CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 17, 2014, 02:42:46 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104471 Posts in 12233 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 214
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 15, 2014, 08:01:45 PM
I don't think so. There weren't any strikes then and the monthly totals are consistent.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 14, 2014, 10:43:18 PM
I'm little confused by the data, mostly the date from the NCRS.
Yes, the month looks a little wonky. April ran long and 05C seems to be earlier in the month.
Fisher dates were for them and someday-weeks they cared more than others....
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 14, 2014, 10:14:41 AM
There is a problem with may & june production number # because may numbers show twice as many build as any other month on Norwood cars. Have a 06a car with that starts with 449---. Have a one owner 06b car that starts with 453---.
Well, there's asterisks next to the data and this statement is in bold on the page: "The data for some months (especially May and June 68 at Norwood) deviate significantly from actual build dates,....."
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: May 1968 trim tag irregularities on: September 11, 2014, 10:33:49 PM
That doesn't looks right. Maybe 5/16?
A car right after yours has a 0509 axle.
What's your axle date?
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 X77 garage/barn find on: September 11, 2014, 10:22:49 PM
Regulator very probably will work fine. They last.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Deltronic Transistor-Controlled Magnetic Pulse amp. plate 3916730 on: September 11, 2014, 10:13:31 PM
You looked here? http://www.camaros.org/trans_ign.shtml
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: delco-remy starters on: September 11, 2014, 10:12:06 PM
That's a 68 MY-built starter so it's not original to your car.
1108361 - don't know of any Camaro usage til 69.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 10:25:30 PM
I know of a couple of cars that were attempted to order with the MA6. Orders were held up and finally built without.
Corvettes did get it.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 10:39:53 PM
Production totals for the blocks are zero. Car totals are zero too.
Was the JU block in a car or a service block?

I recall seeing one MA6 block that was apparently built and then reworked by the engine plant and sold as a service block.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: First Camaro delivered to Yenko going to auction on: September 09, 2014, 01:31:45 PM
He is referring to the 68 in the link he posted.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 09:52:38 AM
From http://www.camaros.org/drivetrain.shtml#PadStamps

Engine Codes Reserved for Use With MA6 Heavy-Duty Clutch
 (none known to have been produced):
 L48 - HP,  L35 - JU,  L34 - KA,  L78 - KC,  L89 - KE
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: X55 and M35? on: September 08, 2014, 06:44:36 PM
http://www.camaros.org/trans.shtml#Powerglide
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro seat belts on: September 08, 2014, 06:43:19 PM
It had three originally.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 08, 2014, 08:13:03 AM
It would be an interesting block, seeing there are no engine codes in 68 for a HD clutch.
And in 69, no cars were built.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Shat R Proof Front windshield with no DOT? on: September 06, 2014, 04:09:16 PM
We helicoptered parts from our plant to the assembly plant. Still cheaper than shutting them down....
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 214
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.387 seconds with 18 queries.