Messages

91

General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures

« on: December 30, 2014, 05:45:03 AM »

This may be of some interest to some concerning Fisher 21. Maybe this has been posted previously.

http://substreet.org/1967-fisher-21-employee-handbook/

92

General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available

« on: July 13, 2014, 03:00:08 AM »

So I guess if you have a car sent to a Zone office, you are done. No way to find out anything correct??
Dealer 0 Zone 30.

It would appear that we're SOL.

Not necessarily guys, contact the current zone office, see who was the zone manager or his assistant try to contact one of them. Maybe you have Mr. Perkin's Camaro, or Mr. Campbell's Camaro, or the Camaro that went to the New York Worlds Fair, if you just quit you won't find out anything for sure.

How would you go about contacting the current Zone office, is this public info?

No luck here after looking into locating the zone office. I don't believe there are zone offices anymore well at least not in Alabama.
Maybe someone else had better luck?

93

General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different?

« on: May 29, 2014, 08:01:21 AM »

Exactly..  and the only thing they were intended to 'set the pace' for..  was SALES..  
ie.. nothing special about the cars except for the options that were discounted to zero....  the factories have always done similar things (and still do) to spur orders when sales are slow...

I realize that it was nothing special I was just thinking since my car has most of those options it may have been.
Now I am also curious why this (nothing special) car ended up at the zone office.

With the the options available at the time, why go for a 6-banger vert?

94

General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available

« on: May 28, 2014, 02:24:37 PM »

So I guess if you have a car sent to a Zone office, you are done. No way to find out anything correct??
Dealer 0 Zone 30.

It would appear that we're SOL.

95

General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different?

« on: May 27, 2014, 11:02:20 PM »

I think that's just a bit too early. I haven't seen a pacesetter before April.

Would it have been possible for the zone office (since dealer code 0) to get one early for promo duty?
Since I have never seen this combo on another car and can't picture it , I am thinking it was a pretty sharp looking Camaro at one time.

96

General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available

« on: May 24, 2014, 05:58:39 PM »

Ok I was curious which dealer my lowly 6 cyl. convertible came from.
I got this in the mail today.
Dealer code 0......oh well

97

Decoding/Numbers / Re: How many T-1 in database?

« on: April 25, 2014, 06:19:36 PM »

7 in the database.

Any pics available?

98

Decoding/Numbers / How many T-1 in database?

« on: April 23, 2014, 07:51:34 AM »

I asked this question in someone elses thread didn't mean to hijack and since got no reply I figured it would be best to start my own thread here.
Anyways, Is there more in the database with this combo T-1 on a 67 Camaro convt?
Thanks in advance.

99

General Discussion / Re: 1967 - Y-1 (Butternut with White top) - Anyone have any pictures?

« on: April 07, 2014, 05:45:33 AM »

There's about 30 Y-1 cars in the database.

How many T-1 cars are there in the database?

100

General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different?

« on: February 24, 2014, 10:24:33 PM »

Fwiw I believe I have a pacesetter promo car. The original L6 is gone but from the broken badge on fender it looked like a 250.
Obviously nothing special , possibly build date coincides with the promo?
I could be wrong.


O3D                           E
TR 760-Z           T-1
2B     3SK
5B

101

Originality / Re: Lacquer Vs. Enamel for the Camaro

« on: June 08, 2013, 11:04:47 PM »

FWIW I have a Norwood 1980 Camaro that I bought new and it still sports the original lacquer paint.

102

General Discussion / Re: I have a 1967 Camaro with no antenna.....

« on: April 10, 2012, 11:28:32 PM »

My 67 had a rear antenna hole in original quarter although no S on TT.
The hole was very clean factory looking (circular w/notch) I am guessing the dealer had a tool to punch the holes?

103

Originality / Re: 1967 rear wheelhouse plugs

« on: March 17, 2012, 11:10:00 PM »

I believe they are different I have some somewhere I will post pics later.

104

Restoration / Re: New reproduction 1967 door lock knobs

« on: March 17, 2012, 11:08:39 PM »

Fwiw my 67 convt. w/standard black interior & RPO Z23 came with the (chrome looking) bright metal door knobs.

It's entirely possible that someone changed them out but I have my doubts.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=4947.0

105

Originality / Re: 1967 rear antenna nut NOS GM ?

« on: June 29, 2010, 07:29:45 AM »

I have a rear antenna bezel that is also supposed to be nos. It says WARD also fwiw.