CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 27, 2014, 11:19:32 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102432 Posts in 12087 Topics by 4667 Members
Latest Member: hrascoll
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7
76  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 350 SS EXHAUST BRACKET on: November 05, 2006, 05:06:36 AM
So does that means the car is not an SS car then??  Was it just badged in 71 as an SS??
77  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original rear brake parts on: November 01, 2006, 06:14:39 AM
thanks for the info - -anyone else on the drums, are they date coded as well, shoe springs  . . do they have some special colors?

78  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original rear brake parts on: October 28, 2006, 11:01:15 AM
Is there anyway to identify the original rear brakes parts - shoes, cyc, drums and springs?
79  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1111480 distributor on: September 04, 2006, 02:56:38 PM
so for the 480 distributor - have we documented dates after sept of 69?
80  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring clean original trunk, touch up or strip it??? on: September 04, 2006, 02:21:37 PM
I think, if your going to redo the car - then you should do the trunk - people will say, u spent all the money to redo the car but did not finish the trunk???  I would take a lot of pics of the original looks, and with little effort, reshoot the inside...JMO
81  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring clean original trunk, touch up or strip it??? on: September 03, 2006, 03:02:50 PM
depends on what your doing with the car - -to start, id clean it up real good, you might be surprised as the result....looks pretty good to me...
82  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1111480 distributor on: September 03, 2006, 03:11:02 AM
Yes, exactly - thats why was asking on the 480, what is the latest date stamp anyone has heard of....as many as i have seen, none seem to be stamped much later than august i believe. 

What does the data base say - any dated in sept, oct of 69??
83  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1111480 distributor on: September 02, 2006, 07:10:32 PM
Correction on the distributor - is a 1112003 distributor.....i don't have the date code for it right now as im not with the car. 

Sorry for the confusion - any thoughts?
84  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 1111480 distributor on: September 01, 2006, 11:13:32 AM
I have a couple of questions for the board here...
1.  What is the latest date seen stamped on the 480 distributor?
2.  1112000 i was told to have been made there way into some 69Z's.   My car is a very late 69 built, 10D with the 2000 distributor.  Do we have others with the 1112000 installed we know about ?

Appreciate the info...
85  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What were the original nuts used on the '69 rear spoiler on: July 16, 2006, 02:15:12 PM
Thanks John for the info....learned another new bit of info on these cars today!! 

Would you happen to have a pic of the 3 designs you mentioned?   
86  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What were the original nuts used on the '69 rear spoiler on: July 16, 2006, 01:57:23 AM
JohnZ......in your pic, the tabs on the trunk lip.....it looks like 68 style vs the 69.  Have you noticed this??  I'm not an expert but thought the 69's trunk lips were smooth edge without the tabs?  What do yo u think?
87  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN# ON TITLE on: June 15, 2006, 03:44:17 PM
maybe CP for coupe??
88  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z-28 on: January 27, 2006, 04:31:35 AM
Send pics!!!
89  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z-28 on: January 19, 2006, 05:43:04 PM
No not from the cowl tag....u need the protecto plate to validate the MO motor to start. 
90  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Repop spiral shock absorbers on: January 18, 2006, 04:21:48 PM
u want to sell those nos ones your have   Roll Eyes
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.