CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 04:18:41 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97443 Posts in 11712 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 51
451  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust manifold head pipe parts on: May 21, 2013, 09:23:49 PM
Heat tube? That's automatic trans cars I think.
452  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Camaro battery on: May 21, 2013, 09:22:15 PM
Not a problem Dave. I ordered the side post cables this past weekend from LL. I was thinking of posting some pics if anyone was interested in looking at them when they come in.


Hello 69Z28,

Sorry for the delay; I have not been on CRG for quite some time.  I purchased a Delco ACD 78-7yr battery, item #19001631, professional grade car and truck, maintenance free battery.  Itís a 770 cold cranking Amp (CCA) rated and has never failed me for the seven years it has been in use.  The first one was purchased in 2000, and sure enough, 7-years later in June 2007, I purchased the 2nd unit. I use a battery maintainer if the car sits for more than 6 weeks or longer.  I try to at least drive the car once a month (give or take a few weeks) on a 10 mile trip during the winter if the streets are dry to keep everything in good working order and keep seals lubed. 

My side post negative cable is marked 6297650 AU, the positive cable is 6297683 AR, as noted in the AIM, Section 12 A11 on page 162.

Dave

453  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust manifold head pipe parts on: May 21, 2013, 06:46:06 PM
Thanks John for replying. I thought I was on my own and when looking at the AIM I wasn't completely sure. Never thought I would get away from hedders for iron manifolds.
454  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust manifold head pipe parts on: May 20, 2013, 09:53:36 PM
Anybody know if this is correct?
455  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Exhaust manifold head pipe parts on: May 17, 2013, 09:11:13 PM
Hey guys, I'm getting a list of parts together to connect my head pipes to the exhaust manifolds so I'll have them handy. What all do I need? So far I need to replace the heat valve on the passenger side. I think I'm just gonna go with the spacer on this. I'll need a stud kit for sure. Also I think I'll need 2 donut gaskets, inserts for the donut gaskets and a flat gasket for the spacer. Does that sound about right? I might go for new hardware and french locks as well. Let me know will ya? Thanks.

Oh yeah, who has all this stuff in one shot to buy? I haven't really looked yet. 
456  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4053 holley fast idle cam on: May 16, 2013, 07:38:20 PM
Did you check out the link I posted? That should be it, if that is what your looking for.


Here is a post on the Corvette site talking about it.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c1-and-c2-corvettes/290837-holley-again-fast-idle-cam.html


Something from the Supercar website.

http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=394461
457  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4053 holley fast idle cam on: May 16, 2013, 05:58:35 PM
I believe it's the 41R-539. Looking at a copy of a 4053 parts breakdown 'Holley Carburetion Variable Specifications And Parts' with part numbers that I have had since 1974 indicates (136)41R-539. Exploded view shows fast idle cam like what Everette's part number shows, but that not what is on a 4053. The one on the ebay auction may be green, but is more like what's on the OEM carbs.

Here is a pic of one.
458  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4053 holley fast idle cam on: May 16, 2013, 12:26:46 AM
Is this the part your asking about?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Holley-Choke-Cam-Green-41R539-/170549845514#ht_1211wt_806
459  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: manual trans neutral switch on: May 15, 2013, 01:28:33 PM
Gary.

You gotta really look up in there to see it.
460  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Owner's Manual - 3rd Edition, 1969 on: May 13, 2013, 06:44:09 PM
Tim, my reproduction don't have those pages in the back either, but the oem 3rd edition does.
461  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Brake Lights on: May 13, 2013, 05:05:20 AM
There's always been something about the standard tail lights that has been a mystery of sorts to me. On my 69 Z the outboard and inboard bulbs are on when the switch is in the running and/or headlight position. If I use the bulbs that it indicates to use in the owners manual the inboard bulb is always brighter than the outboard bulb when the light switch is on, and the state of Delaware doesn't like that. I had to find another lower candle power bulb that matches the outboard 1157 bulb in the running light position(not sure what number I used). I always though that both the inboard and outboard lights were supposed to flash when using the turn signal or apply the brakes, but they don't. The inboard light is just an ornamental light (that's what I call it anyway) and doesn't have any other function but to come on when the light switch is on. As for RS lights it may be different., I've not had the priledge of being near one to see how they work. I'm curious what others will say.   
462  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Owner's Manual - 3rd Edition, 1969 on: May 13, 2013, 04:34:46 AM
Hey Tim. I have a reproduction and an original to look at. The Reproduction says it's a reprint and the original doesn't. I don't have them in front of me to check but I think there are some page color differences also on a few pages. I'll look today and add what I find.

463  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 manual trans. power brake question on: May 11, 2013, 07:55:16 PM
I feel for ya Bently. Have the same thing going on in my neck of the woods too. I haven't seen another 69 Camaro anything near me within the past 10 years or so.



I live out in the sticks and do not know of any good specimen cars around me that I can look at to get correct information. Thanks, Bentley.
464  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Jack date question on: May 08, 2013, 02:01:42 PM
He emailed me and said it was an oversight. He thought he sent me a 9E. I can see this mistake happening. You really have to look close when it's an E or an F. I sent it out this morning for exchange.
465  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Starter nose for Z28 starter on: May 07, 2013, 03:34:38 PM
Hey Daniel. I sent you a PM. I don't have a problem paying you for it. Is it like what's in reply #3? I got to give you something if it is.

Gary I don't know how I missed it but I thought you needed a dated starter is the reason I haven't been reading real close. I've got a nose if that's all you need.  I'll give it to you if you'll pay the postage. I'll send you a PM.
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 51
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 18 queries.