CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 30, 2014, 08:23:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102496 Posts in 12091 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58
841  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did my 69 Z have manual or power steering??? on: February 14, 2010, 02:25:22 PM
Yes that is what I understand. So what I need to find out is "What size are the drag links" I haven't seen a size number anywhere to check mine against anything.

Gary
842  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Did my 69 Z have manual or power steering??? on: February 13, 2010, 07:59:19 PM
I was just reading the info about the manual and power steering on the 69 Camaro and since I am not the original owner of my 69 Z28 and there are no documents (so far anyway) to check against and my car does have power steering, I was wondering what size the drag links are so I can verify. I don't have a caliper to check diameter, so I was just going to use the adjustable wrench method with my machinest ruler. Does anyone have this info?

Also what would I need to find if I had the RPO N44? Good to know I suppose to find out if I have that RPO or not.

Gary

843  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Brake booster question. on: February 09, 2010, 10:59:26 PM
Thanks Kurt. What date booster would I need for my 69Z that was actually built first week in June 06A. At least that is when I believe mine was built based on my research here and T.C. I might try my luck over at Team Chevelle and see if someone has a 9204 to trade.


Gary
844  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Brake booster question. on: February 09, 2010, 05:31:13 PM
I'll go check it again and let you know.

I checked and found what looks like 8354 or 9354. Either way the center 2 numbers are 35, not 36.


Gary
845  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Brake booster question. on: February 09, 2010, 03:15:35 PM
Thanks John. Already read that info. I guess I should re-word my question.

Gary
846  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Brake booster question. on: February 09, 2010, 02:38:54 PM
Currently I have the wrong brake booster on my 69 Z. Should be 9204 but have what looks to be 9364 with a 063 date.


Anybody have any info on brake booster application numbers for other vehicles or where I might find this info?



Gary
847  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Jerry M...Hello. My 480 distributor. on: April 19, 2009, 10:23:55 AM
Will this help any?
848  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Kurt S...Hello. My 480 distributor. on: April 19, 2009, 08:34:17 AM
Well...that doesn't sound too encouraging. Yeah, the picture isn't that great. I'll try to get another one today. When did the re-stamps start showing up? I bought my 06A Z in 2000 and it was in the car. I contacted one of the owners some years ago who had it (car) in 1988 and he got it (distributor 9E14) along with the crankshaft, heads (May 27, June 1) intake, and a service replacement 4053.

Thanks,
Gary
849  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Kurt S...Hello. My 480 distributor. on: April 18, 2009, 07:42:46 PM


This is the best pic I can get with the el-cheapo camera I have. Sorry...kind of blurry, but I'll take a shot. Does it look authentic?

Its been banged up a little at the 1111 numbers but after looking at a few junk distributors I have it doesn't appear to have been tampered with.

has the #532 cam, is dated 9  E14. Is there anything else to look for?

Thanks,
Gary
850  Site Comments / Discussion / Test Drive / test on: April 18, 2009, 07:33:01 PM
Posting a pic test.
851  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Adjusting rocker clearance on 30-30 cam. on: April 04, 2009, 07:08:27 PM
Actually, I was thinking the same thing myself. For years I was under the impression that all chevys rockers were 1.5 ratio. So I guess it is safe to say the .030 clearance is true with 1.5 rockers. I'll give it a go and see what happens.


Thanks,
Gary
852  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Adjusting rocker clearance on 30-30 cam. on: April 04, 2009, 11:52:44 AM
After reading and re-reading the info about valve adjustment on this site the .030 clearance is too wide for the 30-30 cam with the stock rockers. I understand the reason based on the provided info for the 1.37 stock rocker, but I'm not quite convinced that the clearances in the info are good if 1.5 rockers are used. Anybody?


Thanks,
Gary
853  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Adjusting rocker clearance on 30-30 cam. on: April 04, 2009, 09:41:16 AM
I have read the info on adjusting the valves many times to see if I am overlooking something but still not understanding it I guess.
If the 30-30 cam with the stock rockers requires a .026 clearance, what should the clearance be with 1.5 rockers. I'm a bit confused on this. Should it be .030? or .026?

Thanks,
Gary
854  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Adjusting rocker clearance on 30-30 cam. on: April 03, 2009, 08:11:35 PM
Been reading the info posted here for adjusting the rocker clearance on the 30-30 camshaft and was curious to know if the clearances are the same if using roller tip 1.50 rockers?  Huh

Thanks,
Gary
855  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 12 bolt width/8.5 10 bolt posi questions on: March 23, 2008, 06:01:37 PM
How wide is the Camaro 12 bolt backing plate to backing plate? I measured mine at approximately 53". Is this correct?

Also, I have a 8.5 10 bolt posi that measures approximately 56" backing plate to backing plate. Could this be for Chevelle possibly? Or 70's Camaro? I have this coil spring 8.5 10 bolt with a traction lock posi (based on info I received from BIGGEARHEAD last year) that I have no idea what it belongs to. Been surfing the web since 3 AM this morning trying to find info on it, but kept coming up facing a stone wall. I can't tell if it's a dated 69 unit or a 79 unit. Posi unit works fine. Based on the date of the differential H 15 9 and the carrier 410409 N dated H 2 9 and the ring gear part # 1 GM 1252065 17 41 dated 9 79 I can't tell if I'm coming or going. The passenger side tube has what may be a 7 but only has the bottom leg then KA   G267  1. I sure could use some help on this. I plan on just selling the posi unit but if the housing is a good needed housing I would rather see it go to someone that needs it.

Thanks,
Gary
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 18 queries.