CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 22, 2014, 10:38:24 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107639 Posts in 12512 Topics by 4814 Members
Latest Member: speedyb
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: sandblasting? on: December 09, 2006, 08:45:54 AM
Wally,
Media blasting is not as invasive as sand, yet removes paint just as well.   This may not be a concern with undercarrige and trunk, but would be on body panels.   Just a thought.
Bill
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 without cowl tag on: May 18, 2006, 12:01:06 PM
Sounds like a decent deal.   Good luck with the purchase.   I'm actually in mourning, as I recently sold my '68Z.   It was a good investment, and those $$ are now in what I hope to be a better investment.   What is the other car you are buying along with the '67?

Bill
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Valve covers for 68 z28 on: May 17, 2006, 07:01:34 PM
To make clear, '67 Z were chrome w/Chevy embossing, '68 "plain" chrome, '69 finned alum. 
All agree?
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Silver Camaro Concept Car - Atlanta 2006 Auto Show on: May 07, 2006, 12:25:49 PM
I still don't like the car, though it may be grow on me.    I think it needs to be much more retro as in 1rst. gen. styling.    But then they did not ask for my opinion.    That said, they may miss a huge part of potential market (baby boomers) by not making significant changes.   Anyone agree, or am I in a dream world???
Bill
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: B-J Auction Results on: April 22, 2006, 10:06:30 AM
Phillip,
What you say makes sense to me.  I suppose it is better to be on the selling side rather than the buying with current prices.   I can take substantial profit now, just hope I don't regret it in a few years.   I'll definitely feel better than when I, like many, sold classic Camaros for peanuts back in the good 'ole days.  On a positive note, if I sell now, I can begin the "fun" of buying and starting a new resto!
Thanks for your response,
Bill
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / B-J Auction Results on: April 20, 2006, 07:54:07 PM
I am interested in the forum's opinions regarding the Barrett-Jackson Auction results.   The B-J January and April auctions continue to bring huge prices for American Muscle, especially 1rst gen. Camaros.   COPOs are going for several hundred thousand dollars, Z28's from sixty thousand to two hundred grand.   Are the prices going to continue to increase, or have they reached the maximum.
I have people contacting me monthly looking to buy my '68 Z, and at times I'm tempted to "cash in".   Opinions???

Thanks,
Bill
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: ford (note little f) on CRG page on: April 03, 2006, 08:23:17 PM
Doubt if I could accept even a free "Foose Original".  Tough I vaguely remember my wife (maybe x-wife) buying a '73 Pinto wagon.   But that was a few years prior to my first 1rst. Gen. Camaro, so I forgave her!
So, thanks but no thanks,
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / ford (note little f) on CRG page on: April 01, 2006, 08:39:56 AM
Do I win a prize for seeing and mentioning the April Fools pics on our home page?

Bill
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 Head Swap on: February 16, 2006, 08:58:37 PM
John,
I agree with you.  Unless I needed more detailing in the engine bay, I don't see removing engine.   Someone has suggested taking off front wheels to lower car.   Makes sense I guess.   Anyone tried this before?
Thanks for your reply,
Bill
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / 302 Head Swap on: February 15, 2006, 08:39:25 PM
I am getting ready to put the correct 291 heads on my Z28.  It has been suggested to me that the engine be removed to change heads.   This would make detailing easier after heads are changed.   Others say it can be done o.k. without taking the engine out.   Needless to say, there is some concern about "scratches and dings" doing it either way.    Any suggestions or "dos and don'ts" from the forum will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Bill
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 302 HEADS (2.02) on: February 09, 2006, 09:13:55 PM
My intent was to say that not all '67 462 and 291 heads had 2.02 valves.  But could be changed.  Sorry if I confused anyone. 
Thanks,
Bill
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 302 HEADS (2.02) on: February 07, 2006, 08:08:00 PM
Maybe not completely original.   They would have been changed to the 2.02 valves.  I am interested in buying.  Do you have digital photos available?
Thanks,
Bill
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z-28 Info for Data Base on: February 05, 2006, 03:30:33 PM
Rich & Kurt,
Here is the info I have.  The Z was purchased Sept. '68 from Vaughn Chevrolet, Lynchburg Virginia.  As mentioned in prior post, I have spoken to the first and second owners.  Thanks to all CRG staff for their great work.
Bill

VIN 124378N479958

Trim Rag:   07D
                ST 68-12437      NOR 180991
                TR 714              UU

Engine:      18N479958        VO718MO

Axle is BV code (4:10)   

Muncie M21 with matching partial VIN

E 70 X 15  Tire Pressure Sticker is intact.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 2009 Camaro Pictures on: February 03, 2006, 08:36:31 PM
In my opinion GM missed a golden opportunity.  Input from Camaro enthusiast like the people on this forum would have been very valuable information for their design team.   But then what do we know?   We only live , breath and invest thousands of $ in first gen. Camaros.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Z-28 on: February 02, 2006, 02:03:04 PM
Rich,
I have been following this thread with high interest.  I have '68 Z with original engine, trans. rear end etc, but no paper documentation except tire pressure sticker.  I do however have signed statement from the original owner, after the car was recognized online by a friend of the second owner.  (Actually met him today)  My question, would you like me to send the information I have for the CRG data base?
Thanks,
Bill
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.