CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 02:20:06 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106487 Posts in 12420 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 220
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Timing of 69 z 28 302 on: November 11, 2014, 10:22:55 PM
See http://www.camaros.org/pdf/timing101.pdf and http://www.camaros.org/pdf/map_advance.pdf
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original battery hold down bolt on: November 11, 2014, 10:20:31 PM
I would agree these bolts all appear the same. 7/8" washer.
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1111480 4C30 Distributor on: November 11, 2014, 10:14:17 PM
Yes, they serviced the distributors for years. If you bought one in 79, it would be stamped correctly for 69. And guys did just that....
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Documented 1970 RS Z/28 National Press Camaro on: November 11, 2014, 10:10:56 PM
Special notes - yes, but not many about the destination. Mostly about the build configuration.

I see MI MFG plates all the time. Heck, I got one on my car.
20  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Site uploader full message on: November 10, 2014, 01:20:29 AM
Fixed. Thx!
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Chevrolet dealer location on: November 10, 2014, 01:14:41 AM
Thanks!
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Chevrolet dealer location on: November 09, 2014, 04:04:41 PM
Alan,
Dealers were organized (generally) alphabetically within the zone, not by location. So 114 could be anywhere in the zone.
113 was Carstens, 115 was Central.

What was the production date of your car?
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Have a lead on a 396 Z10 body no engine or trans. on: November 09, 2014, 03:56:53 PM
BB heater box, single fuel line, and the second owner that bought it in 1970 confirming it.

No tach.

Jerry won't have much to go on, but it should be enough to document it.
24  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 67 350 - VIN 7N127127, MS code, plus matching Muncie 4-sp on: November 09, 2014, 01:00:42 AM
Engine date is V0908MS. Had to use my x-ray vision to see thru the stuff piled on it. Smiley
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Documented 1970 RS Z/28 National Press Camaro on: November 09, 2014, 12:47:19 AM
Don't see too many CA Manufacturer license plates.

Car was on ebay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/181529908430
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Chevrolet dealer location on: November 09, 2014, 12:28:18 AM
Central in Fremont was 115. So it should be a Ce______ Chev.
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / MOVED: 69 RSSS paperwork on ebay on: November 09, 2014, 12:24:02 AM
This topic has been moved to 1969 - Orphans.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=12785.0
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Have a lead on a 396 Z10 body no engine or trans. on: November 09, 2014, 12:14:50 AM
I know of the car. And Elaine contacted me earlier this year about it.

I think it's an L78. Rare car. Find another L78 Z10. And doesn't look too bad. He had to buy the others to get the Z10. BB has been gone for years, had a 350.
I wouldn't touch a thing until I had Jerry verify the car and chased down prior owners.
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original battery hold down bolt on: November 08, 2014, 03:52:39 AM
I'm missing how which bolt affects the torque question.

btw, I was a D&R engineer. Smiley
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original battery hold down bolt on: November 07, 2014, 10:13:59 AM
Clamping force required, that's all. They worked out the force required for the battery and generated the spec. Sure don't want to have the battery loose or crack the case.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 220
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.12 seconds with 18 queries.