CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2014, 06:11:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106594 Posts in 12427 Topics by 4790 Members
Latest Member: gmein
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 126 127 [128] 129 130 ... 146
1906  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Vinyl or Not? on: October 05, 2006, 08:23:22 PM
What do you think?
1907  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: How Much Do You Drive? on: October 05, 2006, 08:20:25 PM
OK, poll closed down for now...
1908  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Fan and orientation? on: October 05, 2006, 08:14:39 PM
Just looked at the "finished product" in your other posting.  LOOKS GREAT!
If you are not worried about the originality issue for shows, the 7 blade fan certainly is a good idea.
Isn't Skaneateles about in the middle of NY state? How long before the lake effect snows force you off the road?
1909  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Fan and orientation? on: October 04, 2006, 08:59:04 PM
Things are fine in W-S.  I drove my 68 200 miles last weekend.
OK, my A/C question was off the wall for a L78, but my confusion was around the number of blades I was coming up with from your picture.  So your fan is 7 blade.  I did not know that was a 68 option.  Kurt's article (mentioned above) refers to 7 blade for 69.  Am I missing something here?
1910  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Fan and orientation? on: October 04, 2006, 01:22:35 PM
Mark,
When you say "heavy duty" do you mean 4 core rows?  And does your car have factory A/C?
1911  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Air cleaner BASE has 'holes' in it ...original??? on: October 03, 2006, 07:03:16 PM
Kevin,

Back in the early 60s there were guys (not exactly rocket scientists) who would drill holes to allow more air in (That's why I asked about the filter relationship).  Granted, it was probably the wrong approach to a good idea by guys who owned a drill but didn't have the money to buy a new breather.
1912  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 750 CFM Edlebrock on: October 02, 2006, 07:19:36 PM
Well... I've always read that you really don't need more than 650 CFM on any small block unless you plan on racing it... However, the 600 you already have is just fine for the street.
I agree with Ed.
But let me also say:
What are your goals for your 68?
If it is a driver, Ed is certainly right.  Too big justs costs money.
If it is to show and originality counts, you've already done too much.
If you want someone to look under the hood and say, "Looks sweet!", then the bigger the better and do it in chrome.
1913  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: **BEWARE** ebay scammers hitting it hard today !!!!!!! on: October 01, 2006, 12:31:29 PM
Thanks for the heads up...

When you find such things you should report it, IMMEDIATELY!  Shocked  Shocked  Shocked

http://pages.ebay.com/securitycenter/index.html

Since we're always using such sites, we can be a "Community Watch".
1914  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cast Iron Transmission on: September 28, 2006, 12:56:38 PM
Look on pages 280 and following of Colvins, BY THE NUMBERS, 65-69, when you do find the numbers. Ed is right.  It should be a cast iron Saginaw in a 327/275.  But the numbers you gave aren't...
1915  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Air cleaner BASE has 'holes' in it ...original??? on: September 27, 2006, 08:27:26 PM
Where are these holes in relation to the air filter?  Around the outer edge of the base where the air would flow through the filter?
1916  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stupid question of the day on: September 26, 2006, 09:32:03 AM
Actually, "modifying" was a popular past time in the 60s and 70s.  In fact, lots of us who are restoring in the 00s got our start modifying back then.  Reasons: the Z label was popular, hideaway headlights were cool, and the Y chromosome (make that the Why-not chromosome).
1917  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Sealer between blower motor and housing ??? on: September 25, 2006, 05:13:37 PM
The only sealer that the 68 Chassis Service Manual mentions is in the blower assembly replacement and repair.  If you haven't already looked, take a look at figure 4 on 1A-3.
1918  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: How Much Do You Drive? on: September 24, 2006, 07:20:37 AM
Well, finally got up to 50 votes...

Gonna shut this down soon...

Thanks to those who voted and posted...

If you haven't, please do!
1919  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Best way to preserve the build sheet? on: September 22, 2006, 12:32:35 PM
Yes, have it laminated, but before you do take a digital picture of it.
1920  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Under hood weather stripping and decals on: September 21, 2006, 04:44:08 PM
I'd love to know if GM found a problem in the 67 that made them put the seal on the 68...
I figure the "stickum" on the 68 seal probably didn't last till you got home being exposed to motor heat, so the clips in 69 make sense.
And after John's explanation, I think I'll try to find the seal and clips and put them on my 68 original or not.  My car doesn't overheat with the A/C running, but I can tell it doesn't get real happy about it in July.
Pages: 1 ... 126 127 [128] 129 130 ... 146
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.