Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sdkar

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 50
16
Charles Bronson is driving quite insanely in his 69 Camaro.  None of us today would even come close to driving our bone stock Camaro in this manner. 

Anyone notice anything out of place here.  First one to figure it out wins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF8AesX1AOg

17
Here is an auction for seat backs in black. 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/231822884139?ul_noapp=true

I asked them if they had these in hugger orange, and they responded with the following:

Thank you for choosing CARiD on eBay.

Kindly provide me with the year, make, model, submodel of your vehicle to check on a different color option for you.

If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to us as we are here for your satisfaction before and after your purchase.

Sincerely,
Amalia Volls
Customer Experience Center


My response:  REALLY?  They need all of this info to know if they sell these in orange.  I can only guess these people are not in America, or have no clue what a car even is.  Is it me, or am I the only ones that despise certain people and/or companies when they ask you for all of this info?  The listed these, but have no clue if they have them in any other color?  SERIOUSLY? 

I find this even more frustrating when I need parts that are not vehicle specific.  Not long ago, I went to NAPA and asked for a set of plugs for a GM 502 engine.  The guy asked what the year, make and model it was for.   I explained it had nothing to do with the engine as if was a crate engine.  He then asked what year make and model the engine came from, to which I asked him if he understood what "crate engine" meant.  He had no clue.  He told me he had to have this info to find out if he had whatever it was in stock.  I told him that it would probably be an AC Delco rapidfire 4 plug, and he still could not tell me if he had them.  He stated that he needed his computer to tell him what was in stock and where to look for that item.  I told him couldn't he just go in the back and look at this spark plugs under AC Delco and look for #4 rapidfire?  His response was "NOPE".  OMG.  How do these people get jobs here.  Hey, I get that Advance Auto Parts and Autozone hire morons and very seldom do you have anyone that knows a damn thing about cars, but NAPA...I expected better.  This guy was helpless unless his computer could tell him what to think.  I left and have never been back.  I now find myself ordering 99.9% of my stuff online now...even stuff like oil, filters, and plugs.  It's no longer worth it.  The purpose of these places was supposed to be the human factor, someone to assist you.  Well that is gone.  You now MUST know what you want and tell them specifically, or you will not get what you need.

Now, to get back to where I was.  Why the heck does this company NOT know if they carry this item in another color?  I am betting for the same reason as what happened at NAPA.  They need a computer to tell them.  They need a computer to tell them when to go to the bathroom too I bet. 

Anyway, a decent deal for this price if you need them in black......provided they are decent reproductions.  It's say satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.  No cost to you if they suck and you have to return them.  If anyone gets a set from this seller, post and let us know if they are any good.


18
To follow up on the above.  GM didn't really make all the parts they used to build their cars...they bought them from suppliers.  One company who probably made the steering wheels and other dash goodies, one for the seatbelts, one for the seat backs, seat frames, trunk mats, and on and on and on.  What happened to those companies?  What happened to those molds and dies?  And did, say the seat backs, really cost all that much back then?  Today, a reproduction pair costs $99.  In 69, you could buy the entire car for about $2500.  So, 25 pairs of seat backs today equals one complete brand new 69 Camaro 50 years ago.  What was $99 worth then?  A base Camaro today is about ten times the cost of a base Camaro in 69.  Does that mean that seat backs cost $10 then?  I doubt GM paid $10 for just the plastic seat backs. Hell, I bet at most, they paid a buck or two for them...and that was sold at a profit to GM...not a large profit, but a profit still. 

So, how can we not duplicate this process again?  What was done then that is not done today?  If they are making molds to product these plastic pieces, then surely it cost the same money to make a mold that is spot on as it is to make a mold that is not even close.  Is it that hard to make a correctly formed mold?  Is it that much more expensive? 

