CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 21, 2014, 01:10:16 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104615 Posts in 12241 Topics by 4719 Members
Latest Member: Baconcks
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: 230 OR 250 C.I. 6 cylinder on: April 29, 2010, 10:40:29 PM
In 67, only the 250 engine got the fender emblems, if the fenders are original.
Other than that, none that I know of (68 & 69 too). The L6 engines were pretty much the same except for the displacement.


I remember seeing a broken piece of a red white & blue shield that came off original fender but don't remember seeing any engine designation and I can't remember if it had holes for it either.
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 6cyl Car on: April 29, 2010, 10:36:27 PM
Cool how about some pics? Mine is a 6banger vert originally and I must admit it is tempting to put it back stock because seems like you see more and more modified Camaro's very few 6 cylinder ones to boot.
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 29, 2010, 10:31:31 PM
I was the first to remove my 67 bolts 23 years ago. The heads are all the same w/ integral washers and hash marks as the first post. Core supports are 1/2", S.frame are 5/8". My 68 subframe has bolts as shown in Reply#8, slide 2, Core support bolts MIA.

Are the subframe bolts on the 68 original also? If so your saying they are different than 67 or do you think G.M. used both ....bolts w/ integral washer and without on 67-69 Camaro's? Thanks in advance.
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 27, 2010, 11:28:31 AM
Is your core support bolts also 5/8" as mine are 1/2"?  And yes, there is a spring washer for the core support.  I think mine were too weathered to save.

I cannot find them don't know what I did with them.
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 27, 2010, 10:42:33 AM
Hogdaddy - Good deal on the fit.  Now I'm curious to what the diameter of the bolt is.  Do you know?   Is it 5/8" or 1/2"?  

It's also clear the GM used different suppliers through the years and even during the same year as the same plant.   So long it met the bolt spec, it was probably on the approved list.    

It is 5/8" I checked.
Btw the 68 AIM shows 3 washers for the core support : SPL. (spring)washer ,P(fender washer?) washer and L (lock) washer
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 27, 2010, 10:40:11 AM
I just double checked the 68 AIM and accordingly the "retainer" retains 1,2,3, & 8 to the CORE SUPPORT prior to assembly to the frame.
 Also, I checked core support....... it is a much bigger hole and the retainer looks like it would function correctly there. I believe it is correct afterall.
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 10:51:41 PM
I was going to say that the subframe bolts have quite a bit bigger diameter than the core support bolts.   Go try this - take one of your core support bolts and see if it screws into a body mount.  I'd bet it doesn't and that should answer the question whether your's came with all the same bolts.

It screws into the body mount hole perfectly! There can be little doubt that it is not the right bolts imho.

Heartbeat City shows the core support bolts smaller too like you say so that couldn't be an original core retainer in pic above I guess.
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 10:39:04 PM
Also look at what Heartbeat City sells for correct subframe hardware, interesting. I don't know if his are correct either but looks like its missing the special washers shown in the AIM (concave ones)......... 4 large and 2 smaller bolts.

http://www.heartbeatcity.com/store/product/14475/Camaro-Sub-frame-mounting-hardware--67-68-69/
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 09:44:43 PM
I don't understand why I would have 4 of same I never unbolted any other first generation subframe I can see 2 core support being different as I can't find them (or know what I am looking for).
I should not have 4 of same unless they are original to my car.
Maybe 67 was different than 69.
I have a 68 AIM  and it shows a revision on the 4 body bolts and I see that the bolt numbers are different for core support now also.
The 68 AIM list same pn# you have listed also.
I wonder if 67 AIM list different numbers?

Btw I also have 8(-1) rusty washers that go with those subframe bolts too. 4- 2 7/16" size and 3 (missing 1)- 1 1/8" (these are the concave washers)

Looks like I possibly found 1 of the original core support retainers also and if thats right it looks like core support bolt could have been bigger or did it just hold washers on?



I have nos subframe bushings but probably should sell em for $$.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 03:45:05 PM
Well I thought I had all 6 but think I may have trashed the 2 worst looking (still looking) ones so all I have is 4 that are all the same and all 4 have "built in" washers.

I am still pretty sure they all are the same anyone else have your originals?
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 12:44:18 PM
All 6 of mine are the same and I have them at hand also. They all have the built in washer.
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: April 26, 2010, 02:11:04 AM
Anyone?
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Correct subframe bolts on: April 25, 2010, 09:21:46 AM
I am almost positive that I was first to unbolt my subframe and feel these are the correct bolts. There was some discussion on TC on correct bolts and I did a search here and there but found no pics.
Anyway here is a pic of mine there are no markings that I can see.
Are these the real bolts used on the assembly line?
Do all subframe bolts 67-69 look the same?
Just curious is all and does anyone reproduce the correct bolts?



Btw these are pointed on the end just can't see it.
29  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: 230 OR 250 C.I. 6 cylinder on: March 15, 2010, 03:43:19 PM
The original engine is long gone but was wandering if there was other indicators as to what size it was originally.
30  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / 230 OR 250 C.I. 6 cylinder on: March 15, 2010, 02:58:49 AM
Is there anyway to tell what engine originally came in my 67 convertible?
I have often wondered whether it was a 230 or a 250.
Also is there any data showing how many of each engine were porduced in 67 Camaro's?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.