CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 28, 2014, 01:36:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102437 Posts in 12088 Topics by 4667 Members
Latest Member: hrascoll
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 124379N561026 in database?? on: January 19, 2008, 02:14:19 PM
just looked at 69 Z for sale...any info on car?? Im suspicious...Thanks
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 14, 2008, 11:56:33 AM
well thanks John...

A dont think my trunk  looks original at al...so now what??  it definitely looks like the original rear pan...does anyone know if the SS emblem uses the same holes?? I swore they are diferent...

Im going to go visit the prior owner from the mid 80's this week...maybe he can help...I just have to find my original block...and then I'll have my proof positive!!!

Did 69 Z-28's come with M-20's  ?? Is it rare??  thanks alot!!!
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 13, 2008, 09:48:14 PM
this one seems to show the speckle paint on the tailite housing...  sure looks original to me...
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 13, 2008, 09:46:43 PM
another over a bit further
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 13, 2008, 09:45:55 PM
heres the reara panel inside the trunk...does this not look like original trunk spatter paint and primer on th etailite and rear panel?? Are the Z 28 emblem holes unique on the rear panel??

these holes for the emblem sure look original...and the rear panel looks original also...


what do you guys think?? anyone got pics of original speckle paint in the trunk and tailight area??

thanks
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 13, 2008, 09:42:45 PM
pic of cowl tag....it looks shiny because it is wet with oil because I seemed to have lost a cap on the valve cover... oops

37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 13, 2008, 09:41:27 PM
well, I got the trans back in and got the old Z fired up today...it was nice to feel her going through the gears again...

anyway, i took some more pics.. 

Am I correct to say the car has a M-20? and does that narrow down the possibilities as to the car's originality??

heres a pic of te trans...apparently i have a newer shifter...
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67/68 z28 cowl plenum on: January 12, 2008, 06:28:20 PM
i have a cowl plenum unit that i purchasd and it had what looks like possibly a K and n type filter...the material under the mesh is purple color...I know that Ive seen them on cars with I believe a brushed alum?? lid...I dont see any type of numbers on the filter...but, it seems to fit well...Ill try and post a pic if i can
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:10:00 PM
and the front stamp......

....they both are on the passenger side of the car facing the same direction...
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:08:48 PM
a bit closer..the rear stamp...
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:07:55 PM
more info on the trans...the trans has 2 grooves on the input shaft...   Huh   which i assume means it is an M-20......which is probably not great news...I assume I could have known for sure what the car was originally if it were an M-22 with no grooves...or an M-21 with 1 groove...correct me if I am wrong please...so being an m-20...does that narrow it down any?? does that eliminate the car being an original Z???

heres some pics a few have requested ..for location sake
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:02:58 PM
last of the clips..they all seem the same...
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:02:03 PM
heres another of fuel line
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 12, 2008, 03:01:25 PM
well...took some more pics today and I put the trans back in..i put a stock Gm bell back in and a new clutch, as the car had a shield..and the clutch eas pretty bad shape...Im just waiting to put the springs back on the clutch fork...Im not sure how they go as my brother took the springs off...so i will probably take some pics of the cpwl tag,etc. tomorrow...

anyway...heres the fuel line pics...sure looks like original single fuel lines...the car apparentlay has been undercoated years ago??  or is that just alot of roas crud that is peeling off in spots...wharever it is, it has saved this car from rotting out totally!!! also maybe because it was a california car??


here goes the pics...
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 LA Z..Real..or??? have #'s and pics... on: January 10, 2008, 06:02:53 AM
ok...so now what??   wrong rear??

...do the LA Z 28s have the 3/8 fuel line ?? 

this car has a single fuel line...I know things could have been changed years ago...but are the little clamps different that hold the dual fuel lines?? these sure look original...and I dont see how the dual fuel line could attach with what I have...or are the dual fuel lines attached to each other??

How about the tach?? Is there a way to tell if it had an original tach?? an extra wire or hole that goes through the firewall maybe??

thanks....
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.