I am not so sure it is the market, as all of us here are willing to pay more for a part that is correct.  Hell, rosewood steering wheels are selling for $1,500 because reproductions suck.  This amount of money for a part that cost GM $5 to make in 1969.  So, what gives.  If someone, no matter where, Taiwan, China, or USA are going to make parts for our cars, can they NOT go the extra yard to product a perfect part.  Is the wood grain that hard to match?  Is the shape of a panel that difficult to get the right measurements.  These manufacturers are not starting from scratch like GM did, they have the items already made to match up with.  The money is there...the quality is not.  Maybe the sales of reproduction parts are as low as they are is because of quality is terrible.  I bet whoever makes seat backs, would sell ten times more if they were correct...and that is at double the price they are selling them for now.  If you tool a part, make it right.  It takes the same amount of work to make the patterns, the molds, the dyes, the stamps, or whatever is used to mass produce, so, be exact.  In 69, they used slide rules to make the machines that made our cars.  Today, we have computers with lasers that can measure to the millionth of an inch, but we can't beat 50 year old tech. 

I have money, I have the desire to purchase, what I don't have is the correct item for sale.


19
The orange ones I got 15 years ago, were at least solid thru orange plastic.  Yeah, they still looked and fit like crap, but they were not white with orange paint.  I am still in awe over the fact that here we are 50 years later, with all of our technological advancements in manufacturing, plastics, computers, and so on, and we can not come even close to the the quality of 50 year old parts.  I just don't get. 

20
I was thinking of your idea of having two shifters chopped up to make one that will work for my situation.  They are aftermarket TKO shifters, so no big deal on chopping them up.  I lined them up and if I could get someone to weld the base of my shifter (the rectangle with two holes), onto the base of my spare shifter at the 5 o'clock position, it would work very nicely.  I have a small mig welder, but this being a shifter and my serious lack of ability to do real welding that I trust to this degree, I feel I will have to find a welder who can do this for me. 

I guess I can chop up my spare shifter, use the base and attach it to the shifter I want to use, zip tie it in place, and find a welder, that can make them one piece, it will work.  I need about an inch down, and an inch toward the passenger side, and I will be where I need it.

Thanks for the suggestion. 

21
Hey guys,

Well here I am again, looking for yet another recommendation in the wonderful world of reproduction parts.  I have a 69 Pace Car, and the hugger orange seat backs are looking bad.  Not just faded, as some spray dye could remedy that, but they are dry rotting.  The plastic is "burned" for lack of a better word, and the scratches I have are deep.  The plastic flakes when anything but a light touch strikes it. 

Anyway, I bought a pair about 15 years ago when I was restoring the car, and they were HORRIBLE.  The orange color was way off, and was almost a light orange as opposed the beautiful hugger orange we all love.  But the color was the least of my complaints.  The shape was not even close.  The curves were not right, and where the cover is supposed to turn in and meet the seat at the top, it looked bad.  Can't explain it fully, but anyone who has aftermarket panels from this time frame, knows they just plain sucked. 

Have the panels for sale today gotten better?  How do they compare to original?  Is the color right?  Is the contours and curves close?

If you have an opinion on the latest offerings, please let me know...good or bad.

Thanks.

22
And yet again more update on the journey that is my convertible boot cover.  Well, today I received the boot clips.  Kudos to D&R for doing the right thing finally.  I am going to quote Winston Churchill on a famous quote he made about America.  "You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else". 

So, I am proud to say everything with my purchase worked out for the best in the end.  I just wish I didn't have to go through the nonsense I had to with D&R.  Had I not insisted and followed thru with this issue, I would not have the completed top I have now.  Many thanks to D&R.  I still have to wonder if I am allowed to shop there still.


Which brings me to my next issue.  After killing my hands pulling and snapping these god awful clips in place, and getting the cover to hold in nicely, I have to ask...WHAT THE HECK DO YOU DO WITH THAT FLAP THING ABOVE THE REAR SEAT!?   Seriously, what they hell was GM thinking?  First, the snaps were insane to install.  It took half an hour to get them lined up and then pulling and pressing and stretching and pulling and pressing until I could hear that satisfying "SNAP!!!" and it is in place. 

I had a 73 Mustang Convertible many many years ago and the boot cover was awesome.  It installed basically like a front bottom seat cover...it had that heavy flexible plastic strip that folded around and slid into a groove that existed between the chrome and the body.  The part that went over the rear seat, slid into a "U" channel that was installed at the rear top of the seat.  It was a perfect seal, and was always straight, no buckling or anything...and it only took about 2 minutes by yourself. 

