CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 01:20:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105859 Posts in 12353 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44
631  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Can anyone identify the exterior door handle on the Chip Foose 69 Camaro? on: April 04, 2006, 01:31:10 PM
I have been told these are 1996 Jaguar door handles.  Can anyone verify this?

Steve
632  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Can anyone identify the exterior door handle on the Chip Foose 69 Camaro? on: April 03, 2006, 09:18:26 PM
Here is a pic of the Chip Foose Camaro exterior door handle.  If anyone can identify, please let me know.

http://community.webshots.com/photo/437609437/1437620368011691741mBeHcj

Steve
633  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: ford (note little f) on CRG page on: April 02, 2006, 09:42:51 AM
Congratulations...you win.  Your prize is the 74 pinto pictured.  This rare and awesome automobile has been beautifully painted by Chip Foose himself with custom baby blue latex and topped off with genuine imitation Foose Rims.  You may claim your prize anytime.  Just come on down and pick it up.  It's ready to drive home.  However, we are not responsible for you getting "tapped" in the back of your new automobile while having more then 8 drops of gas in the gas tank. 
634  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Somebody's Feeling Frisky on: April 02, 2006, 09:38:48 AM
These pics were posted because I wanted to show how special and dear these three models hold to us car enthusiasts.  These cars were chosen because of their incredible looks, classic styling and performance and dependability that are second to none.  If only the GM could strive to make the Camaro as Awesome as these three. 

Happy April Fools.

Steve

PS:  If you guys don's start sending me your pics of 67-68 Camaros, I will have to post more fine cars such as these...Just kidding. 

I have tons of 69 pics, but I really need 67-68 pics as I do not get many at all.  If you have a 69 though, please send it anyway.  It may not get posted right away, but it will get posted sometime in the future.  I promise. 
635  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Adding console gauges and tach for 69 Camaro on: April 01, 2006, 03:45:13 PM
I see Ricks sells two harnesses that they say is needed for the changeover.  One for $85 and one for $55.  Do I need both of these or just the console gauge harness and attach it to my existing under dash gauge?

Steve
636  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Adding console gauges and tach for 69 Camaro on: March 30, 2006, 06:50:15 PM
I would like to add a tach and console gauges to my car.  Are the aftermarket gauges and tach good to use or should I look for original?  Second, I see there are two wiring harnesses to get.  Do I need both?  Can I use my existing underdash harness and tie in the console gauge harness or should I get the underdash harness as well?  How does the underdash harness install?  Do I have to remove my exisitng one?  How does the new harness plug in and install and how difficult?  Do I need a harness for the tach as well or is it included?  If anyone has done this conversion, please let me know of your experience.  Any and all help is always appreciated.
637  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z/28 - was power steering an option? on: March 24, 2006, 11:49:18 PM
Was power steering an option for 1969 Z/28's?

638  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Well liner color for 69 Camaro Pace Car on: February 14, 2006, 04:04:18 PM
What is the correct color for the well liner for a 69 Pace Car? 
639  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z brake booster fitting on: February 02, 2006, 05:15:39 PM
Would it have two vacuum ports if the car was an RS?

Steve
640  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What is the color of the door jamb strikers? on: February 02, 2006, 05:13:37 PM
What about the door latches?  Were they painted as well or are they a different color or natural?

Steve
641  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / What is the color of the door jamb strikers? on: February 02, 2006, 10:25:03 AM
I have a 69 Camaro.  The door jamb strikers are currently painted the color of the car.  Were these painted from the factory or were they installed later and are they a different color?  If so, what color, natural, silver, black, etc?

Steve
642  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / TH350 Transmission troubleshooting on: January 31, 2006, 08:26:48 PM
I completely rebuilt my TH350 in my 69 Camaro about 6 months ago (about 500 miles).  It worked great after that.  However, for tyhe last 3-4 weeks, when I first start it up and shift it into drive, 2nd or 1st gear. I hear the transmission engage, or some sort of clunk type noise in the tranny (but not the driveshaft), and there is no response.  The car acts as if it is completely in neutral, even though I am in a forward gear.  I rev it up and nothing.  If I go to reverse immediately after start up, there is no problem and it goes in reverse and backs up. After a few minutes of warming up, the transmission will then go into drive and act perfectly fine.  This is happening all the time.  As long as the tranny is warm, no problems.  The second it cools down, then only forward gears do not work.  There is plenty of fluid.  What do I need to look at?  All help is appreciated.

Steve
643  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Reproduction 1969 Camaro Coupe Shells on: January 28, 2006, 12:29:54 AM
For the 1969 Camaro I see they have the reproduction shells available in convertible.  Has anyone used these yet?  Have the hardtops been made yet as well?  Do they include the rear frame rails?  I am considering buying one if they have them since you can't seem to buy a coupe anywhere that is even remotely not trashed for a decent price.  Also, what are the titling issues if you build one from scratch?

Thanks,


Steve
644  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / What is wrong with this ebay auction? 69 Camaro Yenko Clone on: January 24, 2006, 02:34:30 PM
This appears to be a scam to me.  The guys got a good rating, but it looks like it was artifically built up that way with a bunch of cheap auctions.  The private bidders only seems odd too.  I am probably going to stay away unless I can get the seller to allow me to go see the car before bidding.  Any thoughts from you guys out there?

ebay auction # 4607404618

645  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Looking for a 1969 Camaro coupe on: January 24, 2006, 02:17:53 AM
Hope this is the correct place to post this request.  I am looking for a 69 Camaro coupe.  I am looking for something with a good body and clean title.  I do not mind some rust...I just don't want to restore the titantic.  What I am looking for can have but does NOT need a motor or transmission or interior.  I am not looking for anything with a lot of options either.  If it has those things, and you still want to sell, then let me know and we'll see what can be worked out.  My biggest concern is a decent body that does not have a ton of rust through the metal and nothing that has had bad bodywork where there is more bondo then metal.  I am looking for a fairly priced car.  I have cash and looking for a quick sale.  If you think you have a 69 that you can not finish or no time to get to or maybe your wife gave you the choice of either she goes or the car goes...and she won by a margin, then let me know. 

Steve
sdkar@bellsouth.net
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.