CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 07:35:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105865 Posts in 12354 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 183 184 [185] 186 187 ... 218
2761  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N624779 - Protect-O-Plate on: May 30, 2007, 12:50:13 AM
It was on ebay back in Jan 07, different seller.

Notice the shipping cost is $65!
2762  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / Re: 8L337201 Engine block on: May 28, 2007, 09:01:58 PM
I haven't run across that car yet. Rare block!
2763  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Rally wheels 1968 z28 on: May 28, 2007, 02:19:15 AM
Those wheels were produced beyond 75. It's a 1978 wheel.
2764  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 396 10 Bolt? on: May 26, 2007, 11:57:57 PM
No 67-69 396 car came with a 10 bolt.
2765  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 deluxe seat belts on: May 26, 2007, 11:56:10 PM
They should all match, so something has been changed.
2766  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: transmission with wrong stamp ? on: May 26, 2007, 11:26:54 PM
Both of those stampings were in a gang stamp holder.
I have pictures of hundreds of original trans code stamps; none look like that. And the wrong year is the clincher.
Sorry. Sad
2767  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Steel seat back panels on: May 22, 2007, 10:24:46 PM
67 only.
From http://www.camaros.org/TopicsofResearch.shtml#1967Topics:
Metal vs. plastic seat backs: Transition appears to occur during mid-April or possibly first week of May
2768  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Warranty Engines on: May 21, 2007, 03:53:27 PM
Probably because they only incremented the main gang stamp every 100 parts. The last 2 digits were then added by hand.
2769  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Z10 trim plate on: May 21, 2007, 03:49:35 PM
Thanks!
Is this car for sale somewhere or being discussed and I just haven't seen it?
2770  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp on: May 20, 2007, 12:35:10 AM
I'm looking in the CRG database. We have several 69 L35 cars that we have data on the the original carb. I also confirmed it via broadcast sheets.
2771  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Z10 trim plate on: May 20, 2007, 12:25:07 AM
Paul,
Do you have a VIN for that tag?

Thanks!
Kurt
2772  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp on: May 18, 2007, 01:56:13 AM
every book l've been reading is showing the 7049200 as the carb used for the 69 L34 325 hp. what publication are you getting the 7049204 from? thanks
I'm not. 204 is what is actually on original cars. Never seen a 200 on an original car.
2773  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Could be lots of Camaros, should I jump the fence? on: May 15, 2007, 11:19:41 PM
Just don't carry any tools.
2774  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: oil pressure line on: May 15, 2007, 11:17:17 PM
Let's see.
One of our test vehicles burnt to the ground with a copper line for a fuel pressure guage that work hardened and broke. The fire got hot enough that it melted the wheels off the car....

And I had a test vehicle that I was driving and the oil pressure line work hardened and broke. It poured out a lot of smoke, but I got lucky and it didn't catch fire and I didn't ruin the motor (special cam / lifter test vehicle no less).

A copper line is a bad idea.....
2775  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp on: May 15, 2007, 11:07:50 PM
Kurt I agree that is a possibility also thanks. whats the ff stand for?
Possibility? Which, the date or the carb #? The carb # is the correct one. I believe the L34 auto used the same carb, but I can't confirm it, yet.
The 7029200 is not the correct carb.
Pages: 1 ... 183 184 [185] 186 187 ... 218
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.