CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2015, 10:46:53 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112107 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Muncie Transmission on: March 30, 2015, 04:46:56 PM
I have a 69 trans with earlier shifter rod mounting studs installed.

Might have been modified over the years.  What is the casting number on the side cover?
3950306 is the number. I think it was modified to fit earlier Camaro.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Muncie Transmission on: March 27, 2015, 04:58:22 PM
I have a 69 trans with earlier shifter rod mounting studs installed.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: January 01, 2015, 10:31:36 PM
that little handbook should help to answer some of the questions that have occurred here..      Nice to have such info..  Smiley

Glad I could help. Smiley
4  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: New member with New 68 Camaro Convertible 6-Cylinder on: December 30, 2014, 01:00:21 AM
Congrats on your new Camaro! I've been thru Florence a few times in the past. It must have been a nice trip in the convertible.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: December 30, 2014, 12:45:03 AM
This may be of some interest to some concerning Fisher 21. Maybe this has been posted previously.

http://substreet.org/1967-fisher-21-employee-handbook/
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: July 12, 2014, 10:00:08 PM
So I guess if you have a car sent to a Zone office, you are done. No way to find out anything correct??
Dealer 0 Zone 30.

It would appear that we're SOL. Sad

Not necessarily guys, contact the current zone office, see who was the zone manager or his assistant try to contact one of them. Maybe you have Mr. Perkin's Camaro, or Mr. Campbell's Camaro, or the Camaro that went to the New York Worlds Fair, if you just quit you won't find out anything for sure.

How would you go about contacting the current Zone office, is this public info?

No luck here after looking into locating the zone office. I don't believe there are zone offices anymore well at least not in Alabama.
Maybe someone else had better luck?
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: May 29, 2014, 03:01:21 AM
Exactly..  and the only thing they were intended to 'set the pace' for..  was SALES..   Smiley
ie.. nothing special about the cars except for the options that were discounted to zero....  the factories have always done similar things (and still do) to spur orders when sales are slow...

I realize that it was nothing special I was just thinking since my car has most of those options it may have been.
Now I am also curious why this (nothing special) car ended up at the zone office.

With the the options available at the time, why go for a 6-banger vert?
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: May 28, 2014, 09:24:37 AM
So I guess if you have a car sent to a Zone office, you are done. No way to find out anything correct??
Dealer 0 Zone 30.

It would appear that we're SOL. Sad
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: May 27, 2014, 06:02:20 PM
I think that's just a bit too early. I haven't seen a pacesetter before April.

Would it have been possible for the zone office (since dealer code 0) to get one early for promo duty?
Since I have never seen this combo on another car and can't picture it , I am thinking it was a pretty sharp looking Camaro at one time.

10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: May 24, 2014, 12:58:39 PM
Ok I was curious which dealer my lowly 6 cyl. convertible came from.
I got this in the mail today.
Dealer code 0......oh well

11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: How many T-1 in database? on: April 25, 2014, 01:19:36 PM
7 in the database.

Any pics available?
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / How many T-1 in database? on: April 23, 2014, 02:51:34 AM
I asked this question in someone elses thread didn't mean to hijack and since got no reply I figured it would be best to start my own thread here.
Anyways, Is there more in the database with this combo T-1 on a 67 Camaro convt?
Thanks in advance.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 - Y-1 (Butternut with White top) - Anyone have any pictures? on: April 07, 2014, 12:45:33 AM
There's about 30 Y-1 cars in the database.

How many T-1 cars are there in the database?
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: February 24, 2014, 05:24:33 PM
Fwiw I believe I have a pacesetter promo car. The original L6 is gone but from the broken badge on fender it looked like a 250.
Obviously nothing special , possibly build date coincides with the promo?
I could be wrong.


O3D                           E
TR 760-Z           T-1
2B     3SK
5B
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Lacquer Vs. Enamel for the Camaro on: June 08, 2013, 06:04:47 PM
FWIW I have a Norwood 1980 Camaro that I bought new and it still sports the original lacquer paint.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 18 queries.