CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 26, 2014, 09:05:41 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106607 Posts in 12428 Topics by 4790 Members
Latest Member: gmein
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29]
421  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 z/28 what to with it? on: September 01, 2006, 06:58:49 AM
I allways wanted to find a real Z without a motor so I could put a 502 in it and put those emblems in place of the 302 emblems Grin
422  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z28 Question on: September 01, 2006, 06:52:03 AM
if you want a real Z and you are going to invest a lot of money because you want a z then try to buy a matching number car,you cant lose and most likely will be happy with the real 302 motor in a car that you spent a lot of money on.Get a book on Z28s that will tell you what to look for.One such book is written by Jerry MacNeish and will give you all the info you will need.the number is 410-781-0418 to order the definitve 1969 camaro fact book.Good luck and happy hunting!
423  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: selling my 68 #s matching ss rs 396 4 speed ? on: August 10, 2006, 03:34:00 PM
well this is a good place but if you want exposure ebay is the place,set a reserve and let em bid on it.by the way how much are you asking?lmk thanks Ron.
424  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: what year is ur camaro?? on: February 23, 2006, 02:23:14 PM
Gee, I have a 69RS Z/28, A 68 Z/28, 02 SS Z/28 perf edition GMMG car # 11, and looking for a 67Z28.
425  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Camaro How many left. on: December 30, 2005, 07:12:10 PM
here is another funny response,but in reality its something that all of us that own 69 camaros should be concerned about. there will soon be more 69 convertables out there than gm made with the repop convertable bodys that are being reproduced and soon they will be selling the coupes. well its a topic that has me wondering will it make our real 69 camaros worth more or less? something to ponder now that they are repoping phonie camaro bodys now.maybe we should get a number of real 69 camaros before the fake ones or clones take over Grin
426  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2002 35th anniversary camaro on: December 30, 2005, 07:00:16 PM
Kevin is correct,its a decal and can be bought at the dealer.maybe your car was repainted or the hood replaced for some reason but i doubt that slp forgot to put a decal on.on another note are you sure its a real 35th ss anniversary? look at the option decal on the drivers door and make sure it has the Z4C option code!!!  Grin
427  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Catalytic converters on 69' Camaro ! on: December 18, 2005, 02:36:52 PM
did you try to lean out the carburator as much as possible?also make sure you use a hot spark plug so all the fuel gets burned.if your heads are in good condition (no bad valve seats) you should be able to reduce the bad emissions.you can also try a high energy ignition system but that would cost some $$ and include a distributor swap.I would try the high energy ignition before modifying my exhaust. Smiley
428  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Why are 69s worth more than 67s on: December 18, 2005, 07:48:16 AM
ouch! Wink actually I like em all.but im partial towards the Z28s.especially the first three years.
429  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Why are 69s worth more than 67s on: December 17, 2005, 09:04:15 AM
69  hmm? 69 seems like a number everyone likes Shocked and if you cant figure that one out WOW MAN ARE YOU SQUARE MAN. hehehehe Cheesy
430  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: casting numbers on: November 17, 2005, 05:34:16 PM
This question may have been answered before. What is the reason for having different casting numbers for the same size engine in the same year? Different casting factories, different metal values, different applications? Huh
well as for the big block 396 engines there were hi perf 4 bolt main engines and 2 bolt main engines that had different casting numbers,as for the small block engines im not sure if the 350 ci 2bbl carb had a different number than the 4 bbl carb engine.there were so many different engine options back then it would be hard not to say that maybe a 307,327,350,or a 396 and a 427 might have 4 different casting numbers each for many reasons.maybe someone here might have this info.good question though and im sure it will be duscussed further.

dab67
431  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Was the 1967 camaro a disappointment? on: November 14, 2005, 02:54:11 PM
Im curious how many ford advertisments are in that car and driver issue that trashed the 67 camaro compared to chevy advertisments.did you ever watch motorweek? boy they are so biased towards imports and trash domestic cars.they really favor the jap cars and their commercials are nissian commercials.just my 2 cents.
432  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Members from old forum version please post here on: November 07, 2005, 07:49:58 AM
Hi,im from the old forum,been a member for years, my username was 69rsz and still is 69rsz.thanks RonC edison nj.
433  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Old Reliable 1969 Z28 & Vegas Race Trip on: November 06, 2005, 03:21:13 PM
Hi Jerry,congrates on your class win! just wanted to say happy holidays to ya.that sounds like it was a long trip you had,I will bet your glad to be back home.maybe talk to ya soon.Ron Edison nj.
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.