CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 03:07:39 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105618 Posts in 12334 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 130 131 [132] 133 134 ... 145
1966  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: How Much Do You Drive? on: August 26, 2006, 04:15:44 PM
Thought I'd bring this one back and see if anyone else wants to chime in.
Down my way, we've had beautiful weather, but cannot seem to find the time to get out and cruise.

Let's hear from you.  Vote!
1967  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: need help deciding how to restore engine compartment on: August 23, 2006, 06:05:42 PM
Before you start take a look at this thread:
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=143.0
Especially heed JohnZ's comment in the second post:
"See the "First-Generation Camaro Assembly Process" paper in the "CRG Reports" block at the top of the page for more Paint Shop process detail."
If you are going to do rattlecan, this could save you later headaches...
1968  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: To stripe or not to stripe? That is the question on: August 23, 2006, 05:56:59 PM
As I read the 68 AIM both the early and the later stripe were available for non SS.  The notation in the AIM for both is for 12000 series and lists no limitations.  For that matter, the 68 AIM has the same notation for the pin stripe, which was definitely available for non SS.
1969  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Finding the Correct Underhood Lamp on: August 22, 2006, 08:01:16 PM
Or maybe a 68 and 69. The 68 AIM speaks of existing holes and appears to show two holes (two lines showing screw placement, but interestingly enough only one screw actually drawn).  Roll Eyes
1970  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Found another one : ) ...'67 with just under 40,000 miles! on: August 22, 2006, 05:09:04 PM
Kevin,

From previous experiences I fear CNORTON may be right.  Any state's DMV reports can dead end fast even for someone with "authority" (dealer, attourney, etc.)
But since that lady owned it so long, you could get lucky.
Here's a place online to start: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/brochures/fast_facts/ffdmv04.htm
This could start you out with a $5 fee or a $5 phone call, but if you're willing to give it a shot...
Good luck!

Post the pictures and let us know what happens.
1971  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct Gas Cap on: August 20, 2006, 11:46:11 AM
Mark,

The reason I ask is twofold:

You ought to take a look at this: http://home.pcmagic.net/bertfam/camaro.htm
and contact Bertfam (Ed). 

Also, some suppliers advertise  SS caps that really aren't the right one for a particular year. (Like the SS 350 cap that is often advertized for 67 - 68, but then they will disclaim it as original in the fine print for 68.)  That RS cap may have been put on your car from "bad" information.  It happens all the time and sometimes from what you might think is a reliable source.

Sounds like a sweet car... post us a picture!  Grin

Phillip
1972  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct Gas Cap on: August 19, 2006, 04:44:58 PM
What size was the original motor?  Is it the 396 you list?
1973  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 z/28 what to with it? on: August 17, 2006, 02:14:44 PM
http://www.camaros.org/engine.shtml#EngineMounting
1974  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cooling fan and clutch question? on: August 17, 2006, 01:26:09 PM
First, take a look at this:
http://www.camaros.org/coolingsystems.shtml
I realize this only addresses part of your question...
I think Kurt can help you with the rest.  He straightened me out on the 3 vs 3.25 spacing a while back.

I went back and found that thread.  Take a look:
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=482.msg2790#msg2790
1975  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: August 16, 2006, 04:06:41 PM
First, I don't want to turn this thread too far away from its original question...
But several months ago, I tried to start a thread on judging and got little response...
they did not learn to judge the cars correctly.
Actually, I agree with that criticism of AACA.  But I think the real issue is around the word "correctly".  What is correct depends on the organization doing the judging and where they set their standards.  Presently, a 1st Generation Camaro would be judged in one of two classifications according to year and would be judged against practically everything else manufactured that year by anybody (except Mustangs)... and only factory documentation would be considered, not your pictures, etc.  I have seen Camaros win in their classification, however, both locally and nationally in recent years.  The point is that those owners know what is "correct" in that organizatiions judging standards.
I've figured from JohnZ and others comments that there isn't a very clear set of JUDGING standards for Camaros.  Wouldn't it be great if there were? Huh Huh Huh  I wonder if CRG isn't a good place to start!!!
1976  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: August 16, 2006, 08:57:05 AM
FYI, in 1987 AACA developed an entire juding (and awards) classification called Historical Preservation of Original Features (HPOF), which is to preserve all brands and models.
From the 2006 Juges Manual: "In the furtherance of the “preservation” mission, the
AACA Board of Directors in 1987 established a program to encourage the saving and display of collector vehicles in their original, as-manufactured condition."
1977  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2009 Camaro is Coming!!! on: August 16, 2006, 08:35:37 AM
Jimmy V,

Probabaly your file is too large.  Take it down to 65 x 65 pixels and it should work.  BTW, many car pictures are wider than they are tall.  So, it may have to be smaller than 65 X 65 to work (look right).  For example, mine turned out 63 X 47 --for it to look like I wanted.

Good luck!
1978  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2009 Camaro is Coming!!! on: August 15, 2006, 01:48:57 PM
Does anybody know what kind of market research GM did?  What market are they after?
1979  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2009 Camaro is Coming!!! on: August 14, 2006, 10:42:34 AM
As Yogi Berra said "It's deja vu all over again!"
1980  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 z/28 what to with it? on: August 13, 2006, 11:41:24 AM
Don't clone it!
Hotrod is right.  The fact that it is a Z is major.
Even thought it is a Chevelle 396 motor, 396 motors were also very desirable.
You got the best of all worlds there. 
The value of any Camaro is going up!
Pages: 1 ... 130 131 [132] 133 134 ... 145
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.123 seconds with 18 queries.