CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 12:13:29 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103796 Posts in 12188 Topics by 4701 Members
Latest Member: rts
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 213
16  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N665455 on: July 31, 2014, 12:55:32 AM
The short block was in OH. Haven't seen the car.
Any chance of getting a copy of the window sticker if he has it?
17  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N647308 - L72 COPO T0512MN on: July 31, 2014, 12:53:23 AM
Block was in UT last I knew. Not many COPO's sold there, so it probably migrated there.
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decoding a Pace on: July 31, 2014, 12:48:47 AM
The car was on ebay before.
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need Help Identifying GM Wood 2X Pantograph Model Part No.331707 on: July 28, 2014, 03:55:25 AM
Is that a Chevrolet part #? They were 7 digits, not 6.
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decoding a Pace on: July 28, 2014, 03:49:40 AM
Your car had the AC added to it when it lived in AZ. Sold new in CO.
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ stamp..opinions on: July 15, 2014, 08:57:48 PM
Hard to tell for sure with that pic, but pad looks original.
If you want better advice, get a better pic. Smiley
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 mag wheel covers N96 on: July 14, 2014, 10:26:04 AM
I don't know, but http://www.camaros.org/options.shtml#wcovers has pics of the different covers.
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: LOS/VNY 69 Z28 cowl paint on: July 13, 2014, 10:36:06 PM
No.
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ stamp..opinions on: July 11, 2014, 12:53:46 AM
Hard to tell for sure with that pic, but pad looks original.
It's a 12B car.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 07, 2014, 01:48:22 PM
Summation:
Austin started a thread about how he was told that his axle stamp wasn't typical.
Phil (festival) jumped in and just stirred things up. Clem posted too. Ed got frustrated and said he was done.
After Phil posts another attack, he then blamed me for not shutting down the thread.
I banned him. The whole thread was negativity, so I removed it.

Noone is happy to see Ed leave. But PM's are 100% about banning Phil.

Hope we can get back to the cars now.
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trim ring fit to rim on: July 07, 2014, 03:35:36 AM
I just looked at an original paint, original owner 69 Z. 05A NOR.
Fingers on all wheels, all parts are original and show only finger gouges on the wheel.
Very solid datapoint.
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Radiator Tank Codes 1969 on: July 07, 2014, 03:26:45 AM
SB - no idea.
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 06, 2014, 08:42:18 PM
No problem Austin.
The forum needed some edits to get the tone back to where it normally is. Smiley
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 06, 2014, 01:24:45 AM
I hope Ed takes a well-deserved break and comes back in a while.
He is a valuable asset on the forum.

Like I said "hoping we can all work together" but that is now me "stirring the pot" and words to get me banned.
You may have said that, but you also posted much more, dragging the axle discussion into a third thread.
The other forum members are clear that it wasn't appropriate.
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Earliest 3969341 and Latest 3894860 axles on: July 06, 2014, 12:07:23 AM
Austin,
The axle stamp does not appear to be like other typical stamps that we have seen due to spacing. I know a lot of the history of your car is known, but it is not a typical stamp.
To help reduce possible distortion of the data, it will not be included with the other data gathered until other stamp photos corroborate it as a production anomaly.
Thanks!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 213
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.326 seconds with 18 queries.