CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 05:41:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106547 Posts in 12423 Topics by 4788 Members
Latest Member: capt68
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 18
211  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original #s matching SS muncie 3 speed on: July 23, 2008, 07:08:03 PM
Yes. The stick is flat with muncie stamped on it.

My muncie 3 speed (behind a L48) works great. Real pleasure to drive. Dont want to beat on it too much though, parts are hard to come by.  I think they came standard behind 396 as well.

4 speed would be a little "cooler" though.

John.
212  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: thinking about a modern 302 on: May 26, 2008, 09:42:56 AM
Eagle makes a 3" forged crank!

John
213  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / US made repro fenders on: March 25, 2008, 05:11:49 PM
Anyone have any experience using the US made reproduction fenders (or any US repro) that Heartbeat City is selling for $750? Are they as good as GM? Are they better than the imports? Thanks.

John
214  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z28 master cylinder??? on: March 01, 2008, 05:46:49 PM
I bought a reman master for my 69 SS for about $20 or $30 with the intention of using the new parts in my original. I ended up just using the reman master on my car, keeping my original on the shelf for a later rebuild, and paying the core charge. I bought a Wagner rebuild kit in the begining and found it didnt have all the parts I needed.

John
215  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Can anyone think of a GM delay wiper switch NOT on the steering column? on: February 29, 2008, 01:06:33 PM
Second gen Camaros (79 and later for sure) use a dash mounted delay wiper switch.
216  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 388 block casting date vs build date on: December 11, 2007, 02:43:28 PM
The numbers appear as: Casting date I 28 8, Assembly T02I2HN, VIN 192065800. Heads and intake both cast B 4 9.

John
217  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 388 block casting date vs build date on: November 19, 2007, 10:38:20 PM
Unfortunately, I left the car with its trim tag at the junk yard. I only took the complete engine. I could go back and see if it is still there, I'm always looking for reasons to go to the junk yard.
I'll try to get some pics of the engine pad out asap. Thanks for the interest.

John
218  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: GF432 on: November 14, 2007, 07:00:43 PM
I bought a GF432 from an AC Delco supplier a few tears ago. Its the fatter version (396) but its new and it works well. I agree, very hard to find. Check the AC Delco online catalog for GF432 or 5651480 or ask a local AC Delco supplier. Those are the numbers that are on the box.

John
219  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 69 388 block casting date vs build date on: November 13, 2007, 11:17:28 PM
I recently found a complete 350 300 hp engine in a junked 69 full size station wagon, original to the car. The interesting thing I found is the 388 block was cast in September of 1968 but the engine was assembled in February of 1969. Seems like a long time difference to me. Unfortunately, the block is cracked so I'm wondering if its worth documenting before I throw it away.

John
220  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 A/C heater box problem on: August 19, 2007, 09:13:56 AM
Thanks Flowjoe, I think I successfully made the piece that was missing out of sheet metal. I also sealed the rest of the duct work with some nice black high density foam tape I found at Lowes. Now the system blows lots of air out of the right places.

John
221  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 69 A/C heater box problem on: July 29, 2007, 10:11:07 AM
I'm currently working on resealing the HVAC ducts and heater box on a A/C equipped 69 RS. I have the box removed and on the firewall side of the heater box it looks like I'm missing a piece. I think I'm going to try to make the piece thats missing (for functionality) but I'd like to get an idea of what it looks like. I think its a small curved backing plate for the heater and defrost feed with 2 studs that go through the firewall. Does anyone have any pictures of the firewall side of a 69 A/C heater(under dash) box? That would be so helpful. Thanks.

John
222  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New Camaro in Detroit on: July 04, 2007, 10:09:19 PM
The new Mustang is a head turner for me. Ford did a great job with it but, what are they going to do with it when its due for redesign? I guess its all about what sells RIGHT NOW.
I am a fan of the new Camaro style, though I would prefer a little more retro. I too am hoping for a bare bones performance version and a Rally Sport (hidden headlight) option would do it for me.

John
223  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Where to find RPO codes? on: July 02, 2007, 12:06:02 AM
Wow, a friend of mine has a car with the same paint and interior codes, built 01A. It also is a 307 PG. The car is red now though.

John
224  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 CAMARO 4 PISTON CALIPERS on: June 25, 2007, 09:59:20 PM
Has anyone had any experience with the NEW 4 piston calipers some places are offering for the 67s and 68s? I am thinking of converting my 68 and I like the OE look.

John
225  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 firewall on: June 07, 2007, 05:58:20 PM
My 68 327/PG has the cover plate with 2 screws.

John
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 18
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 18 queries.