CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 27, 2014, 10:12:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103591 Posts in 12177 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 127 128 [129] 130 131 ... 143
1921  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear Axle Stamp on: September 02, 2006, 08:29:07 PM
Dave,

My motor and transmission isn't original, and I have the exact same problem with the linkage.  The powerglide linkage runs right across where the numbers are.  When we had it up on the rack last Feb., I asked my favorite mechanic about looking under the linkage for the numbers.  He said, "Are you really sure you want to do that?!?"  And gave me a look that would cut steel.  I don't suppose the fact that we had worked for two hours setting the passing gear, etc. had much to do with it.  Roll Eyes

If you are brave enough to pull it off for a look, let me know how it goes!

BTW, headed for my favorite show, swap, etc. in September.  Wish me luck!

Phillip
1922  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 Radio on: September 02, 2006, 08:15:59 PM
That's perfect! Thanks, Ed.  Grin
Thanks guys.  Grin
In case you haven't figured it out. I'm proving a point to a friend.  We've been arguing numbers and descriptions for days, but a picture is worth a thousand words!  Grin
1923  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 Radio on: September 02, 2006, 07:00:47 PM
No, installed is fine.  Thanks.
If either one of you (or anyone else) could post a picture that is more close up that would help.
I really appreciate it!
1924  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 68 Radio on: September 02, 2006, 09:21:32 AM
Does anyone have a good picture of an original 68 U63 or U69 (AM or AM/FM) radio?
Would appreciate the help!
1925  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Radiator Support Assembly on: September 01, 2006, 03:45:06 PM
How about that!  I was born a Blue Comet (Asheboro), but haven't lived there in years.  I'm in the Winston area now.  Have you ever been involved with any of the car shows they have in Asheboro?  There was a big AACA show there last year.
1926  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Charlotte Autofair on: September 01, 2006, 03:38:04 PM
I just show my car in the AACA show.  Some of my friends are Hornet's Nest officers, but I still have to work for a living and those positions are all filled by retired guys.  I have judged a bit, but again that takes time.

You're right about the track.  It's quite a site.  And you could get lost for three days just looking at all the vendor stuff.
1927  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 Battery Question on: August 31, 2006, 08:50:22 PM
Thanks, William!  I want to put an original style battery in my 68 with AC.  That helps.
1928  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 68 Battery Question on: August 31, 2006, 08:03:35 PM
In 68 (or any year) was the T60 Heavy Duty Battery tied to any other option (like AC or BB. etc.)?  Or was it just a cold weather start option?
1929  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Charlotte Autofair on: August 31, 2006, 07:33:00 PM
Take a look:
http://www.charlotte-autofair.com/
In April there were lots of 1 Generation Camaros for sale --in varying states of condition...
Come see me on Saturday in the AACA show.  Grin
1930  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Radiator Support Assembly on: August 31, 2006, 07:21:55 PM
Whoops, sorry Mark! Missed your other question.
Take a look at this:
http://www.camaros.org/engine.shtml#CamaroEngines
If you don't count COPO (the 427s, like the COPO 9560 =BB SS in sheep's clothing), all the big blocks were ordered as SS options.
1931  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Radiator Support Assembly on: August 31, 2006, 01:19:24 PM
I agree with William: At least on the early 68 there was one radiator support assembly (P&A 1.270), PN 3914733.  I could not find anything particular in the 68 AIM either.
1932  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: a few pics of the '67... on: August 29, 2006, 06:06:49 PM
The CA DMV web site never actually refers to a "title search".
But this seems like a likely place to start from their site:

Who To Contact

Driver License (DL)/Identification (ID) Card or Vehicle Registration
Submit your request on the appropriate form. Forms available online are identified by  For the following forms (up to 15 copies each), call (916) 657-8098 or write DMV Information Release Unit, M/S G199, P.O. Box 944247, Sacramento, CA 94244-2470. For large quantities of forms, write to: DMV Materials Management Unit, 4201 Sierra Point Drive, #112, Sacramento, CA 95834-1998.
1933  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 camaro A/C Fan Shroud on: August 29, 2006, 05:57:52 PM
http://www.camaros.org/coolingsystems.shtml
Look at the Shroud chart.  In V-8 looks more like SB vs BB.
1934  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Great reference site with reviews on auto shippers... on: August 29, 2006, 04:56:14 PM
Good point.  And once you mentioned it, I realized that the car could still be covered under a regular policy (like when it is being trailered).
1935  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Great reference site with reviews on auto shippers... on: August 29, 2006, 01:44:05 PM
I've also found that Classic Car dealers (whom you know and trust) can be helpful, since they often ship cars or refer others.

Kevin, did you insure your car in shipping?  If so, what was the rate?
Pages: 1 ... 127 128 [129] 130 131 ... 143
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.313 seconds with 18 queries.