16
Originality / Re: L-65 vs LM-1
« on: November 26, 2010, 09:07:21 PM »
For a few,
The LM1, in most cases got a 12 bolt and the L65 a 10 Bolt. In transmissions, the LM1 and SS cars got the Muncie MC1 as the base and upgraded 4 speeds, the L65 was a saginaw for the base transmission(s).
"The LM1 was replaced in January of 1969 by the L65 engine option, a 350 with a 2-barrel carb, rated at 250hp and priced at $21.10. Other than the carb, intake, and distributor changes, it was the same engine as the LM1. It would appear that this was a minor change with only a rated 5 hp reduction. But the effect on the L65 powertrain was dramatic."
(emphasis mine)
Engine info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml#engine
Camaros.org info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml
I run a registry here:
http://www.69lm1.com
Rich
The LM1, in most cases got a 12 bolt and the L65 a 10 Bolt. In transmissions, the LM1 and SS cars got the Muncie MC1 as the base and upgraded 4 speeds, the L65 was a saginaw for the base transmission(s).
"The LM1 was replaced in January of 1969 by the L65 engine option, a 350 with a 2-barrel carb, rated at 250hp and priced at $21.10. Other than the carb, intake, and distributor changes, it was the same engine as the LM1. It would appear that this was a minor change with only a rated 5 hp reduction. But the effect on the L65 powertrain was dramatic."
(emphasis mine)
Engine info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml#engine
Camaros.org info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml
I run a registry here:
http://www.69lm1.com
Rich