CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 31, 2015, 07:51:23 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111436 Posts in 12830 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 232
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: First Gen accelerator cable question on: March 30, 2015, 02:13:12 AM
L6 used cable.
About everything about used linkage.
After several issues with linkages binding, GM switched to cables.
Try an early 70's Nova V8 - similar design with a cable.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 PC code rear on: March 29, 2015, 11:20:14 PM
PC is a 12 bolt in 67.
10 bolt in 69, with multileaf springs.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67-9 Fuel lines on: March 28, 2015, 11:34:46 AM
Great angle that clearly shows the routing.
Those are the clips that I'm familiar with for 69 and but look different than Vince's.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67-69 Bumper Jack Design on: March 27, 2015, 10:19:55 PM
At least 3 different bases were used.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a 1969 Z/28? on: March 26, 2015, 11:50:54 AM
My Z has it written in the center of the rear bulkhead.
I looked for a long time, but not in the right place!
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Just became a member on: March 26, 2015, 11:48:35 AM
Everyone says you don't want 3.31 or 3.55 gears in a Z - too hard to launch. You never hear that with a LT1.
It performs about the same as the 302, but with more torque on the low-end.
In 1970, the Trans-Am series allowed for destroking motors. So Chevrolet went with the LT1 in production and TA teams destroked it back to a 302 for the track.

If you want originality, it needs a 302. If you want a driver and more torque across the spectrum, then a stroked 302. Y'all remember the Z29 feature car?

Obviously, this is heresy to some. Smiley
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: just joined have a 68 coupe and a 69 rs convt on: March 25, 2015, 09:42:21 PM
Coupe or convertible: http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Just became a member on: March 25, 2015, 09:27:02 PM
I wouldn't put a 302 in anything by choice. Realize several of the TA teams reputedly cheated and ran stroked 302's (aka LT1 350's).
The *only* reason Chevrolet made the 302 is because of TA rules. When the rules allowed it, Chevy went to the LT1.
A little balancing and you'll have more power and same rpm....
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a 1969 Z/28? on: March 25, 2015, 09:03:16 AM
If you do go the original route, I'd note William's advise and not sweat the details. 15x7 rally's are cheap, correct AD's are not. Etc.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a 1969 Z/28? on: March 24, 2015, 12:30:20 PM
I think it's a Z, but with the axle being replaced too (Nov axle in a Sept car), proof is minimal. Sad
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 SS 396 / 375 assistance on: March 24, 2015, 12:28:18 PM
Bill, I was wondering if you would notice. Smiley 

Actually, most 4.10's went into Z28's. L78's got more of a range of axles - 3.55 to 4.10.
I'll be more specific: Most of the BV axles were much closer, but I see another Feb LOS car with that same date.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: TRICO Wiper Blade Design Changeover in 1969 on: March 24, 2015, 07:49:53 AM
05C NOR - peaked
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 SS 396 / 375 assistance on: March 23, 2015, 03:05:03 PM
An early Dec axle in a late Feb car is possible. Most of the axles were much closer, but I see another Feb LOS car with that same date.

When does NCRS say the car was built?
Single fuel line? BB frame mounts and heater core?
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: just joined have a 68 coupe and a 69 rs convt on: March 22, 2015, 11:22:23 PM
I generated those color % numbers. They are here: http://www.camaros.org/exterior.shtml#ColorPercentages

Sounds like a nice car. Did I see the car recently for sale? It looks familar.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 SS 396 / 375 assistance on: March 22, 2015, 11:17:57 PM
Sorry, nothing on that VIN. Close, but that doesn't count.
What's the axle stamp?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 232
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.304 seconds with 18 queries.