CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 28, 2014, 08:11:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103594 Posts in 12177 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 58
421  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 08, 2013, 11:30:11 AM
The mast I bought has the same plain tip as in Gary's first pic.
422  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 08, 2013, 09:34:28 AM
Can we assume different vendors then? This would make identifying who manufactured it if there was an issue wouldn't it?
423  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cable Motor Support on: August 06, 2013, 11:33:49 PM
Same here. The 45000 mile survivor 69 Impala I bought has one on each side too. What are the chances the motor mounts are not broken.
424  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heartbeat City reputation on: August 06, 2013, 11:30:52 PM
If I'm not mistaken, there is a company which makes a lot of these parts which has the name "REPOP"...    Repro' is a more appropriate abbrev for Reproduction, and REPLACEMENT parts are not necessarily 'reproduction' either, if they simply replace the intended function, without a concerted effort to replicate the look, mfg, etc as well.


I found these yesterday afternoon.

425  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 06, 2013, 09:06:19 PM
One groove on the top knob? So the tip should have a groove then.
426  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust heat valve question. on: August 06, 2013, 04:31:09 PM
Thanks John...that's the shot I was looking for. The valve I have, looking at your pic, will be at 9 o'clock where yours is at 3 o'clock and the weight will be pointing the same as yours, towards the fender well. Can I assume that even these heat valves have differences in them? Or will/should they all be the same? I was looking at my survivor 69 Impala LM1 and the valve is installed with the weight on the left as well with rams horn (center dump) manifolds.


Reason I brought this up is because I took the headers off my Z to install the manifolds about a 1000 miles ago and noticed that the passenger head pipe was pushed up tight against the floor. I'm still wondering if I even have a packing donut in there. I'm sure I do since there isn't any exhaust leaks. I hate bring this up but I felt like I needed to. Always had headers on my cars so I have never seen what I need to connect UNCUT head pipes to manifolds before. At least now I know I need to get new studs ( short and long), 2 packing donuts, 2-2" head pipe extension tubes and a flat gasket. I should be all set then.
427  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 06, 2013, 04:17:48 PM
And yes the masts themselves were the same between Camaro and fullsize

Thanks guys. Really good info. How's it going Warren? I didn't think there would be any differences really but just had to ask. I'm still curious about the tip though. Shaun from the SS427 website had one I bought that has no groove on the tip and was wondering why. Looks good overall and the tip looks the same as the ones posted but no groove. Just one of those curious observations I get. Should there be a groove or not? Probably need more info.

This website is great. I can't say enough about all the help you guys have given me in the past even for the common parts that fit other vehicles, this is the place to find stuff out. No messing around here, just straight to the point.
428  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 06, 2013, 07:48:01 AM
Thanks. Something I did notice looking for a mast, some screw in and some slide in the base.
429  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust heat valve question. on: August 06, 2013, 07:46:21 AM
Any way to tell if this valve is stuck? The more I think about it, I noticed that at the rear tips the exhaust flows better on the drivers side than passengers. So I am thinking mine might be stuck?

I always thought something odd was going on there. In the wintertime I noticed how steam would be coming out more on the driver side exhaust then the passenger side on a lot of cars when they were first started up and run in the morning. Would see it a lot with dual exhaust, not at all on single exhaust of course.
430  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust heat valve question. on: August 06, 2013, 07:28:08 AM
Here is a pic of Jano's and the one I picked up for comparison. Note his valve weight on the left and mine on the right. So the valve weight on mine will point to the front of the car and his will point to the rear. Different for 68 and 69? Here's a question, how is the valve oriented when installed, with the arm on the engine side or the the fender side?
431  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heartbeat City reputation on: August 05, 2013, 08:20:16 PM
sure repro would make more sense, but seems like repop gets used more often. Same thing though reproduced parts


I know, I'm just busting your hump BULLITT...just fooling around...yeah, repop sounds so...teenage, doesn't it. But we're all still young right guys?...Guys?
432  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heartbeat City reputation on: August 05, 2013, 06:45:13 PM
Is it really repop or repro?
433  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 05, 2013, 06:43:42 PM
Thanks Ed. Looking at Fred's antenna in the link you provided looks like there are grooves in the mast as well but the tip doesn't look like it's grooved. The other pic has the grooved tip and it is shaped the same as mine with no groove. An AM mast, is a mast, is a mast, is a mast, correct no matter what model it was on. Would there be different ones for different models? I'm thinking there was one AM and one AM/FM mast for all models but thats just a guess on my part. There is an NOS mast on ebay right now.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/300943281425?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649


Anybody else have OEM AM antenna pics to share?
434  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heartbeat City reputation on: August 05, 2013, 06:17:12 PM
Sorry guys, what's a repop?
435  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 05, 2013, 04:07:22 PM
Hello everybody. I have a question or two, or three about the OEM factory AM antenna's for the 69 model year. Were the AM antenna's the same for A, B, and F models? If so was the tip plain or did they all have a groove middle way around it? Reason I'm asking is because I bought an AM mast for my 69 Impala that I'm going to assume is a correct oval type for at least the 69 Impala but not sure if it is correct only because I have never seen one for comparisons sake. This mast I bought has no groove around the tip. Is there something on antennas here on CRG? I didn't see anything unless I just haven't toughed on it yet. Just being curious. Was there a replacement that just had the plain tip?
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 58
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.432 seconds with 18 queries.