Whereas, there is this "flap" that doesn't seem to tuck completely behind the rear seat, doesn't seem to fold up under the covertible top, and if left how it is, looks like it becomes a big wind catcher while driving along.  I could not find any videos or anything.  So, any ideas, I am open to any suggestions.  I will say this.  I have seen a few (not many, but a few), first gen Camaro convertibles with the boot cover on them, and almost everyone looked like crap.  They buckled and looked like they would fall off without any trouble.  Mine is the best fitting I have ever seen.  I guess it is due to making sure EVERY SINGLE CLIP was snapped into place.  Also, my extra foam addition seemed to help tremendously in making it look nice, with nothing trying to poke thru. 

So, any suggestions on the flappy thing, I am listening. 

23
So, here is the latest on my endeavor to purchase a new convertible top boot for my 69 Pace car.  I didn't order the most expensive one that was advertised as "OE Style", as again, PUI stated that they only make one boot cover and all are of good quality.  PUI could not tell me of any difference between their boot covers, as they sell only one. 

The boot cover I ordered from the list above was the bottom one, as I could not see spending the extra money for what D&R says is a slightly thicker boot cover, when PUI says that all boot covers they make are equal.  I ordered the boot cover that said it included clips, which was important since my original cover had several broken clips. 

The boot comes in the mail, and at first, looked okay, but two things were of issue.  First, the foam on the back side is an absolute joke.  I still have my factory original boot, and the foam underneath is about an inch thick on each end where the cover goes over the frame rails and latches.  The center portion that covers only the top, the underside foam is about half an inch thick.  Well, the new boot cover isn't even 1/8" thick throughout the entire underside of the boot.  It looks like the material you would find on a cheap disposable diaper, and I am being very generous by saying it's even 1/8" thick, if that.  It is so thin, that when installed, you can see every pressure point and the latches look like they are going to poke thru in no time.  It looked bad.  After seeing this, I am willing to bet that the OE style boot they sell, is the exact same boot cover as PUI claims, but somewhere along the way, installed is a much thicker foam backing. 

In any case, a trip to Joann Fabrics, and I now have the exact same foam as my OE cover, for under $5.  I used my original boot cover as a template, cut to fit, some spray glue, and I now have an perfectly matched OE style boot cover, that is the proper thickness, and looks and fits much better.

Now, my second issue.  The boot sent to me, came without any clips.  When I checked back to D&R's website, the words "with clips" had been removed from the boot cover I purchased.  Luckily, I had taken a screen shot of it at the time I placed my order.  When I looked at my copy of the exact same part, it had the words "with clips" right there, in the title, in big bold black lettering.  Same exact part number, same price, everything the same, only now the words, "with clips" removed.  Someone changed the website. 

So, I called and spoke to Dottie and told her what I have discovered.  Sadly, I was not met with concern or sympathy, but instead, a cold uncaring statement telling me that the website was incorrect, it has since been corrected, and that it was too bad for me.  I stated that I did not think this fair, in which I was quickly reminded that there is a disclaimer in small print stating that prices may change with out notice.  - "The price quoted here is subject to change without notice." 

I responded by saying that I understand pricing changes, but it was not the price I took issue with, but instead, the item, being changed from one that included clips to one that no longer included clips.  The price did not change, the item they sent me did.  Furthermore, they made this change AFTER I placed my order, and never told me what they were doing. 

Dottie insisted that this change was proper, and that I did not deserve clips.  She even accused me of trying to take advantage of her by stating I should have known that the price I paid would not include clips. 

Anyway, in the spirit of trying to be fair and settle this quickly, I asked what it would cost for her to send me a set of clips.  I was told it would be the difference between the boot cover I bought and the price of the next boot cover up, less 10% website discount.  So, in the name of fairness, I offered to pay this and asked what the total charge would come out to.  I did my own quick calculations, and came up with somewhere between $25 and $30.  (109.95 - 79.00 = 30.95 at 10% off = $27.85. 

Yet, when a price was quoted back to me, I was told it would be almost $40 plus additional shipping on top of that, which would be another $15 or so.  This comes to about $50+ dollar or so, which is a far cry from what I had calculated.  I stated that this seemed quite high and not what I had expected.  Dottie stated she may be able to do something with the shipping, but reminded me that the website had now been corrected and that is what I must go by, despite my objections that when I bought the item, the website showed clips included.  I was again reminded that they can change prices at any time the want, and owe me nothing when they do so. 

