CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2014, 08:33:49 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97079 Posts in 11682 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 10:39:04 PM
Also look at what Heartbeat City sells for correct subframe hardware, interesting. I don't know if his are correct either but looks like its missing the special washers shown in the AIM (concave ones)......... 4 large and 2 smaller bolts.

http://www.heartbeatcity.com/store/product/14475/Camaro-Sub-frame-mounting-hardware--67-68-69/
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 09:44:43 PM
I don't understand why I would have 4 of same I never unbolted any other first generation subframe I can see 2 core support being different as I can't find them (or know what I am looking for).
I should not have 4 of same unless they are original to my car.
Maybe 67 was different than 69.
I have a 68 AIM  and it shows a revision on the 4 body bolts and I see that the bolt numbers are different for core support now also.
The 68 AIM list same pn# you have listed also.
I wonder if 67 AIM list different numbers?

Btw I also have 8(-1) rusty washers that go with those subframe bolts too. 4- 2 7/16" size and 3 (missing 1)- 1 1/8" (these are the concave washers)

Looks like I possibly found 1 of the original core support retainers also and if thats right it looks like core support bolt could have been bigger or did it just hold washers on?



I have nos subframe bushings but probably should sell em for $$.
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 03:45:05 PM
Well I thought I had all 6 but think I may have trashed the 2 worst looking (still looking) ones so all I have is 4 that are all the same and all 4 have "built in" washers.

I am still pretty sure they all are the same anyone else have your originals?
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 12:44:18 PM
All 6 of mine are the same and I have them at hand also. They all have the built in washer.
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 02:11:04 AM
Anyone?
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Correct subframe bolts on: April 25, 2010, 09:21:46 AM
I am almost positive that I was first to unbolt my subframe and feel these are the correct bolts. There was some discussion on TC on correct bolts and I did a search here and there but found no pics.
Anyway here is a pic of mine there are no markings that I can see.
Are these the real bolts used on the assembly line?
Do all subframe bolts 67-69 look the same?
Just curious is all and does anyone reproduce the correct bolts?



Btw these are pointed on the end just can't see it.
22  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: 230 OR 250 C.I. 6 cylinder on: March 15, 2010, 03:43:19 PM
The original engine is long gone but was wandering if there was other indicators as to what size it was originally.
23  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / 230 OR 250 C.I. 6 cylinder on: March 15, 2010, 02:58:49 AM
Is there anyway to tell what engine originally came in my 67 convertible?
I have often wondered whether it was a 230 or a 250.
Also is there any data showing how many of each engine were porduced in 67 Camaro's?
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Excellent Source for Original AC Delco AM and AM / FM Radios! on: February 08, 2010, 05:26:13 PM
I got lucky and found a nos am radio on ebay. I won it in the last minute because noone had met the reserve and I had a gut feeling about what the reserve price was. I was right and won the auction meeting the reserve of $250.00.

I don't care if it works or not just wanted something nice to fill the hole and it was well worth the money imho.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Buyer beware discussion on: February 02, 2010, 01:39:00 AM
It looks like he has a new name and according to his 1'st feedback "Not original GM parts- repo w/remake stickers".

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-CAMARO-SS-Z-28-RS-NOS-REAR-BUMPER_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem19b9a8c346QQitemZ110489027398QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 vin date stamp on: December 27, 2009, 08:15:23 PM
Nicely equipped car:

1 = Chevrolet
2 = Camaro
4 = 8-cylinder engine
37 = coupe body
7 = 1967 model year
N = Norwood, OH assembly plant
108144 = vehicle serial number sequence
 
Decode for body number: 008164
 
09C = Built the Third week of September.
67-12637 = Custom Interior Coupe.
NOR = Built in Norwood Ohio.
732 = Custom Bright Blue Bucket Seats.
Z = (A50) Strato Bucket Seats.
F-2 = Lower Color is Marina Blue and the Vinyl Top Color is Black.
R = Interior paint is Bright Blue
Options:
1E = (A01) Tinted All Glass
1X = (A31) Power Windows
2E = (C60) Air Conditioner
2M = (M35) Powerglide Transmission
2G = (D55) Console front compartment
3B = (C50) Defogger rear window
3S = (Z23) Interior Decor group
3D = (U29) Courtesy Lamp
3L = (Z22) Rally Sport Package
4F = (D33) Mirror Remote Control
5B = (V31 & V32) Front and Rear Large Bumper Guards
5Y = (A39) Belts All Deluxe

I have asked this question before but was told 5B code meant rear bumper guards only. Has this changed and is 5B widely accepted as meaning front and rear bumper guards now?
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Buyer beware discussion on: November 17, 2009, 09:17:53 PM
I read about that guy but also remember reading about this guy selling repro parts for nos also. Now there are 2 different names from same location with very similar pics. something seems fishy here also.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-CAMARO-Z28-COPO-RS-NOS-REAR-BUMPER_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem414a70e91fQQitemZ280421787935QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/RARE-1969-Z-28-CAMARO-NOS-FRONT-BUMPER_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem35a48a71baQQitemZ230393803194QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct Bolt for '67 Rear Bumper Bracket on: October 09, 2009, 07:06:13 PM
Glad to help out good luck on your project.
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct Bolt for '67 Rear Bumper Bracket on: October 07, 2009, 04:42:25 AM
I have all the originals in front (I believe) of me (missing 1 bolt for smaller bracket). They are all 1 1/2 " long.

The only difference is the smaller 2 brackets (of which I am missing one bolt for some reason I had it at one time) that each has 1 bolt, those are different slightly: the washers are 1/8" smaller (1 1/8 " for the 6 bolts and these 2 that have 1" washers) and they are threaded on the pointed part of the bolt whereas the other 6 the threads stop at the point.

Hope this helps.
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: std. to repo fenders on: September 15, 2009, 03:19:22 AM
I not sure what he meant when he said no holes, I meant mine have holes for the "Camaro" emblem.  Smiley
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.095 seconds with 18 queries.