CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 20, 2014, 05:56:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105569 Posts in 12328 Topics by 4751 Members
Latest Member: Blakep54
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Battery Hold Down Clamp on: May 14, 2012, 08:36:09 PM
I have the original on my 69 Z/28 that I painted and also have the original  one on my 69 "survivor" SS nova that has the rubber based paint on it. I bet they were dipped some how to help with the battery acid.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 camaro endura bumper jack on: May 12, 2012, 11:52:52 AM
Thanks Joe.  Sam
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 camaro endura bumper jack on: May 11, 2012, 09:35:02 PM
Other than the VE3 load rest is any other part of the jack painted blue?  Thanks!
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Z/28 firewall crayon marks on: April 14, 2012, 10:45:20 PM
I have an 11D Z/28 and my bulkhead reads DG3. I have a dark green interior and an X33 car.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Z-28 CRANK on: February 02, 2012, 07:11:27 PM
a steel 283 crank will also work.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 ORIGINAL Z-28 CAMARO ''ENGINE FRAME MOUNTS'' WITH ""DZ'' 302 on: February 02, 2012, 07:06:44 PM
I believe the 69 Z/28 frame mounts should have 507 and 508 as a part number on them.
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original finish on a fan spacer on: December 04, 2011, 09:19:23 PM
I believe natural finish.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Anybody coming to Chicago that can help verify my car on: November 14, 2011, 05:44:03 PM
not sure it is worth all your time, money and effort. Its pretty bad in my opinion but?HuhHuh
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Old pictures of the 1969 Z/28 I owned in the late '70's on: November 01, 2011, 03:37:41 PM
hey Steve I love those pictures. I bet it was even more exciting buying them back the second time as it was the first. Good deal!  Sammy
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Muscle Car and Corvette Nationals Show Nov 19 & 20 in Chicago on: September 21, 2011, 09:50:02 PM
greatest show on earth. we will be there!
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Junior Stock site great memories eh on: September 14, 2011, 05:25:27 PM
that is a great Site Ted. Thanks!! Made my day.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 pcv valve and factory 90degree angle hose on: September 04, 2011, 06:10:22 AM
They have come down in price, especially the BB ones.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Gasoline Additives on: September 04, 2011, 06:05:14 AM
I used to run a lead additive with 93 octane but now I just go and buy Sunoco 112. Don't like the ethenol in the gas today. The 112 makes the plugs more readable and the car seems to start and run a little better with the 112. Expensive but I don'r drive the car real far but drive it weekly, maybe even twice a week in nice weather.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 pcv valve and factory 90degree angle hose on: August 30, 2011, 07:58:59 PM
purple tint started in 1970 I believe. Also the assembly line versions really don't look like the NOS or over the counter pcv valve either.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Engine value to 1968 Z28 owner on: August 01, 2011, 09:33:29 PM
I agree with you Mopar. $12,000 is steep even for the orignal car. If I needed a DZ 302 for my car, and it was not original to my car why would I pay 12,000 for the wrong motor? No matter what, it still would be the wrong motor for my car. Maybe $5,000 complete if all matching for the original car the motor was from. I don't understand why the owner that did the resto di not want the motor and original parts back. I guess it was a trade off for a stronger running 350 and some newer, upgraded parts?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.