Also, bear in mind, as shown in my post above, I called D&R PRIOR to making my purchase, and had asked specifically about each part number, and what I could expect from each one.  I was not told that the boot cover I ordered would not include clips.  In fact, I was told that the most expensive cover, the one they sell for $159.95 does not include clips, but is a higher quality boot cover than the lower two.  I was told that the two lesser expensive covers included clips, and was even referred to website, as they both stated “with clips”.  At no time during my questioning, was I told that the boot cover I ended up buying would not come with clips. 

So, it came down to my having two options, pay the extra $50 or so dollars for them to send me a set of clips, or return the item.  I told Dottie I would simply return the cover.  While discussing this, I was told that I would not only have to pay for the return shipping, but that I would not be reimbursed for this cost, nor would I receive a refund for the initial shipping I paid to have the item shipped to me.  This alone comes to over $40.  Also, as shown in their policy, I would be subject to a 20% restocking fee.  So, in order to return this boot cover, it was going to cost me approximately $57, give or take a buck.  A big hit if you ask me, and for something where I did nothing wrong. 

I told Dottie I did not think I was being treated fairly at all, to which she reminded me that she has the right to change the price, and not reimburse me for shipping charges, and all of this was properly outlined in their policies, to which I should have been familiar with.  Her attitude was anything but pleasant, and in fact, she seemed annoyed by my concern and her having to deal with me. 

At this point, I became upset over being treated so poorly, and informed Dottie that I had a copy of the website page showing the boot cover, and that it did indeed show it would include clips.  I stated that I did nothing wrong, and that if I was going to be forced to either pay $50 or so for a set of clips, or almost $58in order to return the boot back to them, that I would instead choose a third option.  This option would be to dispute the charges with my credit card company, send them a copy of the webpage showing the boot with a title stating “with Clips”, along with my story as to what happened, as let them make the determination over what is proper and who deserves what. 

Dottie became even more irate, and stated that I was trying to take advantage and get something for free.  I responded by stating very matter of factly, I was not trying to get anything for free, but simply what I bargained for.  She said the website stating "with clips" was a mistake and it has since been fixed, to which I replied that I did not think it fair I should have to pay for THEIR mistake.  The only thing I did was select a boot cover that said it came with clips, put it in my shopping cart, and checked out.  Where could anyone point out, that I made a mistake?  What did I do wrong that warranted me having to pay $50 or more dollars in order to correct or return their mistake?  I then reiterated that it was up to Dottie what I did next, but in no way was I going to take that kind of hit when I did absolutely nothing wrong. 

At this point, Dottie snidely remarked that she would send out clips to me.  She said nothing more, and hung up the phone.  I said Thank you, but I have no idea if she heard it, as I heard no response, and after a while, my phone indicated that the call had been disconnected. 

Now I have to wonder if I will indeed get the clips promised or not.  I was not given any confirmation o any response whatsoever that indicated that the promise to send them would be fulfilled…just a dial tone.  I have to ask.  Did I do anything wrong here.  Should I have paid the money requested for the clips?  Should I have made the return and took the $50+ dollar or so hit?  Should I have to go through an ordeal like this in order to do business with someone when it they who made the mistake?  Is this a common occurrence?  I understand that service is all but dead these days, and mistakes happen…but this really seems insane. 

Still, I wonder, am I allowed to purchase anything from D&R ever again, or have I been black listed?  In any case, I will update this and let everyone know if I ever received the clips or not. 

24
General Discussion / Where To buy Hugger Orange Spray Dye
« on: March 08, 2017, 12:57:32 AM »
Hey guys,

I am looking for hugger orange spray dye.  I bought OER hugger orange years ago, and got lousy results, but it was the only one I could find.  Plus, I can no longer find it where I bought it before.  So, is there a better product for hugger orange spray dye out there and where can I find it?

Thanks,

Steve

25
Hey guys,

I have a 69 Camaro that I would like to put in a console from another car.  However, my shifter is a little to far forward and to the left.  So, that would mean I would like to bring the shifter down about an inch or so, and to the right about an inch or so.   Are there any companies that sell custom off set shifters? 



