CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 15, 2014, 08:00:50 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104426 Posts in 12229 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 23
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: alternator broadcast codes on: October 01, 2013, 02:13:04 PM
This may be a new can of worms - would the code be different for the same alternator part number when used at Norwood for Camaros, then it was when used at St. Louis for Corvettes.  Cause then there may be lots of changes needed?

Typically my lists are based on Corvette research....
which is farther along then most other Chevrolet car models.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: alternator broadcast codes on: October 01, 2013, 08:46:02 AM
oops - - Typo--- NF is correct.

1100693   37 amp   CB
1100834   37 amp   CW
1100814   37 amp   CK
1100837   37 amp   CZ
1102454   37 amp   YG
1100900   42 amp    NW
1100901   42 amp    NX
1100950   42 amp    RF
1100543   42 amp    RG
1100544   61 amp    RH
1100859   42 amp    NP
1100833   42 amp    CV
1100881   42 amp    NR 
1100696   42 amp    CS
1100750   61 amp    CD
1100796   61 amp    CH
1100825   61 amp    CT
1100843   61 amp    NF
1100882   61 amp    NS
1100884   61 amp    NT
1102440   37 amp    EC
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: alternator broadcast codes on: September 30, 2013, 09:48:46 PM
1100693   37 amp   CB
1100834   37 amp   CW
1100814   37 amp   CK
1100837   37 amp   CZ
1102454   37 amp   YG
1100900   42 amp    NW
1100901   42 amp    NX
1100950   42 amp    RF
1100543   42 amp    RG
1100544   61 amp    RH
1100859   42 amp    NP
1100833   42 amp    CV
1100881   42 amp    NR 
1100696   42 amp    CS
1100750   61 amp    CD
1100796   61 amp    CH
1100825   61 amp    CT
1100843   61 amp    NL
1100882   61 amp    NS
1100884   61 amp    NT
1102440   37 amp    EC
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: distributors - what do you think? on: September 01, 2013, 07:31:06 PM
1 more.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: distributors - what do you think? on: August 31, 2013, 08:16:47 PM
1 more
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / distributors - what do you think? on: August 31, 2013, 08:14:02 PM
had these in my closet for as long as I can remember--- 20+ years.
gonna move these along - just wanted to be sure I represented them correctly...

did they even restamp way back then?

what you think?
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vacuum Advance Pod Number on: August 12, 2013, 05:59:16 PM
B1 VA is an aftermarket unit- those were never installed at the factory.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vacuum Advance Pod Number on: August 11, 2013, 11:01:38 AM
my 2 units are 111169's - they both have the 732CCW
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Vacuum Advance Pod Number on: August 11, 2013, 09:14:13 AM
I have 2 untouched units here right now - both have the 732CCW.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wiper blade refills on: July 27, 2013, 01:13:36 PM
I would agree with John - all were stainless - easy to see when you hit an untouched junkyard and all the blades are still perfect.

I tried a magnet, and my results were mixed - some were magnetic some we not.
There did not seem to be a patten based on style or stampings.

the main problem with the peaked ones and what makes them so rare, is they are very fragile.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wiper blade refills on: July 26, 2013, 05:11:53 PM
Don't go throwing anything away just yet.
I am just relaying what all the Corvette judges believe to be fact. I am still a firm believer that multiple styles of many things were used simultaneously.
Every Corvette, Camaro in 67 used the same blade holders - hard to believe every single one was exactly the same with the same stampings.
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wiper blade refills on: July 26, 2013, 01:33:26 PM
Yes - 67 was only Trico.
not sure about 68
69 started the Made in USA.

now to be perfectly honest most can't tell the difference, or can't see the difference.
And unless you are being judged by Bloomington Gold or NCRS with your Corvette. - I wouldn't sweat it.
Last time I sold a set of the <Trico> blade holders for 67, I think a 67 Corvette guy gave me $375 for the pair.

Lucky I had an extra set, or I may have considered selling them off my car.   Wink
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wiper blade refills on: July 25, 2013, 11:15:57 AM
On the left are satin peaked blade holders for 66 67 68 69. On the right are flat chrome used in 63 64 65.
Early 66 cars still used the shinny ones.  not sure of the exact change over date.
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 Z exhaust and smog systems on: July 22, 2013, 11:11:54 PM
Before you spend any money for Gardner's VERY VERY EXPENSIVE exhaust system.
read this ---> http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=168582 the trouble started on page 3.

Have you looked at the systems from D&R - A great system at a great price. www.drclassic.com
Every bit as original for 1/3rd the price.

if you really need stainless, then try these guys ---> www.waldronexhaust.com
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Best Method to Put in Rear Seat? on: July 16, 2013, 11:10:26 PM
You can look under the seat with a flashlight and see the hooks. 

Lay your head sideways on the floor and find the hooks...
Use a pry bar to "push back" or un-hook the one spring wire held by the floor hook.

You can do one side at a time....
I use this trick at the junk yards to get seats out that are really really stuck.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 23
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.425 seconds with 18 queries.