368



2845  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New CRG Research Bulletin Available on the 69 Pacer/Z10 on: January 14, 2007, 04:10:05 PM
Actually, I have an update to the cooling article that's mostly done. It's the one that is the most in need of updating.

I'm working on brake and battery info and I've started redoing a couple sections of the site. Not enough hours in the day.... Smiley
2846  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 SS? (was 5y code) on: January 13, 2007, 02:01:19 AM
From the pics, it looks like an SS. Congrats!
2847  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z munice on: January 13, 2007, 01:32:17 AM
Nope, it's not in there.
Keep looking, hopefully you'll find my trans since my car came from there....!
2848  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New CRG Research Bulletin Available on the 69 Pacer/Z10 on: January 13, 2007, 01:25:44 AM
Thanks guys. It took a while to pull together, but it's nice to get some facts on those cars out there.

Now I just need to finish the seatbelt article!!
2849  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original calipers, '69 Z on: January 11, 2007, 02:37:47 AM
I've had both bad hoses and stuck calipers. Make sure you get good hoses. Arghhh, you have no idea how much agravation a bad quality new hose causes.... (the cheap new hose can make it appear that there's air in the system).
2850  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 rear axle codes on: January 11, 2007, 02:34:59 AM
It's the only axle code that's been observed and doesn't show up in *any* documentation.
It came out mid-year 67 and I can't see how it's different than the PA axle.
Pages: 1 ... 188 189 [190] 191 192 ... 212
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.