26
Okay, from what I am finding out, there are three manufacturers.  PUI, TMI and Distinctive Industries.  I called D&R Classics, Ricks, and Classic, and despite my asking for the person most qualified to answer questions about the quality of convertible top boots, I seem to only get people whose knowledge extends to reading me the same description they have on their website.  I asked about if the welt piping is extruded nylon or twisted paper, the thickness of the material, the padding, etc. and I might have well spoken latin, as they had no clue and could refer me to no one else who might know. 

I have to wonder.  Do these supposed specialists in selling Camaro parts not have any clue as to what they are selling.  I mean, I am sure at one point, they made a decision to sell a certain brand over the other, and was that choice made by who offered the greatest profit margin or best quality for the customer.  Don't answer that...I know the answer.  Anyway, if there is someone at these places that has touched, felt, tested, and compared one over the others, I am unable to reach them. 

Another odd thing I have found is that D&R sells three different boots for the 69 Camaro convertible.  They are the following. 

1.  CG0013-Orange - Boot Convertible Top, with Clips, Orange 69
https://www.drclassic.com/catalog/Camaro/Convertible/CG0013-ORANGE.html

2.  CG0017-ORN - Boot, Convertible Top, with Clips, Orange 69
https://www.drclassic.com/catalog/Camaro/Convertible/CG0017-ORN.html

3.  CG0020-ORANGE - Boot Convertible Top, OE Style, Orange 67-69
https://www.drclassic.com/catalog/Camaro/Convertible/CG0020-ORANGE.html

Yet when I call them to ask the difference, they state that the 3rd one which sells for $159.95, is OE Style and does not have clips.  They said the other two come with clips, but the difference they believe is in the thickness.  They also stated that all three are PUI brand only and they do NOT sell any other manufacturer.  Yet, when I called PUI directly, they stated that they only sell one type of boot cover.  There is no OE style, there is no thickness difference, and if the boot is from PUI, it is the same as any other boot from PUI from any other retailer.  I tried to clarify this with D&R, but anything I could say was lost on them, and they would only repeat the wording from the website that I could read for myself. 

So many choices, so many wildly differences in price, and no one seems to know what they are selling. 

So, the first person who has something nice to say about any manufacturers boot that they have purchased, and liked the way it fit and so on, that is the one I will buy.  And if anyone who has anything to add about this topic, or is in the know, or is from any of the manufacturers or suppliers or retailers that has important info to pass on, it would be greatly appreciated. 

Steve



 





27
Hey guys,

Well, I am looking at the offerings for boot covers for my convertible, and they all look great in the photos, but which one will fit the best?  I see some for about a hundred bucks and some for over two hundred.  I don't mind spending the money, but I have learned that sometimes the most expensive is not better...it's just more expensive.  I have the clips from my original boot, so I don't care if the boot I buy comes with them or not.  I see TMI makes one, PUI makes one, and I read that PUI is better and then somewhere else someone says PUI stinks. 

So, has anyone actually bought a boot and is happy with the way it fits?  Would you recommend it or say pass?  Let me know.

Thanks,

Steve

28
Yes I do, and I still have them and still appreciate the heck out of them. 

Thanks,
Steve

29
Hello,

I have a 69 Indy pace car as well, and have owned it since 1999.  I am keeping records of all 69 pace cars I can find.  I have over 200 cars so far.  If you can, please send me your info, date code, options etc. and I will put it in the records.  This way, when anyone asks, I can tell them the info that you are looking for now.  Thank you.

Steve
sdkar@bellsouth.net

30
General Discussion / Re: Fake 1969 Camaro Indy Pace Car Alert
« on: January 03, 2017, 04:51:41 PM »
From what I gathered, the small block engine was not original to the car either.  It was never stated that I could find that the automatic TH350 transmission was original or not.  My guess is the car is a real Z11 pace car, but is a small block pace car with a non-matching engine. 

The value difference a small block pace car with a non numbers-matching 350 c.i. engine, automatic transmission, is about half that of the same indy pace car with a supposed all original 396 c.i. big-block, manual transmission drivetrain.  And that is why they did it.  take a $30-something thousand dollar pace car, install a $10,000 engine and transmission, re-stamp the numbers, and presto, you now have an $70k-$80K Camaro pace car.   

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 50